Pengukuran Kualitas Instrumen Tes Objektif Pendidikan Agama Islam dengan Program Anates

Irfa Ma'alina Li'illiyyina; Ayya Mutia Zannuba; Murtiwi

doi:10.28918/4syydx44

Authors

Irfa Ma'alina Li'illiyyina Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan Author
Ayya Mutia Zannuba Author
Murtiwi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/4syydx44

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the quality of multiple-choice test items used in the Mid-Semester Summative Assessment of Islamic Religious Education and Character Building (PAIBP) for sixth-grade elementary school students in Bumijawa District, Tegal Regency, using Anates Version 4.0.2. The study employed a descriptive quantitative approach involving 150 students selected through simple random sampling. The instrument consisted of 10 multiple-choice items with four answer options. The analysis covered item validity, reliability, difficulty level, discrimination index, and distractor effectiveness. The findings showed that only 7 items (70%) were valid, while 3 items (30%) were invalid. The reliability coefficient was 0.60, indicating that the test lacked sufficient consistency. The difficulty level distribution was unbalanced, dominated by very easy and easy items, with no difficult questions identified. In terms of discrimination power, 70% of the items were categorized as good to very good, while 30% were poor. Additionally, 72.5% of the distractors functioned effectively. Overall, the assessment instrument still requires revision, particularly regarding invalid items, ineffective distractors, and the disproportionate difficulty level distribution to improve assessment quality and accuracy. These findings imply that teachers need to strengthen evidence-based assessment practices through systematic item analysis and regular revision of question banks. Furthermore, educational institutions should promote assessment literacy and quality assurance mechanisms to ensure that summative assessments accurately measure students’ learning outcomes and support data-driven instructional improvement

Keywords:

item analysis islamic education religiousa anates

References

[1] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York, NY, USA: Longman, 2001.

[2] M. I. Anshari, R. Nasution, M. Irsyad, A. Z. Alifa, and I. A. Zuhriyah, “Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas butir soal sumatif akhir semester ganjil mata pelajaran PAI,” Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 964–975, 2024, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5931.

[3] Z. Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, dan Prosedur. Bandung, Indonesia: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2021.

[4] S. Arikunto, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3rd ed. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

[5] R. Ariyanti and D. W. Kusuma, “Kualitas butir soal pilihan ganda PAI kelas VI SD di Kabupaten Purbalingga: Tinjauan validitas dan reliabilitas,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2023, doi: 10.1234/jpai.2023.04.01.

[6] A. D. Augustia, C. N. Agustia, D. Azzahra, L. Hakim, and V. Pratiwi, “Analisis validitas dan reliabilitas soal pilihan ganda dengan menggunakan software Anates pada mata pelajaran perpajakan,” Akademik: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ekonomi & Bisnis, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 250–265, 2025, doi: 10.37481/jmeb.v5i1.1165.

[7] S. Azwar, Reliabilitas dan Validitas, 5th ed. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar, 2021.

[8] R. L. Ebel, Essentials of Educational Measurement, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1979.

[9] S. Fatimah and A. Rahman, “Analisis daya pembeda soal pilihan ganda PAI kelas VI SD di Kabupaten Brebes menggunakan ANATES,” Jurnal Evaluasi dan Asesmen Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–91, 2022, doi: 10.5678/jeap.2022.03.02.

[10] I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 26, 10th ed. Semarang, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2021.

[11] M. D. Hukubun, E. Rumahlewang, and J. Matitaputty, “Peningkatan kapasitas guru penjasorkes dalam menganalisis butir soal,” Pakem: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2022, doi: 10.30598/pakem.2.1.54-61.

[12] S. Jumaeda, “Evaluating the effectiveness of Islamic religious education learning in implementing 2013 curriculum in madrasah,” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 2022, doi: 10.15575/jpi.v8i1.19017.

[13] K. Kusaeri and S. Suprananto, “Penggunaan teori respons butir dalam pengembangan instrumen asesmen PAI di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah,” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215–234, 2022, doi: 10.14421/jpi.2022.112.215-234.

[14] S. Kusaeri, Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Graha Ilmu, 2022.

[15] I. Mahmudi, A. Rosyidi, and T. Wahyudi, “Konsep taksonomi Bloom dalam desain pembelajaran modern jenjang sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 89–101, 2022.

[16] D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Parama Publishing, 2020.

[17] S. Mulyani and R. Hidayat, “Pemanfaatan program ANATES dalam analisis butir soal ujian akhir semester mata pelajaran PAI di SD Negeri se-Kecamatan Adiwerna,” Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89–106, 2023, doi: 10.24042/atjpi.v14i1.16432.

[18] J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

[19] S. Nurhalimah, Y. Hidayati, I. Rosidi, and W. P. Hadi, “Hubungan antara validitas item dengan daya pembeda dan tingkat kesukaran soal pilihan ganda PAS,” Natural Science Education Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 249–257, 2022, doi: 10.21107/nser.v4i3.8682.

[20] E. Nurhayati and D. Pratama, “Dampak analisis butir soal berbasis ANATES terhadap peningkatan kualitas instrumen penilaian guru PAI SD,” Ta’dib: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 134–149, 2023, doi: 10.37216/tadib.v12i2.8976.

[21] S. Pastore, “Teacher assessment literacy: A systematic review,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167.

[22] A. Pratama, “Penerapan Taksonomi Bloom pada evaluasi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar: Tinjauan sistematis terhadap kecenderungan instrumen kognitif dasar,” Jurnal Pelangi Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2025.

[23] N. Purwanto, Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2024.

[24] P. Purwanto, “Antara ‘Multikulturalisme’ dan pendidikan multikultural (sebuah autokritik),” Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 931–958, 2023, doi: 10.69896/modeling.v10i3.2485.

[25] F. Rahmawati, B. Kusuma, and T. Hartono, “Efektivitas pelatihan analisis butir soal menggunakan ANATES bagi guru SD di Jawa Tengah,” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 54–67, 2024, doi: 10.17509/jpgsd.v13i1.54678.

[26] M. Ramadhan, R. Siroj, and M. Afgani, “Validitas and reliabilitas,” Journal on Education, vol. 6, pp. 10967–10975, 2024, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885.

[27] A. A. Rezigalla et al., “Item analysis: The impact of distractor efficiency on the difficulty index and discrimination power of multiple-choice items,” BMC Medical Education, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 445, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05433-y.

[28] A. Rohmatdi, M. Martono, Z. Zafrullah, and R. Safitri, “Optimizing question quality in junior high school exams: Classical test theory evaluation with ITEMAN 4.3,” Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4363–4375, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5671.

[29] D. P. Sari and A. Nugroho, “Implementasi asesmen tengah semester berbasis soal pilihan ganda dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada jenjang sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8234–8244, 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3456.

[30] A. Setiyawan, “Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi reliabilitas tes,” Jurnal An-Nur, vol. VI, no. 2, 2014.

[31] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, 2nd ed. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.

[32] L. Wijayanti and I. Maulana, “Analisis kualitas butir soal asesmen tengah semester PAI kelas V SD di Kecamatan Slawi: Studi menggunakan ANATES versi 4,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 112–127, 2023, doi: 10.30659/pendas.10.2.112-127.

[33] R. Yulianti, H. Prasetyo, and M. Aminudin, “Analisis efektivitas pengecoh soal pilihan ganda asesmen sumatif PAI kelas VI SD: Pendekatan teori klasik dan ANATES,” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 22–38, 2023, doi: 10.21831/jep.v14i1.45612.

[34] M. Yunus, “Pelatihan analisis butir dengan program Iteman di MTs Jihadul Ummah Desa Pyung Kecamatan Jonggat Kabupaten Lombok Tengah,” Jurnal Pengabdian Bersama Masyarakat Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2025, doi: 10.59031/jpbmi.v3i1.589.

[35] Z. Zulpan, A. Syafi’, D. U. Alfansuri, S. Salsabila, S. W. Hasibuan, N. Azizah, and D. L. Mustikawati, “Kualitas soal: Tingkat kesukaran daya pembeda pengecoh soal,” Teaching and Learning Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 93–101, 2025, doi: 10.66770/tlrj.v1i4.81.