Development of Artificial Intelligence in the Dispute Resolution of Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v21i1_04Abstract
The number of disputes in religious courts continues to increase every year, giving great potential to develop the use of artificial intelligence to make it more efficient and effective by paying attention to the basic principles of Islamic law. This paper discusses the potential and development of the use of artificial intelligence technology in dispute cases in religious courts based on Maslahah Mursalah. The research method is juridical-normative, with a conceptual and philosophical approach. The research shows that the use of artificial intelligence in dispute resolution at religious courts is important for the reason that it can minimize the risk of errors and help judges determine legal considerations in the dispute resolution of Islamic law so that they are more accurate, effective, and efficient. The potential for developing the use of artificial intelligence technology in religious courts must consider several aspects, including the integration of artificial intelligence technology in the dispute resolution process in religious courts, the development of artificial intelligence-based decision support systems, and legal-ethical aspects of the use of artificial intelligence in religious courts. The formulation of the concept for developing the use of artificial intelligence technology in dispute resolution in the religious courts must be guided by the Maslahah Mursalah principle as a moral-ethical foundation within the legal system framework, which includes legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture so that the development of the use of artificial intelligence technology in the disputes resolution of Islamic law in religious courts be effective and justice for all.
Keywords:
References
Ahmed, Muhamad Rizky Rizaldy and Habib. “Islamic Legal Methodologies and Shariah Screening Standars: Application in The Indonesian Stock Market.” Language Learning Journal 131, no. 2 (2015): 469–86.
Alarie, Benjamin, Anthony Niblett, and Albert H. Yoon. “How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Practice of Law.” University of Toronto Law Journal 68, no. 1 (2018): 106–24. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0052.
Alessa, Hibah. “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Online Dispute Resolution: A Brief and Critical Overview.” Information and Communications Technology Law 31, no. 3 (2022): 319–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2022.2088060.
Ariwijaya, Abdul Rachmat, and Palupi Lindiasari Samputra. “Evaluasi Kebijakan Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 51, no. 4 (2021): 14. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no4.3303.
Bagaric, Mirko, Dan Hunter, and Nigel Stobbs. “Erasing the Bias Against Using Artificial Inteligence To Predict Future Criminality: Algorithms Are Color Blind and Never Tire.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 88, no. 4 (2019): 1037–81.
Brougham, David, and Jarrod Haar. “Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ Perceptions of Our Future Workplace.” Journal of Management and Organization 24, no. 2 (2018): 239–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55.
Budhwar, Pawan, Ashish Malik, M. T.Thedushika De Silva, and Praveena Thevisuthan. “Artificial Intelligence–Challenges and Opportunities for International HRM: A Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 33, no. 6 (2022): 1065–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2035161.
Chatziathanasiou, Konstantin. “Beware the Lure of Narratives: Hungry Judges Should Not Motivate the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Law.” German Law Journal 23, no. 4 (2022): 452–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.32.
Coelho, Nuno. “Kelsen and Scholten on Reason and Emotion in Solving Cases.” Aristotelian Protestantism in Legal Philosophy: Rethinking Paul Scholten for the 21st Century 1 (2022): 315.
Dahlan, Idhami. “Karakteristik Hukum Islam.” Surabaya, Al-Ikhlas, 1994.
Daud, Mahyuddin. “Artificial Intelligence in the Malaysian Legal System: Issues,Challenges and Way Forward.” Insaf 39, no. 1 (2022): 1–24.
Et.al, Muhammad Nazir Alias. “A Review of Maslahah Mursalah and Maqasid Shariah as Methods of Determining Islamic Legal Ruling.” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, no. 3 (2021): 2994–3001. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1331.
Fachri, Ferinda K. “Kembangkan Aplikasi Penunjukan Majelis, MA Gunakan Artificial Intelligence.” Hukumonline.com, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kembangkan-aplikasi-penunjukan-majelis--ma-gunakan-artificial-intelligence-lt63f4542d35bf3/.
Farih, Amin, and M Mukhsin Jamil. Kemaslahatan & Pembaharuan Hukum Islam. Walisongo Press, 2008.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Legal Culture and the Legal Profession. Routledge, 2021.
Gazali, Haneffa Muchlis, Junisa Jumadi, Noor Rasyidah Ramlan, and Nurmaisarah Abd Rahmat. “Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic Investments.” Journal of Islamic Finance 9, no. 2 (2020): 70–78.
Haqqi, Zainul, Muhammad Najib Asyrof, and Muhammad Roy Purwanto. “The Strategy of The Siak Sri Indrapura Religious Court in Realizing a Modern Jurisdiction with Integrity” 2022 (2022): 167–76. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11355.
Haryanti, Dewi. “Application the Concept of Justice Based on Al-Qur’an Interpretation in the Construction of Indonesia’S Legal System.” International Journal of Law Reconstruction 4, no. 2 (2020): 98. https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v4i2.4902.
Hoeschl, Hugo C., and Vânia Barcellos. “Artificial Intelligence and Law.” IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 154, no. 4 (2004): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1665-5_3.
Ibrahim, Malik. “Reformasi Birokrasi Pada Lingkungan Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 11, no. 2 (2018): 133–46.
———. “Tunggakan Perkara Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama Dan Upaya Penanggulangannya.” Aplikasia: Jurnal Aplikasi Ilmu-Ilmu Agama 18, no. 1 (2018): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/aplikasia.v18i1.1833.
Ingrams, Alex. “Bureaucratic Reform.” Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_626-1.
Irkhin, I. V. “Discussion on the Nature of the Principles of Law (Legal Principles) in the Context of Convergence of Legal Systems.” Lex Russica 4, no. 4 (2020): 117–29. https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.161.4.117-129.
Jain, Parth. “Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Effective Justice Delivery in India.” OIDA International Journal Of Sustainable Development 11, no. 06 (2018): 63–70.
Jaya, Febri, and Wilton Goh. ““Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Kecerdasan Buatan Atau Artificial Intelligence Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pada Hukum Positif Indonesia".” Supremasi Hukum 17, no. 2 (2021): 1–11.
Ji, Weidong. “The Change of Judicial Power in China in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 7, no. 3 (2020): 515–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.37.
Kurniawan, M. Beni. “Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) on the Civil Cases in Indonesia Court As a Legal Renewal of Civil Procedural Law.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.43-70.
Kusumawardani, Qur’ani Dewi. “Hukum Progresif Dan Perkembangan Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan.” Veritas et Justitia 5, no. 1 (2019): 166–90. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.3270.
Lane, Lottie. “Clarifying Human Rights Standards Through Artificial Intelligence Initiatives.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 71, no. 4 (2022): 915–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000380.
Law Number 11 of 2019 concerning the National System of Science and Technology (2019).
Lupo, Giampiero. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Ethical Frameworks Disciplining AI in Justice and Other Contexts of Application. Onati Socio-Legal Series. Vol. 12, 2022. https://doi.org/10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1273.
Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika, Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini, and I Suandita. “Implementation of E-Court in Settlement of Civil Cases in Singaraja District Court.” In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2573. AIP Publishing, 2022.
Mardhatillah, Aida. “LIA, Chatbot Hukum Pertama Indonesia Resmi Diluncurkan.” Hukumonline.com, 2018. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lia--chatbot-hukum-pertama-indonesia-resmi-diluncurkan-lt5b6a4dcab1765/.
Martin-bariteau, Florian, and Industrial Revolution. “Artificial Intelligence and the Law in Canada.” Artificial Intelligence and the Law, 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344015.
Merryman, John, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press, 2018.
Munoko, Ivy, Helen L. Brown-Liburd, and Miklos Vasarhelyi. “The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing.” Journal of Business Ethics 167, no. 2 (2020): 209–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1.
Palomares, Iván, Eugenio Martínez-Cámara, Rosana Montes, Pablo García-Moral, Manuel Chiachio, Juan Chiachio, Sergio Alonso, et al. A Panoramic View and Swot Analysis of Artificial Intelligence for Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030: Progress and Prospects. Applied Intelligence. Vol. 51, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-02264-y.
Paputungan, Munirja, Ni Made Ary Wisiastini, and Ni Luh Wayan Sayang Telagawati. “Analisis Manajemen Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (Ptsp) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan.” Publik: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Administrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik 10, no. 2 (2023): 446–56. https://doi.org/10.37606/publik.v10i2.676.
Pengadilan Agama Bandung. “Pelatihan Teknis E-Court Untuk Pegawai Pengadilan Agama Bandung Ke-II.” https://pa-bandung.go.id/, 2019. https://pa-bandung.go.id/Seputar-Peradilan/301-Pelatihan-Teknis-E-Court-Untuk-Pegawai-Pengadilan-Agama-Bandung.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Perubahan atas Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan secara Elektronik (2022).
Prakken, Henry. “On the Problem of Making Autonomous Vehicles Conform to Traffic Law.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 25, no. 3 (2017): 341–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9210-0.
Purwaningsih, Endang, and Irfan Islami. “Analisis Artificial Intelligence (AI) Sebagai Investor Berdasarkan Hukum Paten Dan Hukum Islam” 11, no. 13 (2023): 1–15.
Putra, Dedi. “A Modern Judicial System in Indonesia: Legal Breakthrough of E-Court and E-Legal Proceeding.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.2.2020.275-297.
Radbruch, Gustav. “Law ’ s Image of the Human.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40, no. 4 (2020): 667–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa026.
Rahmaddani, Imam. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP FAKTOR DAN DAMPAK PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN (ANALISIS KASUS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SUBANG).” Jurnal Supremasi Hukum 19, no. 27 (2023): 72–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v19i1.3349.
Re, Richard M, Alicia Solow-Niederman, Dan Bussel, Kiel Brennan-Marquez, Margot Kaminski, Karen Levy, Martha Minow, et al. “Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice.” Stanford Technology Law Review 242 22 (2019): 243–88.
Rodgers, Waymond, James M. Murray, Abraham Stefanidis, William Y. Degbey, and Shlomo Y. Tarba. “An Artificial Intelligence Algorithmic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Human Resource Management Processes.” Human Resource Management Review 33, no. 1 (2023): 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100925.
Said, Gulyamov. “Adapting Legal Systems to the Development of Artificial Intelligence: Solving the Global Problem of AI in Judicial Processes.” International Journal of Cyber Law 1, no. 4 (2023): 1–15.
Schofield, Philip. “Jeremy Bentham and the Origins of Legal Positivism.” CrimRxiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.167682f9.
Schwarting, Rena, and Lena Ulbricht. “Why Organization Matters in ‘Algorithmic Discrimination.’” Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie 74 (2022): 307–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-022-00838-3.
Shafique, Javairia. “Use of ICTs and Artificial Intelligence to Overcome Judicial Trial Delays in Pakistani Courts.” Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review 6, no. II (2022): 1153–63. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-ii)97.
Sharma, Mohit. “India’s Courts and Artificial Intelligence: A Future Outlook” 15, no. 1 (2023): 99–120.
Shaw, James, Frank Rudzicz, Trevor Jamieson, and Avi Goldfarb. “Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 21, no. 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/13659.
Sobah, Asep Nur. “Laporan Tahunan Gugatan Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama.” Mahkamah Agung, 2022. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/Publikasi/Laporan-Tahunan/.
Sousa, Weslei Gomes de, Rafael Antunes Fidelis, Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo, Ana Gersica da Silva Gonçalo, and Bruno de Souza Melo. “Artificial Intelligence and Speedy Trial in the Judiciary: Myth, Reality or Need? A Case Study in the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF).” Government Information Quarterly 39, no. 1 (2022): 101660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101660.
Spaak, Torben. “Relativism in the Philosophy of Law,” no. 2009 (2019): 1–19.
Sulaiman Lebbe, Rifai. “The Concept of Public Interest in Islamic Law (Maslaha) and Its Modern Implications.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3788222.
Sumirah, Encum, and Pitrotussaadah Pitrotussaadah. “Perkembangan Filsafat Syariah.” Jurnal Perspektif 5, no. 2 (2021): 204. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v5i2.136.
Taufik, Muhamad. “Strategic Role of Islamic Religious Education in Strengthening Character Education in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 20, no. 1 (2020): 86. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v20i1.5797.
Umar, Al-Muthahhiri, M. Hasbi, Ramlah. “MASLAHAH ’AMMAH: (A Comparative Study of The Concept Maslahah ’Ammah According To Nahdlatul Ulama And Ulama Mazdhahib Al-Arba’ah)” 5, no. 1 (2023): 65–88.
Undang-undang (UU) No. 50 Tahun 2009 Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama (2009).
Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (2019).
Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) 1945 (1945).
“Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama,” 2006.
Wang, Nyu, and Michael Yuan Tian. “‘Intelligent Justice’: Human-Centered Considerations in China’s Legal AI Transformation.” AI and Ethics 3, no. 2 (2023): 349–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00202-3.
Wang, Ran. “Legal Technology in Contemporary USA and China.” Computer Law and Security Review 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105459.
Wiek, Katja. “The Artificial Intelligence Act - The Impact of AI on Human Rights Standards in European Law Enforcement.” university of Twente, 2023. http://essay.utwente.nl/96320/.
Yahdi Dinul Haq, Hafizah Muchtia, Zia Alkausar Mukhlis. “Bid’ah in Concept of Maslahah Mursalah and Istihsan According to Imam Asy-Syathibi.” Ilmiah Syari’ah 20, no. 2 (2021): 225–37.
Yara, Olena, Anatoliy Brazheyev, Liudmyla Golovko, and Viktoriia Bashkatova. “Legal Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence: Problems and Development Prospects.” European Journal of Sustainable Development 10, no. 1 (2021): 281–89. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p281.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Hukum Islam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Islam use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.











