Integrating Neurolaw and Principles of Islamic Law: A Scientific Ethical Model of Criminal Responsibility

Zico Junius Fernando; Aris Hardinanto; Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin; Solehuddin Solehuddin; Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh

doi:10.28918/jhi.v23i1.09

Authors

Zico Junius Fernando Faculty of Law, University of Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Aris Hardinanto Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Solehuddin Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
Putra Perdana Ahmad Saifulloh Faculty of Law, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i1.09

Abstract

Neurolaw offers an innovative interdisciplinary framework that bridges the gap between neuroscience and legal theory and providing new insights into how human brain influences behavior, intention, and moral decision-making. This study examines the intersection of neurolaw and Islamic law, emphasizing the importance of integrating neuroscience findings, such as brain function, decision-making processes, and mental disorders, into Islamic law’s understanding of criminal responsibility, intention (niyyah), and reasoning (ʿaql). This study demonstrates the potential of neurolaw to strengthen empathy, justice, and an evidence-based legal approach in Islamic law using normative legal research methods through legislative, conceptual, comparative, and futuristic approaches. Furthermore, this study explores how Islamic law’s values of justice, objectivity, and responsibility can serve as ethical guidelines for the responsible use of neuroscience in legal reasoning. Ultimately, this study encourages a careful and principled integration of brain science and Islamic law that maintains fundamental Islamic values while embracing scientific advancements to create a more holistic and humane justice system.

Keywords:

Brain Science, Islamic Law, Legal Responsibility, Neurolaw, Neuroscience

References

Abdillah, Junaidi, Tri Nurhayati, Najichah Najichah, Lira Zohara, and Muchammad Tholchah. “Contribution Model of Al-Mas’ Ūliyyah Al-Jinā’iyyah in the Formulation of Criminal Liability in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code.” Al-Ahkam 34, no. 2 (2024): 367–92. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.2.22592.

Aggarwal, Neil Krishan, and Elizabeth Ford. “The Neuroethics and Neurolaw of Brain Injury.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31, no. 6 (2013): 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.2086.

Aharoni, Eyal, Chadd Funk, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, and Michael Gazzaniga. “Can Neurological Evidence Help Courts Assess Criminal Responsibility? Lessons from Law and Neuroscience.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124, no. 1 (March 2008): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/ANNALS.1440.007.

Alarefi, Abdullah Saad. “Overview of Islamic Law.” International Criminal Law Review 9, no. 4 (2009): 707–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/156753609X12487030862782.

Alotaibi, Hajed A. “The Challenges of Execution of Islamic Criminal Law in Developing Muslim Countries: An Analysis Based on Islamic Principles and Existing Legal System.” Cogent Social Sciences 7, no. 1 (2021): 1925413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1925413.

Appelbaum, Lawrence G, Mohammad Ali Shenasa, Louise Stolz, and Zafiris Daskalakis. “Synaptic Plasticity and Mental Health: Methods, Challenges and Opportunities.” Neuropsychopharmacology 48, no. 1 (2023): 113–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01370-w.

Aronson, Jay D. “The Law’s Use of Brain Evidence.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (October 2010): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-LAWSOCSCI-102209-152948.

Belcher, Annabelle, and Walter Sinnott Armstrong. “Neurolaw.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1, no. 1 (2010): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/WCS.8.

Bhattacharya, Saikat. “Selvi vs. State of Karnataka: A Critical Analysis.” SSRN, 2017, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3629205.

Biasiucci, Andrea, Benedetta Franceschiello, and Micah M Murray. “Electroencephalography.” Current Biology 29, no. 3 (2019): 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.052.

Blair, R James R. “Neurocognitive Models of Aggression, the Antisocial Personality Disorders, and Psychopathy.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 71, no. 6 (2001): 727–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.6.727.

Bottalico, Barbara. “Cognitive Neuroscience, Decision Making and the Law.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 2, no. 3 (2011): 427–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00001458.

Brown, Eryn. “The Brain, The Criminal and The Courts.” Knowable Magazine, 2019.

Bush, Shane S, and Chriscelyn M Tussey. “Neuroscience and Neurolaw: Special Issue of Psychological Injury and Law.” Psychological Injury and Law 6, no. 1 (2013): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9144-0.

Caccappolo, Elise. “The Neuropsychological Evaluation.” In Genetic Counseling for Adult Neurogenetic Disease: A Casebook for Clinicians, 313–22. Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7482-2_26.

Caruso, Gregg D. Neurolaw. Cambridge University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009271172.

Chandler, Jennifer A., Neil Harrel, and Tijana Potkonjak. “Neurolaw Today – A Systematic Review of The Recent Law and Neuroscience Literature.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 65 (2019): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.04.002.

Chandler, Jennifer A. “The Use of Neuroscientific Evidence in Canadian Criminal Proceedings.” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2, no. 3 (November 2015): 550–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsv026.

Detre, John A, and Thomas F Floyd. “Functional MRI and Its Applications to the Clinical Neurosciences.” The Neuroscientist 7, no. 1 (2001): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/107385840100700110.

Effendi, Erdianto, Zico Junius Fernando, Ariesta Wibisono Anditya, and M Jeffri Arlinandes Chandra. “Trading in Influence (Indonesia): A Critical Study.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (December 2023): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2231621.

Egbenya, Daniel Lawer, and Samuel Adjorlolo. “Advancement of Neuroscience and the Assessment of Mental State at the Time of Offense.” Forensic Science International: Mind and Law 2 (2021): 1–9. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2021.100046.

Erickson, Steven K., and Alan R. Felthous. “Introduction to This Issue: The Neuroscience and Psychology of Moral Decision Making and the Law.” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 27, no. 2 (March 2009): 119–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.858.

Farahat, Omar. “Time and Moral Choice in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 35, no. 1 (2022): 141–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2021.22.

Gkotsi, Georgia Martha, and Jacques Gasser. “Neuroscience in Forensic Psychiatry: From Responsibility to Dangerousness. Ethical and Legal Implications of Using Neuroscience for Dangerousness Assessments.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 46 (2016): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.030.

Grafman, Jordan. “Conceptualizing Functional Neuroplasticity.” Journal of Communication Disorders 33, no. 4 (2000): 345–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00030-7.

Grey, Ian, Amraim AlMazrouei, Justin Thomas, and Patrick Randall. “Forensic Psychology and Islamic Jurisprudence.” Mental Health, Religion & Culture 21, no. 1 (2018): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1437720.

Gusto, Agustorido, and Mar’ie Mahfudz Harahap. “Attempt to Commit Murder: A Comparative Study of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 8, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v8i3.42472.

Hamid, Abdul, Lely Setyawati Kurniawan, Rajab Lesraluhu, Satria Yudistira, Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Banjarmasin, Universitas Udayana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong, Provinsi Papua Barat Daya, Stai Miftahul Huda Pamanukan Subang, and Yayasan Abhipraya. “The Intersection of Psychology and Islamic Law: Addressing Mental Health in Legal Decision-Making Processes.” The Journal of Academic Science 1, no. 8 (December 2024): 1105–12. https://doi.org/10.59613/QWDNN545.

Jones, Owen D, Jeffrey D Schall, and Francis X Shen. “Law & Neuroscience: What, Why, and Where to Begin.” Law and Neuroscience, 2016.

Koob, George F. “Negative Reinforcement in Drug Addiction: The Darkness Within.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23, no. 4 (2013): 559–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.03.011.

Kupers, Ron, and Maurice Ptito. “Compensatory Plasticity and Cross-Modal Reorganization Following Early Visual Deprivation.” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 41 (2014): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.001.

Laliberté, Vincent, Maxine Aird, Ugo Gilbert Tremblay, and Sébastien Gendron. “When The Law Influences Medical Practice: Potential Impact of the Bouchard-Lebrun Ruling on the Forensic Unit of the Malartic Psychiatric Hospital in Northern Quebec, Canada.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 76 (May 2021): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJLP.2021.101686.

Langleben, Daniel D., and Jane Campbell Moriarty. “Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law, and Policy Collide.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 19, no. 2 (2013): 222–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0028841.

Lawrence, David R. “Neurolaw—A Call to Action.” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31, no. 4 (2022): 415–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000123.

Meynen, Gerben. “Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, no. 4 (2014): 819–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9501-4.

Muller-Gartner, Hans-W. “Imaging Techniques in the Analysis of Brain Function and Behaviour.” Trends in Biotechnology 16, no. 3 (1998): 122–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01163-3.

Pernu, Tuomas K., and Nadine Elzein. “From Neuroscience to Law: Bridging the Gap.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.01862/BIBTEX.

Petoft, Arian. “Neurolaw: A Brief Introduction.” Iranian Journal of Neurology 14, no. 1 (2015): 53.

Pliatsikas, Christos. “Understanding Structural Plasticity in the Bilingual Brain: The Dynamic Restructuring Model.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23, no. 2 (2020): 459–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000130.

QC, Ian Freckelton. “Dilemmas for The Criminal Justice System in Dealing with Diagnoses for Neuropsychiatrically Impaired Offenders.” Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal 8, no. 2 (2020): 64–75. https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2020.08.00308.

Rajbhandari, Bibek, Sushant Regmi, Kanchan Dahal, and Sandesh Shrestha. “The Intersection of Neuroscience and Criminology: Role of Brain Mapping in Addressing Criminal Behavior by Nepal Police.” Journal of Nepal Medical Association 62, no. 278 (September 2024): 709–11. https://doi.org/10.31729/JNMA.8786.

Reddy, K Jayasankara. “Neuropsychology of Criminal Responsibility.” In Foundations of Criminal Forensic Neuropsychology: Bridging Mind, Law, and Criminal Justice, 93–127. Springer, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83771-5_5.

Sala, Carlo, and Menahem Segal. “Dendritic Spines: The Locus of Structural and Functional Plasticity.” Physiological Reviews 94, no. 1 (2014): 141–88. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00012.2013.

Sauni, Herawan, Zico Junius Fernando, David Aprizon Putra, Saivol Virdaus, and Aris Hardinanto. “Beyond Borders: Shedding Light on Foreign Bribery through an Islamic Legal Lens.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (September 2024): 649–78. https://doi.org/10.29240/JHI.V9I2.9752.

Sbordone, Robert J., Tony L. Strickland, and Arnold D. Purisch. “Neuropsychological Assessment.” In Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology, 335. Boston: Springer Science & Business Media, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4219-3_19.

Schleim, Stephan. “Real Neurolaw in the Netherlands: The Role of the Developing Brain in the New Adolescent Criminal Law.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.01762/BIBTEX.

Shenton, Martha E, Bruce H Price, Laura Levin, and Judith G Edersheim. “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Is DTI Ready for the Courtroom?” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 61 (2018): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.002.

Sirgiovanni, Elisabetta, Gilberto Corbellini, and Cinzia Caporale. “A Recap on Italian Neurolaw: Epistemological and Ethical Issues.” Mind and Society 16, no. 1–2 (November 2017): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11299-016-0188-1/METRICS.

Soekadar, Surjo R, Klaus Haagen, and Niels Birbaumer. “Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI): Restoration of Movement and Thought from Neuroelectric and Metabolic Brain Activity.” In Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Dynamics, 229–52. Springer, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_11/COVER.

Xue, Gui, Chuansheng Chen, Zhong-Lin Lu, and Qi Dong. “Brain Imaging Techniques and Their Applications in Decision-Making Research.” Xin Li Xue Bao. Acta Psychologica Sinica 42, no. 1 (February 2010): 120–37. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00120.

Yoder, Keith J, and Jean Decety. “The Neuroscience of Morality and Social Decision-Making.” Psychology, Crime & Law 24, no. 3 (March 2018): 279–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1414817.

Zeki, S., O. R. Goodenough, Terrence Chorvat, and Kevin McCabe. “The Brain and The Law.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 359, no. 1451 (November 2004): 1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTB.2004.1545.

Zoghbi, Huda Y, and Stephen T Warren. “Neurogenetics: Advancing the ‘Next-Generation’ of Brain Research.” Neuron 68, no. 2 (2010): 165–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.015.

Zurawicki, Leon. “Exploring the Brain.” In Neuromarketing: Exploring the Brain of the Consumer, 1–53. Springer, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77829-5_1.