Editorial Independence

Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching protects the independence of its editorial assessment and publication decisions. Editors evaluate manuscripts on scholarly grounds, without improper influence from the journal owner, publisher, sponsors, advertisers, or other interested parties.

1. Basis of Editorial Decisions

Editorial decisions are based on the manuscript’s relevance to the journal’s aims and scope, originality, scholarly contribution, methodological or theoretical soundness, research integrity, and the evidence arising from editorial assessment and peer review.

Decisions must not be determined by an author’s nationality, ethnicity, gender, religion, institutional prestige, political views, or personal relationship with the journal’s personnel. The assessment of a manuscript’s arguments and evidence remains part of scholarly evaluation.

2. Protection from Organizational Interference

Ownership, publishing support, and operational management do not confer authority to require the acceptance or rejection of an individual manuscript. Such decisions rest with the editor authorized under the journal’s editorial arrangements.

The owner and publisher may raise documented concerns about research integrity, legal obligations, or operational matters through the appropriate journal procedures. These concerns must not be used to dictate a preferred scholarly outcome.

Editors must not be pressured, threatened with removal, or otherwise penalized for a good-faith editorial decision made in accordance with the journal’s policies. Any review of an editor’s performance must distinguish legitimate accountability from disagreement with an individual publication decision.

3. Financial and Commercial Separation

An author’s ability or willingness to pay an Article Processing Charge, eligibility for a waiver, or financial relationship with the publisher must not influence manuscript assessment or the acceptance decision. Acceptance must not be purchased or promised.

Publication targets, revenue expectations, sponsorship, advertising, and commercial partnerships must not determine which manuscripts are accepted, rejected, corrected, or retracted.

Financial administration is handled separately from scholarly assessment. Applicable charges, payment arrangements, and waivers are described in the Author Fee policy.

4. Personal and Institutional Influence

Submissions from editors, board members, publisher personnel, collaborators, or affiliated institutions must not receive preferential treatment. A relevant conflict of interest requires independent handling in accordance with the journal’s applicable policies.

Individuals holding both organizational and editorial positions remain subject to the same safeguards. Their organizational position must not be used to bypass independent assessment or influence the editor responsible for a manuscript.

5. Response to Attempted Interference

An editor who experiences attempted interference should document the communication and refer the concern to a non-conflicted editorial authority. If the Editor-in-Chief is involved, the concern must be referred to another suitably qualified, non-conflicted editor.

Where no suitable internal editor is available, an independent external editor should be engaged. A person whose conduct is under consideration must not control the assessment or its outcome.

Any resulting reassignment or editorial action must be recorded. Detailed complaint, appeal, and misconduct procedures remain governed by the journal’s relevant policies.