Analisis Materi Bilangan Rasional pada Buku Teks Matematika Siswa SMP Kelas VII berdasarkan Praxeology Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/circle.v6i1.2601Abstract
This research aims to analyze the presentation of rational number material in Class VII Junior High School Mathematics textbooks using the praxeological theory approach from Didactic Anthropology. The study focuses on the "Comparing Rational Numbers" sub-chapter within the textbook, which is analyzed through four praxeological components: type of task (T), technique (τ), technology (θ), and theory (Θ). The results show that the textbook presents a varied and sufficiently comprehensive range of task types. However, the techniques for solving problems tend to be monotonous, and the theoretical explanation (Θ) for certain mathematical concepts, such as fraction operations, is not presented explicitly or illustratively. In general, this textbook supports mathematics learning but still requires strengthening in the presentation of theory and the connection of the material to real-life contexts to help students understand concepts more deeply.
Keywords:
References
Ahl, L. M., & Helenius, O. (2021). A Framework for Analyzing Progress in Concept Knowledge in Mathematics Textbooks. Dalam Nortvedt, G. A., Buchholtz, N., Fauskanger, J., Hreinsdóttir, F., Hähkiöniemi, M., Jessen, B. E., Kurvits, J., Liljekvist, Y., Misfeldt, M., Naalsund, M., Nilsen, H. K., Pálsdóttir, G., PortaankorvaKoivisto, P., Radišić, J., & Wernberg, A. (Eds.). (2021). Bringing Nordic Mathematics Education into The Future. Preceedings of Norma 20 : The ninth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Oslo, 2021. Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning. Skrifter från Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning, 14. http://matematikdidaktik.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/04/NORMA_20_preceedings.pdf
Aisyah, A., Priatna, N., Juandi, D., & Priatna, B.A. (2025). Praxeological Analysis of International Mathematical Literacy Questions for Developing Numeracy Assessments. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 20(3), 33-40. https://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special%20Issue%20ISCoE%202024_4/ISCoE2024_4_05.pdf
Azhar, E., Saputra, Y., & Nuriadin, I. (2021). Eksplorasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Perbandingan Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2129–2144. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1405906
Baharuddin, M. R., Sukmawati, S., & Christy, C. (2021). Deskripsi Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Operasi Pecahan. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v6i2.1607
Barberán-Mendoza, M.L., & Alcívar-Castro, E.J. (2022). The Understanding of Mathematical Notions for the Cognitive Development of Students. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S5), 657-665. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.8695
Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R. (2011). Introduction to Real Analysis (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Blažanin, B., Radišić, J., Mićić, K., Krstić, K., & Baucal, A. (2025). The Trajectories of Boredom: The Pitfalls of Being Over-challenged and Under-challenged in Mathematics Classroom. European Educational Research Association, 24 SES 14 A. https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/30/contribution/62948
Chevallard, Y. (2006). Steps Towards a New Epistemology in Mathematics Education. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 4), 21-30. Barcelona: FUNDEMI-IQS.
Chevallard, Y., & Bosch, M. (2020). Anthropological theory of the didactic (ATD). In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham., 2, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100034
Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M., & Kim, S. (2015). What is a Theory According to the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic? In CERME 9: Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, (2614–2620). Thematic Working Group 17: Theoretical Perspectives and Approaches in Mathematics Education Research. ⟨hal-01289424⟩
Farokhah, L., Herman, T., Wahyudin, W., & Abidin, Z. (2024). Global Research Trends of Mathematics Literacy in Elementary School: A Bibliometric Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 4(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v4i3.69019
Febrianti, M. D., Al-bahij, A., & Mufidah, M. (2024). Pentingnya Konteks dalam Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika pada Anak Sekolah Dasar Kelas 2. Prosiding SEMNASFIP, 1312-1320. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/SEMNASFIP/article/view/23724
Frey, R. F., Brame, C. J., Fink, A., & Lemons, P. P. Teaching Discipline-based Problem Solving. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 21(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-02-0030
Goetz, T., Bieleke, M., Yanagida T., Krannich, M., Roos, A-L., Frenzel, A. C., Lipnevich, A. A., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Test Boredom: Exploring a Neglected Emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(7), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000807
Hutneriana, R., Hidayah, I., Isnarto, Dwijanto, Wardono. (2024). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 7, 529-538. https://proceedings.unnes.ac.id/prisma/article/view/2999
Karjiyati, V., Supriatna, I., Agusdianita, N., & Yuliantini, N. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Model RME Pada Perkuliahan Konsep Dasar Geometri dan Pengukuran. Jurnal PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 15(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.15.1.49-56
Marcinek, T., Jakobsen, A., & Partová, E. (2023). Using MKT Measures for Crossnational Comparisons of Teacher Knowledge: Case of Slovakia and Norway. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 26, 303–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09530-3
Nurhasanah, R. (2024). Analisis Sajian Buku Teks Matematika pada Materi Luas Daerah Persegi dan Persegi Panjang Kelas IV berdasarkan Prakseologi. (Tesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). https://repository.upi.edu/121960/
Pansell, A. (2023). Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching as a Didactic Praxeology. Frontiers in Education, 8 (1165977). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1165977
Prabowo, A., Suparman, S., Li, C. S., Janan, D., & Damayanti, T.D. (2023). The Effect of Reading Literacy to Mathematics Comprehension of Elementary School Students in Indonesia and Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(1), 546-554. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.25714
Putri, D. L, Arigiyati, T. A. (2018). Efektivitas TGT terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia, 532-538. https://web.archive.org/web/20180415184854id_/http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/etnomatnesia/article/viewFile/2380/1341
Rahayu, T. G., Herman, T., & Prawiyogi, A. G. (2022). Teori dan Teknologi Materi Pecahan pada Buku Teks Matematika Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 27(2), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v27i2.45158
Rahmasari, N. V. D. & Zuchdi, D. (2021). Tinjauan Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi Materi Sastra dalam Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VIII. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(1), 111-117. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i1.22841
Renaldie, Z. (2023). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Kelas VII SMP Negeri 5 Cibitung pada Materi Bilangan Rasional. PENDEKAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 1(6), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.51903/pendekar.v1i6.483
Rezeki, T. I., & Sagala, R. W. (2021). Semiotics Analysis on Students’ English Textbook in Elementary School. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 120-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.29048/veles.v5i2.3855
Rizqi, M. M., Wijayanti, D., & Basir, M. A. (2021). Analisis Buku Teks Matematika Materi Himpunan Menggunakan Model Prakseologi. Delta Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 57-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.31941/delta.v9i1.1226
Saefurohman, S., Maryanti, R., Azizah, N.N., Al Husaeni, D.F., Wulandary, V., & Irawan, A.R. (2021). Efforts to Increasing Numeracy Literacy of Elementary School Students Through Quiziz Learning Media. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 3(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v3i1.38570
Saputri, J. R & Mampouw H.L. (2018). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Pecahan oleh Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Tahapan Polya. Math DIdactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v4i2.104
Scheiner, T. & Bowers, D. M. (2023). Problematizing The Metaphors of Unpacking, Deconstructing, and Decompressing Mathematics. For. Learn. Math. 43, 9–13. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=source%3A%22For+the+Learning+of+Mathematics%22&ff1=subMathematics+Instruction&id=EJ1385608
Scheiner, T., Godino, J. D., Montes, M. A., Pino-Fan, L. R., and Climent, N. (2022). On Metaphors in Thinking About Preparing Mathematics for Teaching. Educ. Stud. Math. 111, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-1 0154-4
Schwartze, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lohbeck, A., Bednorz, D., Kleine, M., & Pekrun, R. (2024). Boredom Due to Being Over-or Under-chanllenged in Mathematics: A Latent Profile Analysis. British Journal of Educatuonal Psychology, 94(3), 947-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12695
Siswanto, E. & Meiliasari. (2024). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Matematika: Systematic Literature Review, Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 8(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.081.06
Suprapto, E., Suryani, N., Siswandari, S., & Mardiyana, M. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Literacy Skill in Term of Gender Differences: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 2280. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.27224
Suryadi, D. (2025). Penelitian Desain Dedaktis (DDR) dan Implementasinya. GAPURA PRESS.
Susanto, R. E. (2024). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Masalah di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Ilmiah IPA dan Matematika, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.61116/jiim.v2i1.465
Takeuchi, H., & Shinno, Y. (2020). Comparing The Lower Secondary Textbooks of Japan and England: A Praxeological Analysis of Symmetry and Transformations in Geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09982-3
Utami, N.S., Prabawanto, S., and Suryadi, D. (2024). How Do Indonesian Students Learn Function Concepts? A Praxeological Analysis of Textbook. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(2), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i2.pp451-472
Wardana, L. C., Suryana, I. D., & Nandi, M. (2024). Integrating Real World Applications Into Mathematics Education: Approaches and Outcomes. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 1(2), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijmse.v1i2.88
Wijaya, T. T., Zhou, Y., Houghton, T., Weinhandl, R., Lavicza, Z., & Yusop, F. D. (2022). Factors Affecting the Use of Digital Mathematics Textbooks in Indonesia. Mathematics, 10(11), Article 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111808
Yahya, M. H., Raharjo, K., Ammarulloh, S., Putri, A. A., &Himawan, I. (2025). Kajian Penerapan Matriks dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar. Al-Aqlu: Jurnal Matematika, Teknik dan Sains, 3(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.59896/aqlu.v3i2.296
Yunianta, T.N.H., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Herman, T. (2023). Textbook praxeological-didactical analysis: Lessons learned from the Indonesian mathematics textbook. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp503-524
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Gefika Abdulrafi', Nurjanah Nurjanah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
