Miskonsepsi Matematis pada Soal Model PISA: Studi Kualitatif Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian STIFIn

Authors

  • Nabila Wardah Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember image/svg+xml
  • Indah Wahyuni Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/circle.v6i2.2616

Abstract

Mathematical literacy in PISA-model problems requires students to formulate, employ, and interpret mathematical concepts in various contexts. In practice, however, many students still demonstrate misconceptions that stem from differences in processing information and reasoning. This descriptive qualitative study aims to describe the variations in individual misconception patterns among seventh-grade students (Class VII D) at SMP Nuris Jember when solving PISA-model mathematics problems. The STIFIn personality typology framework (Sensing, Thinking, Intuiting, Feeling, Instinct) is utilized solely as a descriptive lens to contextualize the subjects, rather than as a causal variable or for population generalization. Nine subjects were selected purposively based on STIFIn test results to represent the five personality types and their subtypes. Data were gathered through a PISA-model test, task-based interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using technical triangulation by comparing written answers with verbal explanations. The findings illustrate specific variations across the investigated subjects: sensing subjects demonstrated strong oral articulation but lacked systematic written notations and procedures; thinking subjects showed relatively sound conceptual understanding but exhibited errors in chained computations and variable reduction within economic contexts; intuiting and instinct subjects showed a tendency to bypass formal procedural steps despite displaying evaluative reasoning; while feeling subjects consistently faced challenges with technical terms and mathematical symbols despite effectively conveying oral arguments. Because these findings represent single-case profiles for each investigated subtype, the observed patterns are not intended to generalize the characteristics of each STIFIn type. Instead, they provide preliminary insights for educators to better understand unique learning obstacles when designing more personalized remediation.

Keywords:

misconceptions; pisa-model questions; genetic characteristics; stifin.

References

Aini, N. N., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada soal cerita matematika berdasarkan teori Polya ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.35905/alifmatika.v2i1.1280.

Alindra, A. L. (2018). Kajian aksiologi metode STIFIn dalam pemetaan mesin kecerdasan manusia. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i1.13978

Amalia, N., Hanifah, R. R., & Yani, A. (2024). Analisis Peran Pendidikan Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Karakter Bangsa. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 10.

Anggrayani, H. D. L., & Fuady, A. (2023). Pengaruh resiliensi matematis dan motivasi belajar terhadap pemahaman konsep matematika peserta didik. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran, 18(30), 1–8.

Annizar, A. M., Lestari, A. C., Sofiah, Khairunnisa, G. F., & Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Proses berpikir inkuiri dalam menyelesaikan masalah Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) ditinjau dari tingkat kognitif. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(6), 1192–1204. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i6.1192-1204

Arfia, K., & Handican, R. (2024). Sensing Vs Intuiting: Analisa Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Menyelesaikan Masalah HOTS (Higher Order Thingking Skills). Jurnal Silogisme Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v9i2.10292

Fauzi, A. H., & Ribaah, R. Z. (2025). Analysis Of Mathematical Representation Of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers In Problem Solving Based On Thinking And Feeling Personality Types. International Conference on Humanity Education and Socia, 04(1).

Ginanjar, A. Y. (2019). Pentingnya Penguasaan Konsep Matematika Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di SD. Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA, 13(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v13i1.822

Gradini, E. (n.d.). Miskonsepsi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Dasar Di Dataran Tinggi Gayo. III(2), 52–60.

Handican, R., Laswadi, Jamaris Jamna, & Solfema. (2023). Thinking Trajectory of Students with Thinking and Feeling Personality Types in Solving Algebra Problems. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v6i1.53957

Humairah, A., Syaripah, S., & Septiana, A. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian MBTI (Myers–Briggs Type Indicator) Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di SMA Negeri 3 Rejang Lebong. In Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup.

Joefanny, L., Annas, M. K., Pratama, M. A., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. 5, 2099–2104.

Jubaeli, A., Andriani, N., Inayah, S., Mubarok, A. S., Mardhotillah, B., Ardianti, S., Amanda, R. Y., Walidain, S. N., & Frans, N. (2025). Pendidikan sebagai Proses Dinamis: Kajian Teoari dan Implementasi di Lembaga Pendidikan. UME Publishing.

Kamid, K., Sutrisno, S., Anwar, K., & Dewi, R. K. (2024). Proses Kognitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar dalam Memahami Materi Pecahan ditinjau dari Stifin Framework: Thinking dan Feeling. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v13i2.6249

Lutfiananda, I. M. A., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2014). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Open-Ended Siswa Berkepribadian STJ Dan NFJ Pada Materi Rata-rata Hitung. Mathe Dunesa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v3n2.p%25p

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f2388e-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7654f767-en

Pakpahan, R. Y. S., Sampoerno, P. D., & Haeruman, L. D. (2024). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis pada Materi Aljabar Kelas VII SMP Jakarta Selatan. JURNAL RISET PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SEKOLAH, 8(2), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.082.03

Poniman, F. (2016). Personaliti Genetik Penjelasan Hasil Tes STIFIn (Pikacinta (ed.); XIX). Yayasan STIFIn Bumi Makmur.

Pretz, J. E. (2021). Intuition versus analysis: Strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.554

Putri, R.I.I., & Zulkardi. (2020). Designing PISA-like mathematics task using Asian Games context.Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1),135-144. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9786.135-144

Qoiriyah, N., Susilo, D. A., & Hariyani, S. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Peserta Didik Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Prosedur Newman. Sigma, 6(2), 156. https://doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v6i2.1029

Radatz, H. (1950). Students ’ Errors in the Mathematical Learning Process : a Survey *. 1, 16–20.

Rahmawati, N. D., & Roesdiana, L. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Sma Pada Materi Turunan Fungsi Aljabar. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika (JES-MAT), 8(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v8i1.5579

Ramadany, L. D. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas V dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Bangun Ruang Berdasarkan Gender Di SD IT Mutiara Insan Sorong. 2(1).

Rohim, M. F., & Sari, A. F. (2019). Keterampilan Siswa Memecahkan Masalah Olimpiade Matematika Ditinjau dari Kepribadian Tipe Senising dan Intuiting. Jurnal Elemen, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i1.1047

Siregar, N., & Harahap, Y. S. (2021). Students’ Learning Achievement with Different STIFIN by using E-Learning Scientific Approach. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 30–38.

Sofiyah, K., Nasution, N. E., Amelia, A., & Hutagalung, L. A. (2025). Pengaruh Kesadaran Siswa Terhadap Pentingnya Matematika dalam Karir di Era Digital dan Ekonomi Berbasis Pengetahuan.

Suwarno, Silvatama, M. A., Joel I. Alvarez2, & Murtafiah, W. (n.d.). Analogical Reasoning of Sensing and Intuition Personality Student in Solving Proportion Problem: Two-Variable into Three-Variable Direct Proportion Word Problem.

Triani, V., & Deswita, R. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear Berdasarkan Kepribadian Thinking dan Feeling. MAXIMA : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30739/maxima.v2i2.3899

Usman, A., Saluky, Junaidin, Bhoki, H., Aran, A. M., Resti, D. E., Pondungge, A. W., Wahidin, D., Fatihah, N. A., Alamsyah, F., Munawaroh, S., & Saadah, A. (2025). Peluang dan Tantangan Pendidikan di Era Industri 4.0 dan Society 5.0 (N. A. Rahma (ed.); 1st ed.). PT Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup.

Wiryanto, W., & Anggraini, G. O. (2022). Analisis pendidikan humanistik Ki Hajar Dewantara dalam konsep kurikulum merdeka belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v15i1.41549

Downloads

Published

2026-10-05

Article Statistics

2 Views
1 Downloads

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Miskonsepsi Matematis pada Soal Model PISA: Studi Kualitatif Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian STIFIn. (2026). Circle: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.28918/circle.v6i2.2616