Strategi Badan Wakaf Indonesia (BWI) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf di Aceh Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/elhisbah.v5i2.12256Abstract
This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution strategies implemented by the Indonesian Waqf Board (Badan Wakaf Indonesia-BWI)Representative Office in Aceh and to assess their compliance with Islamic legal principles. The urgency of this study stems from the high potential for waqf disputes in Aceh, primarily due to incomplete administrative documentation and inadequate records of waqf assets. These conditions often trigger disputes between nazhir, wakif, and heirs, thereby requiring an effective, structured, and sharia-compliant dispute resolution mechanism. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach using document analysis and in-depth interviews with informants from BWI Aceh and academic experts. The data were analyzed thematically to identify patterns of dispute resolution and their relevance to the concepts of shulh and tahkim in Islamic law. The findings indicate that BWI Aceh prioritizes non-litigation mechanisms through mediation and arbitration. Mediation serves as the primary instrument, conducted through problem identification, facilitated dialogue, and negotiation until a mutually acceptable settlement is reached. Arbitration is applied when mediation does not produce an agreement. This approach aligns with Islamic values that emphasize deliberation, justice, and peace. These strategies have proven effective in resolving various types of disputes, including conflicts involving overlapping claims and differing interpretations of management rights. The study concludes that BWI Aceh’s strategy is consistent with Islamic legal principles and contributes to enhancing legal certainty and protecting waqf assets. Nevertheless, strengthening data management, disseminating regulations, and improving nazhir capacity remain necessary to ensure more optimal waqf dispute resolution.
Keywords:
References
Amriani, N. (2011). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arifin, M. S. (2020). Peranan Badan Wakaf Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Wakaf. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 4(1), 27–40.
Bell, E., Harley, B., & Bryman, A. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford university press.
Bogdan, A., Buckett, M. I., & Japuntich, D. A. (2014). Nano-sized aerosol classification, collection and analysis—method development using dental composite materials. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11(7), 415–426.
Bwi.go.id. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perwakafan. BWI.
Elyani, E., Nadirah, I., & Rosalina, M. (2024). The Role of The Indonesian Insurance Mediation Body (BMAI) in Resolving Insurance Conflicts. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(5), 1486–1494.
Faisal, F. (2021). Waqf Land Disputes and Alternative Settlements. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 2(3), 259–268.
Fuadi. (2021). Sertifikat Aset Wakaf dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf. Rineka Cipta .
Hasan, Is (2021). Hukum zakat dan wakaf di Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Hidayat, M. R., & Komarudin, P. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Wakaf Melalui Jalur Litigasi Dan Non-Litigasi. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 11(2), 184–196.
Lathif, A., & Habibaty, D. M. (2019). Disparitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Jalur Litigasi Pada Polis Asuransi Syariah Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 76–88.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2017). The lawyer’s role (s) in deliberative democracy. In Multi-Party Dispute Resolution, Democracy and Decision-Making (pp. 349–371). Routledge.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48.
Muaidi, M. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Hukum Ekonomi Syariâ€TM ah. Tafaqquh: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Ahwal Syahsiyah, 2(2), 1–23.
Mujahidin, A. (2021). Hukum wakaf di indonesia dan proses penanganan sengketanya. Prenada Media.
Mukharom, M., Triasih, D., & Septiandani, D. (2020). Peran Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 7(2).
Muslem, M., & Abd Samat, S. A. B. (2018). Mekanisme Majelis Tahkim Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Rumah Tangga (Analisis Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2003 Seksyen 48 Tentang Penambahan Kaedah-Kaedah Hakam Di Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia). Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 20(1), 75–93.
Nisa, K., Attin, S. N., Novitasari, A., & Nasoha, R. A. M. M. (2024). Analisis penyelesaian sengketa wakaf dalam perspektif hukum Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Al Hukmu: Journal of Islamic Law and Economics, 79–92.
Nurhayati, N. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 1–11.
Rizani, A. K., & Dakhoir, A. (2020). Musyawarah sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa waris beda agama: evidence based solution from Indonesia. El-Mashlahah, 10(2), 52–64.
Saryono, A. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Bidang Kesehatan. Yogyakarta, Nuha Medika.
Siwak.kemenag.go.id. (2025). Jumlah Tanah Wakaf Seluruh Indonesia. Siwak.Kemenag.Go.Id: Siwak.Kemenag.Go.Id/Persen-Jumlah-Tanah-Wakaf.Php.
Wicaksono, J. W. (2020). Pengelolaan Waqaf Tunai Di Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Dinar: Jurnal Prodi Ekonomi Syariah. http://www.e-jurnal.stail.ac.id/index.php/dinar/article/view/156
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ina Fatiya, Khairil Umuri, Muhammad Haris Riyaldi, Eka Nurlina, Muftahuddin Muftahuddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal El Hisbah : Journal of Islamic Economic Law by Faculty of Sharia, UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Central Java, Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share ” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt ” remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution ” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions ” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.







