Promoting Religious Moderation in New Media: Between Contestation and Claiming Religious Authority

Authors

  • Mahmud Yunus Postgraduate Program, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang
  • Firmanda Taufiq Graduate School, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Yogyakarta
  • Ahalla Tsauro Malays Studies Department, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences National University of Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v8i1.372

Keywords:

Contest, Digital Islam, Religious Authority, Religious Moderation

Abstract

Mainstreaming religious moderation has become crucial for Indonesian Muslims, particularly in the digital era. Experts agree that digital media is the most efficient and effective way of achieving this issue. To better understand the representation of Islam in Indonesia's digital sphere, this article aims to analyze content production by NU and Muhammadiyah, two of Indonesia's most prominent Islamic organizations. Using a Netnography approach and website analysis by Similarweb.com, this article analyzed the website's traffic, audience demographics (covering age and gender), and global standing. This information is used to investigate which social media network is most suited to disseminate ideas for religious moderation. According to the up-to-date statistics, nu.or.id is currently globally ranked 18,914, which places it well above muhammadiyah.or.id, which is positioned at the far more distant position of 140,435. Comparing December 2022 traffic and engagement statistics, nu.or.id had 4.169 million more visitors than muhammadiyah.or.id with 503,163 thousand visitors. The top country such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the United States, Singapore, and Germany perform admirably. The two sides are statistically about even when looking at viewer demographics. Based on these metrics, content created by nu.or.id that promotes religious moderation has a more powerful of being shared extensively. We believe there is potential for a stronger impact on mainstreaming religious moderation in Indonesia and globally if these two organizational platforms are integrated.

References

Adami, E. (2015). What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity. Visual Communication, 14(2), 133–153.

Akmaliah, W., Sulistiyanto, P., & Sukendar. (2022). Making Moderate Islam in Indonesia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–15.

Alatas, I. F. (2021). What is religious authority?: Cultivating Islamic communities in Indonesia (Vol. 85). Princeton University Press.

Ali, M. (2015). The Muhammadiyah’s 47th Congress and “Islam Berkemajuan.” Studia Islamika, 22(2), 377–386.

Arifinsyah, A., Andy, S., & Damanik, A. (2020). The urgency of religious moderation in preventing radicalism in Indonesia. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 21(1), 91–108.

Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2023, from https://apjii.or.id/berita/d/survei-apjii-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-tembus-215-juta-orang

Asroor, Z. (2019). Islam Transnasional vs Islam Moderat: Upaya NU dan MD dalam Menyuarakan Islam Moderat di Panggung Dunia. AT-TURAS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(2), 171–213.

Burhani, A. N. (2018). Pluralism, liberalism, and islamism: Religious outlook of muhammadiyah. Studia Islamika, 25(3), 433–470.

Bush, R. (2009). Nahdlatul Ulama and the struggle for power within Islam and politics in Indonesia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Campbell, H. (2010). When religion meets new media. Routledge.

Campbell, H. (Ed.). (2012). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.

Campbell, H. A. (2020). Digital creatives and the rethinking of religious authority. Routledge.

Campbell, H. A., & Evolvi, G. (2020). Contextualizing current digital religion research on emerging technologies. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.149

Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (2021). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295683

Cheong, P. H. (2016). Religious authority and social media branding in a culture of religious celebrification. The Media and Religious Authority, 81–104.

Cheong, P. H. (2017). The vitality of new media and religion: Communicative perspectives, practices, and changing authority in spiritual organization. New Media & Society, 19(1), 25–33.

Cheong, P. H., Fischer-Nielsen, P., Gelfgren, S., & Ess, C. (2012). Digital religion, social media and culture: Perspectives, practices, and futures (Vol. 7800). Peter Lang.

Dr. Eriyanto, M. S. ; (2021). Metode Netnografi: Pendekatan Kualitatif dalam Memahami Budaya Pengguna Media Sosial (Bandung). Remaja Rosdakarya. //perpustakaan.kemendagri.go.id%2Fopac%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D7124

Engholm, I., & Klastrup, L. (2010). Websites as artefacts: A new model for website analysis. 2.

Evolvi, G. (2022). Religion and the internet: Digital religion, (hyper)mediated spaces, and materiality. Zeitschrift Fur Religion, Gesellschaft Und Politik, 6(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41682-021-00087-9

Fealy, G., & Bush, R. (2014). The political decline of traditional ulama in Indonesia: The state, umma and Nahdlatul Ulama. Asian Journal of Social Science, 42(5), 536–560.

Gifford, P. (2005). Religious authority: Scripture, tradition, charisma. In The Routledge companion to the study of religion (pp. 391–403). Routledge.

Hasbullah, M. (2014). A century of NU-Muhammadiyah in Indonesia: The failure of Islamic modernism? Islamika Indonesiana, 1(1), 17–32.

Hefni, W. (2020). Moderasi beragama dalam ruang digital: Studi pengarusutamaan moderasi beragama di perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam negeri. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 13(1), 1–22.

Hidayatullah, M. S., Dimyathi, M. S., Abdullah, Z., & Handayani, R. (2020). The Cyber Islam Contestation In Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 34–44.

@IBTimes.dot.ID. (2020, July 10). 100 Situs Islam Indonesia, NU Online Peringkat Pertama. IBTimes.ID. https://ibtimes.id/100-situs-islam-indonesia-nu-online-peringkat-pertama/

Indonesia Masuk Daftar 10 Negara Pengguna Internet Terbesar di Asia | Databoks. (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2023, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/12/22/indonesia-masuk-daftar-10-negara-pengguna-internet-terbesar-di-asia

Ismail, F. (2011). The nahdlatul ulama: Its early history and contribution to the establishment of Indonesian State. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 5(2), 247–282.

Jubba, H., Awang, J., & Sungkilang, S. A. (2021). The Challenges of Islamic Organizations in Promoting Moderation in Indonesia. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v6i1.12948

Kamali, M. H. (2015). The middle path of moderation in Islam: The Qur’anic principle of wasatiyyah. Oxford University Press.

Kozinets, R. (2019). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Netnography, 1–472.

Kozinets, R. V., Dolbec, P.-Y., & Earley, A. (2014). Netnographic analysis: Understanding culture through social media data. Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 262–275.

Kühle, L., & Larsen, T. L. (2021). ‘Forced’ Online Religion: Religious Minority and Majority Communities’ Media Usage during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Religions, 12(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070496

Kuru, A. T. (2019). Islam, authoritarianism, and underdevelopment: A global and historical comparison. Cambridge University Press.

Lövheim, M., & Campbell, H. A. (2017). Considering critical methods and theoretical lenses in digital religion studies. New Media & Society, 19(1), 5–14.

Lundby, K., & Evolvi, G. (2021). Theoretical frameworks for approaching religion and new media. In Digital religion (pp. 233–249). Routledge.

Mandaville, P. (2001). Reimagining Islam in diaspora: The politics of mediated community. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 63(2–3), 169–186.

Mandaville, P. (2003). Communication and diasporic Islam: A virtual ummah? In The media of diaspora (pp. 135–147). Routledge.

Mashuri, A. T., Lubis, A. R., & Moefad, A. M. (2023). Construction of Religious Moderation at Nahdlatul Ulama Online Media in East Java. MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial, 6(1), 71–86.

Midden, E., & Ponzanesi, S. (2013). Digital faiths: An analysis of the online practices of Muslim women in the Netherlands. Women’s Studies International Forum, 41, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.07.012

Misrawi, Z. (2010). Pandangan Muslim Moderat: Toleransi, Terorisme, dan Oase Perdamaian. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Muhajir, A. (2018). Membangun Nalar Islam Moderat: Kajian Metodologis. Situbondo: Tanwirul Afkar.

Mustofa, M. Y., Mamnunah, & Rospitasari, M. (2023). Book Review: Heidi A Campbell and Ruth Tsuria (eds), Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media.

Mustofa, M. Y., Mas’ud, A., & Elizabeth, M. Z. (2022). The Future Direction on Pesantren’s Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, Dan Kearsipan, 10(1).

Mustofa, M. Y., Nadhifah, N., Djamil, A., & Irsyad, M. F. (2023). A Critical Analysis of Auguste Comte’s Positivism for Islamic Digital Research. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 12(1), 1–18.

Mutohar, A., Apriliana, E., & Mustofa, M. (2023). Youths and the Dynamics of Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in Semarang. Proceedings of the 2nd Multidisciplinary International Conference, MIC 2022, 12 November 2022, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.

Njoto-Feillard, G. (2014). Financing Muhammadiyah: The Early Economic Endeavours of a Muslim Modernist Mass Organization in Indonesia (1920s-1960s). Studia Islamika, 21(1), 1–46.

Rohman, D. A. (2021). Moderasi Beragama Dalam Bingkai Keislaman Di Indonesia. Lekkas.

Safi, O. (2006). The politics of knowledge in premodern Islam: Negotiating ideology and religious inquiry. Univ of North Carolina Press.

Schaefer, S. (2021). Islam Nusantara: The Conceptual Vocabulary of Indonesian Diversity. Islam Nusantara: Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture, 2(2), 1–16.

Sihombing, A. A., Abdullah, I., & Prasojo, Z. H. (2020). Nostra aetate and space for religious moderation: Interfaith dialogue in multicultural Indonesia. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 19(55), 142–157.

Starrett, G. (1994). Brinkley Messick, The Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim Society, Comparative Studies on Muslim Societies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993). Pp. 353. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 26(2), 347–349.

Suksida, T., & Santiworarak, L. (2017). A study of website content in webometrics ranking of world university by using similar web tool. 480–483.

Taufiq, F., & Alkholid, A. M. (2021). Peran Kementerian Agama dalam mempromosikan moderasi beragama di era digital. Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah.

Umar, H. N. (2021). Islam Nusantara: Jalan panjang moderasi beragama di Indonesia. Elex Media Komputindo.

Wahid, K. A. (2001). Menggerakkan Tradisi; Esai-esai Pesantren. LKIS Pelangi Aksara.

Weber, M. (1968). On charisma and institution building (Vol. 322). University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

21-06-2023

How to Cite

Mahmud Yunus, Firmanda Taufiq, & Ahalla Tsauro. (2023). Promoting Religious Moderation in New Media: Between Contestation and Claiming Religious Authority. Edukasia Islamika, 8(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v8i1.372