Spiritualitas Sains Modern: Pembacaan Terhadap Relasi Agama dan Sains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/pn95ks54Abstract
Modern science receives diverse responses from religionists. This is motivated by the reading of religious texts, which are often considered contrary to recent scientific research. The advancement of modern science is not connected with improvements in spirituality. Spirituality becomes another dimension of science. In that situation, the integration theory of Ian G. Barbour attempts to unravel the patterns of the relationship between modern science and religion. There are four types of relationships: conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration. This approach is rarely implemented in the realm of Islamic studies. This research seeks to implement the approach in Islamic studies by using a descriptive-analytical method. The authors found that the tendency of Muslim scientists is more dominant in the exploration of Islamic studies than in the scientific aspect. Therefore, the dominant relationship between science and religion is conflict, dialogue, and natural theology. The contributing factors are the educational background of Muslim scientists, which is predominantly in religious studies; the limitations of interdisciplinary studies; and the lack of openness and renewal of views (tajdīd) on religious texts.
Keywords:
References
Al-Būṭī, M. S. R. (2004). Kubrā al-Yaqīniyyāt al-Kauniyah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Jāḥiz. (1965). Muqaddimah Taḥqīq Al-Ḥayawān (Vol. 1). Mesir: Maktabah Mustafa Al-Bābi al-Ḥalabī.
Arifin, Z. (2008). Model-Model Relasi Agama dan Sains. PSIKOISLAMIKA.
Bagir, Z. A. (2002). “Riwayat Barbour, Riwayat Sains dan Agama.” In Juru Bicara Tuhan Antara Sains dan Agama. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Barbour, I. G. (2002). Juru Bicara Tuhan Antara Sains dan Agama. Bandung: Pustaka Mizan.
Barbour, I. G. (2005). Menemukan Tuhan dalam Sains Kontemporer dan Agama. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Chapman, A. R. (2007). “Sains, Agama, dan Lingkungan.” In R. L. Petersen & B. Smith-Moran (Eds.), D. Basuki & G. Admiranto (Trans.), Bumi yang Terdesak: Perspektif Ilmu dan Agama Mengenai Konsumsi, Populasi, dan Keberlanjutan. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Cobb Jr, J. (1965). A Christian Natural Theology, Based on the Thought of Alfred North Whitehead. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Darda, A. (2016). Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama: Perkembangan Konseptual di Indonesia. At-Ta'dib, 10(1).
Fitzgerald, S. (2007). The Scopes Trial: The Battle over Teaching Evolution. Capstone.
Gilkey, L. (1959). Maker of Heaven and Earth: A Study of the Christian Doctrine of Creation. New York: Doubleday.
Haught, J. F. (2004). Perjumpaan Sains dan Agama: Dari Konflik ke Dialog. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Hossein Nasr, S. (1983). Islam dan Nestapa Manusia Modern. Bandung: Pustaka.
Kartanegara, M. (2007). Mengislamkan Nalar: Sebuah Respon terhadap Modernitas. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Khasinah, S. (2013). Hakikat Manusia Menurut Pandangan Islam dan Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 13(2).
Mahzar, A. (2005). Integrasi Sains dan Agama: Model dan Metodologi. In Integrasi Ilmu dan Agama: Interpretasi dan Aksi. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka.
Nasr, S. H. (1968). The Encounter of Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man. George Allen & Unwin Limited.
Nikki, K. (1972). Sayyid Jamal Al-Dīn Al-Afghānī: A Political Biography. Berkeley.
Schuon, F. (1965). Light on the Ancient Worlds. Perennial Books.
Syahrūr, M. (1990). Al-Kitāb wa Al-Qurān. Damaskus.
Ziadat, A. A. (1986). Western Science in the Arab World: The Impact of Darwinism. London: MacMillan.
Downloads
Published
Article Statistics
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



