POLA PEMALSUAN SANAD DALAM PERIWAYATAN HADIS: Pandangan Muhaddiś˚n dan Orientalis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/y2d78v28Abstract
This study aimed to address three issues: [1] how the orientalists think of forgery pattern of sanad in hadith transmission; [2] how the muhaddiśūn think of forgery pattern of sanad in hadith transmission; and [3] what the similarities and differences are between the views of the orientalists and muhaddiśūn on forgery pattern of sanad. The results of this study indicate that in general the view of the muhaddiśūn and orientalists on the counterfeiting of sanad are very fundamental difference. Although the forgery patterns of sanad identified by the muhaddiśūn and orientalist are similar, their views are very different. It is because the orientalist approach is skeptic that does not recognize the existence of the original matan sourced from the Prophet Pbuh, so that it gives a major influence on the different methods used by orientalists and muhaddiśūn to analyze hadith, especially the isnaad aspect.
Keywords:
References
‘Abr al-Ṣamad b. Bakr ‘Ābid. 2001. al-Waḍ‘u wa al-Waḍḍā‘īn fi al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī. Madinah: Dār al-Hijrah.
‘Umar b. Ḥasan ‘Uṡmān Fallāṭah. 1981. al-Waḍ‘u fi al-Ḥadīṡ. 4 j. Damaskus: Maktabah al-Ghazālī.
Abādī, Muhammad Abū al-Layth al-Khayr. 2005. ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ: Aṣīluhā wa Mu‘āṣirah cet 4. Selangor: Darul Syakir.
Abū Ghuddah, ‘Abd al-Fattāḥ. 2008. Lamḥāt min Tārīkh al-Sunnah wa ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirut: Maktabah al-Maṭbū‘ah al-Islāmiyyah.
Abū Syuhbah, Muḥammad. 1989. al-Waḍ‘u fi al-Ḥadīṡ. Kairo: Maktabah al-Sunnah.
al-A‘ẓamī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafā. 1978. Studies in Early Ḥadīth Literature: With a Critical Edition of Some Early Texts. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications.
al-A‘ẓamī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafā. 1996. On Schacht’s Origin of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies dan The Islamic Texts Society.
al-A‘ẓamī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafā. 2002. Studies in Ḥadīṡ Metodology and Literature. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
al-Asyqar, ‘Umar Sulayman. 2004. al-Waḍ‘u fi al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī. Jordania: Dār al-Nafā’is.
al-Quḍāh, Syaraf dan Amin al-Quḍāh. 1985. Asbāb Ta‘addud al-Riwāyāt fi Matn al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī al-Syarīf. Jordan: Dār al-Furqān.
Wuraykāt, ‘Abd al-Karīm. 2000. al-Wahm fi Riwāyat al-Mukhtalif al-Aṡār. Riyadh: Adwā’ al-Salaf.
Arif, Syamsuddin. 2005. Gugatan Orientalis terhadap Hadits dan Gaungnya di Dunia Islam. AL-INSAN: Jurnal Kajian Islam, no. 2, vol. 1.
as-Suyūṭī, Abū al-Faḍl Jalāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. 2002. Tadrīb al-Rāwī fī Syarḥ Taqrīb al-Nawāwī. Abū ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Ṣalāḥ b. Muḥammad b. ‘Uwayḍah (ed.), 2 j., c. 3. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
at-Thahawi. 1998. Syarḥ Musykil al-Atsar. Syu’aib al-Arna’uth (ed.). Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah.
Bahā’ al-Dīn, Muḥammad. 1999. al-Mustasyriqūn wa al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī. Urdun: Dār al-Nafā’is li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzī‘.
Berg, Herbert. 2000. The Development of Exegesis in Early Islam. Surrey: Curzon Press.
Biqā’ī, ‘Alī Nayf. 2001. Dirāsah Asānīd al-Ḥadīth al-Syarīf. Beirut: Dār al-Basyā’ir al-Islāmiyyah.
Cook, Michael. 1981. Early Muslim Dogma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallaq, Wael B. 1999. The Authenticity of Prophetic Ḥadīth: a Pseudo-problem. Studia Islamica, vol. 89.
Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad b. ‘Alī. 1995. Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb. Ṣidqī Jamīl al-‘Aṭṭār (ed.), 12 j. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Juynboll, G.H.A. 1983. Muslim Tradition: Studies in Chronology, Provenance and Authorship of Early Hadith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Juynboll, G.H.A. 1996. Studies on The Origins and Uses of Islamic Hadith. Britain: Variorum.
Motzki, Harald, et al. 2004. Hadith: Origins and Development. Britain: Variorum.
Motzki, Harald. 2005. Dating Muslim Traditions: A Survey. Arabica, vol. LII, no. 2.
Schacht, Joseph. 1959. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. c. 3. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Suharto, Ugi. 2002. The Ṣaḥīfah of Hammām b. Munabbih and Its Contents in The Muṣannaf of ‘Abd al-Razzāq (d. 211/862): A Preliminary Note on Motzki’s Origin. AL-SYAJARAH, vol. 7, no. 1. Malaysia: ISTAC.
Ṣiddīqī, Muḥammad Zubayr. 1993. Hadith Literature: Its Origin, Development, Special Features. Abdal Hakim Murad (ed.). Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society.
Downloads
Published
Article Statistics
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



