THE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NOTE TAKING PAIRS IN TEACHING READING (Case Study in STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 Academic Year)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v12i2.10069Abstract
This research is intended to know whether: (1) Note Taking Pairs is more effective than Direct Instructional Method to teach reading; (2) Students who have high interest have better reading skill than students who have low interest; and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and students’ interest in teaching reading. The method which was applied in this research was Experimental study. It was conducted at STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 Academic Year. The population was the English 3 Students of STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 Academic Year. It consists of four classes (128 students). The writer used cluster random sampling to get the sample. It consists of two classes: (1) 32 students of A class, and (2) 32 students of B class. The data analysis shows the following findings : (1) Note Taking Pairs is more effective than Direct Instructional Method for teaching reading to the English 3 students of STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 academic year; (2) The students who have high interest have better reading skill than the students who have low interest of the English 3 students of STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 academic year; and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and students’ interest in teaching reading to the English 3 students of STAIN Pekalongan in the 2013/2014 academic year.Hopefully, the result of this research will be useful for lecturers in order to choose and determine the suitable teaching method used in their class.
Keywords:
References
Aebarsold, Jo Ann, and Field, Mary Lee. 1997. From Reader to Reading Teacher. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Alderson, J., Charles. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arends, Richard I. 1997. Classroom Instruction Management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies. Inc.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Bina Aksara
Barkley, Elizabeth F, Cross, K. Patricia, and Major, Claire Howell. 2006.
Collaborative Learning Technique. London: Pearson Longman
Becker, Wesley C. 2001. Journal of Direct Instruction in
http://www.google.co.id/#hl=id&q=disadvantages+of+direct+ins truction+method+in+teaching+reading.+pdf&meta=&aq=&oq=di sadvantages+of+direct+instruction+method+in+teaching+reading.
+pdf&fp=3c535af0b522fb05
Brown, H Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition. New York. Addison Wesley Longman. Inc.
. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc.
Carrell, P. L. 1988. Some Causes of Text-Boondedness and Schema-Inference in ESL
Reading. In P. Carrell, J. Devine & D. Eskey (Eds), Interactive Approches to Second Language Reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, Larry B. 2000. Experimental Methodology. University Michingan: Allyn and Bacon, In corporated
Colgan, Mark. 2010. Ten Cooperative Learning Technique for Building Classroom Communities. Taylor University, Upland. IN
Crow L and Crow A. 1989. Educational Psychology-translated by Abd Rachman. Yogyakarta: Nur Cahaya
DeBoer, John J, and Dallman, Martha. 1966. The Teaching of Reading. New York. Holt, Rinehart and Winson, Inc.
Definition of need in aspect of interest. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/need
Ferguson, George and Yoshio Takane. 1989. Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. New York: Mc Graw Hill, Inc
Fraenkel, E Jack and Wallen, E Norman. 1993. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Mc Graw Hall
Gersten, Russel & Carnine, Dauglas. 1986. Direct Instruction in Reading Comprehension
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson Longman.
Harmer, J. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching-fourth edition. London: Pearson Longman
Harrock & Mussman (In Developmental Trens in Wishes, Confidence, & The Sense of Personal Control from Childhood to Middle maturity in Journal of Psychology, 1973, 84, 241-252)
Hornby, As. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary – sixth edition. New York: Oxford University Press
Hurlock, Elizabeth B. 1983.Child Development. New Jersey: Mc Graw Hill
Johnson, D., R., Johnson, and K. Smith. 1998. Active Learning: Cooper- ation in the College Classroom, 2nd ed., Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
Joyce, Bruce and Weil, Marsha. 1992. Models of Teaching. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kiewra, K. A. 1987. The assessment of cognitive factors in academic abilities. In R.
R. Ronning, J. A. Glover, J. C. Conoley, & J. C. Witt (Eds.), The influence of cognitive psychology on testing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kenny, Dianna T. 1980. Direct Instruction: An Overview of Theory and Practice.
Journal of the Association of Special Education Teacher. in http://www.google.co.id/#hl=id&q=definition+of+Direct+Instru ction+method.+pdf&start=10&sa=N&fp=3c535af0b522fb05
Kozloff, Martin A and LaNunziata, Louise. 1999. Direct Instruction in Education. Wilmington. University of North Carolina in http://www.google.co.id/#hl=id&q=definition++of+Direct+Instr uction+method.+pdf&start=20&sa=N&fp=3c535af0b522fb05
Larsen-Freeman, Diana and Michel H. Long. 1991. An Introduction to second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman
Lee, Chao & Chen in Global Journal of Engineering Education Vol 13, no. 3 2011
Mason, Emanuel J. and William J. Brambel. 1997. Research in Education. Dubuque: Brown & Benchmark
McKeachie, W.J, Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., & Lin, Y.G. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Mehrens,William and Irvin J. Lehmann. 1978. Measurement and Evaluation in
Education and Psychology. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston
Ngadiso. 2006. Statistics-ELT Research II. Surakarta: English Education Department
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). Reciprocal Teaching in Teaching Reading as Thinking. Oak
Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
Pang. Elizabeth S, et al. Teaching Reading. France. SADAG. Bellegarde in
http://www.ibe.unesco.org/publications/EducationalPracticesSerie sPdf/prac12e.pdf
Princeton.edu. Definition of enjoyment.
www.wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Rayner, Keith and Alexander Pollastek. 1989. The psychology of Reading. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Robinson, H Alan. 1975. Teaching Reading and Study Strategies: The Content Areas. Boston. Allyin and Bacon Inc.
Rumelhart. Analysis of schema theory and its influence on reading. http://www.linguist.org.cn/doc/uc200711/uc20071104.pdf
Santrock, John W. 2008. Educational Psychology: Third Edition. New York.
McGrawHill
Smith, Frank. 1971. Understanding Reading: A Psychollinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston
Sujanto, Agus. 1986. Psikologi Perkembangan: cet. ke-. Jakarta: Aksara Baru
The WAC Journal-vol 16: September 2005. Note Taking and Learning: A Summary of Research. Francoise Boch, Stenhal University and Annie Piolat, University of Pravence
Tuckman, Bruce W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research: Second Edition. New York. Harcourt Brace Javanovich, Inc.
Ur, Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valiathan, Martin A and LaNunziata, Louis. 2009. Direct Instruction Works! (Benefit of Expository E-Learning). Singapore: Knowledge Platform
Vockell, Edward L. 1983. Educational Research. New York: Macmillan Publishing, Co.Inc.
Weir, Cyril. 1990. Communicative Language Testing. Great Britain: Prentice Hall
William, Eddie. 1996. Reading in the Language Classroom. Malaysia: International Book Distributors Ltd.
Downloads
Published
Article Statistics
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Jurnal Penelitian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
