Upaya Kelompok Ektrimis Untuk Menunggangi Isu Palestina-Israel: Analisis Diskursus Terhadap Narasi Kelompok Pro-Khilafah

Authors

  • Nurhidayat Criminology, University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/.v3i1.342

Keywords:

Extremism, Palestinian Issues, Discourse Analysis, narrative, pro-khilafah

Abstract

In Indonesia, as the country with the largest Muslim population in the world, there has also been a strong and massive reaction to what happened in Palestine. Ismail Fahmi, through his social network analysis on social media Twitter, found that the Palestinian-Israeli issue was in fact being ridden by pro-khilafah groups. This paper attempts to study pro-khilafah groups that are trying to ride on the Palestinian-Israeli issue. The approach adopted in this paper is qualitative by using the netnographic method. Netnography is the application of ethnography in cyber space to examine the culture and behavior that occur in computer-based activities. In the midst of this struggle for influence in the narrative of defense of Palestine, there is one small group which, if not observed closely, can freely raise a theme which is quite dangerous: the caliphate. This small group moves among other Palestinian support groups. The pro-khilafah narrative emphasizes elements of Islamic identity rather than humanitarian issues. He blatantly tried to draw a line of distinction between Judaism and Islam. From there, then the pro-khilafah activists entered into their ultimate goal, which is to promote the caliphate as a solution to the problems of the Palestinian people. The narratives built by the supporters of the caliphate are generally accompanied by the hashtags #khilafahsolusipalestina and #palestinaneedskhilafah. Widespread public support for Palestine is used by a few groups to smuggle their pro-caliphate agenda. This group, although small, has its audience, including women. The pro-khilafah promote war as an attraction for men who want action, and elements of the safety of Palestinian families, children and women for female audiences.

References

(Benford and Snow 2000; Foucault 1965; Foucault, 1988; Hemphill, Libby, Aron Culotta 2013; Johnston et al. 2020; Leurs 2007; Murray 1975; Saxton et al. 2015; Sharp and Richardson 2001; Soules 2022; Conboy, K. 2008; Foucault, M. 2012; Marvasti, A. 2004; Nainggolan, P. P. 2017; Said, E. 2001; Baconi, T. 2018; Kozinets, R. V. 2020; Wardoyo, B. 2006; Rahman, A. 2021; Aisha, N. M., & Biceroglu, E. 2021)

Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:611–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.

Foucault, Michel. 1965. “Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, Trans.” Richard Howard (New York: Pantheon, 1965) 70.

Foucault, Michel. 1988. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage.

Hemphill, Libby, Aron Culotta, Matthew Heston. 2013. “Keywords.” (Framing in Social Media: How the U.S. Congress uses Twitter hashtags to frame political issues):1–30. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2317335.

Johnston, Melissa Frances, Muhammad Iqbal, and Jacqui True. 2020. “The Lure of (Violent) Extremism: Gender Constructs in Online

Recruitment and Messaging in Indonesia.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 0(0):1–19. doi: 10.1080/1057610X.2020.1759267.

Leurs, Koen. 2007. “Framing Terrorism Good versus Evil ?” Utrecht University.

Murray, s. Davis. 1975. “Reviewed Work (s): Frame Analysis : An Essay on the Organization of Experience . by Erving Goffman Review by : Murray S . Davis Published by : American Sociological Association Stable URL : Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/2064021.” Contemporary Sociology 4(6):599–603.

Saxton, Gregory D., Jerome N. Niyirora, Chao Guo, and Richard D. Waters. 2015. “#AdvocatingForChange: The Strategic Use of Hashtags in Social Media Advocacy.” Advances in Social Work 16(1):154–69. doi: 10.18060/17952.

Sharp, Liz, and Tim Richardson. 2001. “Reflections on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in Planning and Environmental Policy Research.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 3(3):193–209. doi: 10.1002/jepp.88.

Soules, Michael J. 2022. “The Tradeoffs of Using Female Suicide Bombers.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 39(1):3–23. doi: 10.1177/0738894220948506.

Conboy, K. 2008. Intel II: Medan Tempur Kedua. Jakarta: Pustaka Primatama

Foucault, M. 2012. Arkeologi Pengetahuan. (I. R. Muzir, Trans.) Jogjakarta: IRCiSoD

Marvasti, A. 2004. Qualitative Research in Sociology. London: Sage

Nainggolan, P. P. 2017. Ancaman ISIS di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor

Said, E. 2001. Oriantelisme. (A. Hikmat, Trans.) Bandung: Pustaka

Solahudin. 2011. NII Sampai JI: Salafy Jihadisme di Indonesia. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.

Baconi, T. 2018. Hamas Contained: The Rise and Pacification of Palestinian Resistance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kozinets, R. V. 2020. “Netnography Today: A Call to Evolve, Embrace, Energize, and Electrify.” Dalam Netnography Unlimited: Understanding Technoculture using Qualitative Social Media Research, diedit oleh Robert V. Kozinets & Rossella Gambetti. New York: Routledge.

Wardoyo, B. 2006. “Pemerintah Hamas dan Prospek Perdamaian.” Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 8(2), 79-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v8i2.254

Rahman, A. 2021, Mei 22. Kampanye Khilafah dalam Isu Palestina. Diperoleh dari https://pers.droneemprit.id/kampanye-khilafah-dalam-isu-palestina/

Aisha, N. M., & Biceroglu, E. 2021, Mei 19. Gaza death toll from Israeli attacks rises to 230, including 65 children. Diperoleh dari https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/gaza-death-toll-from-israeli-attacks-rises-to-230-including-65-children/2246988

Published

2023-06-08

Issue

Section

Artikel