Estimasi G-Study dalam Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tahsinul Qur’an

Authors

  • Irfa Ma’alina Li’illiyyina Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Badrun Kartowagiran Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v4i2.2296

Keywords:

Instrumen, Tahsin al-Quran, Generalizability Theory, Edu-G

Abstract

This paper focuses on performance tests (performance tests) in the assessment of the Tahsin al-Qur'an certification exam using one rater in each assistance group. The assessment process that involves a rater on a performance test (performance test) has a great chance of giving birth to inconsistencies in giving rater assessments to different individuals with the same ability. This paper tries to solve this problem by developing instruments for two or more rater. This compilation process uses a quantitative analysis with generalizability theory approach and uses the help of the EduG version 6.1 program. This study shows that the examination of the tahsinul quran assessment instrument is said to be valid with aiken index value> 0.67 on each indicator. The reliability test on this instrument shows the reliability coefficient value> 0.80 for both limited and large sample trials. Based on these things, the assessment instrument of tahsinul quran can be said to be valid and reliable to measure the tahsin al-quran, and can minimize the subjectivity of the rater in making an assessment.

References

Adinugraha, Ema Hidayanti, Agus Riyadi, H. H., Hidayanti, E., & Riyadi, A. (2018). Fenomena Integrasi Ilmu di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri: Analisis Terhadap Konsep Unity of Sciences di UIN Walisongo Semarang. HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v4i1.1267

Aiken, L. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (45), 131–142.

Arifa, L. N. (2017). Perubahan STAIN/ IAIN Menjadi UIN Sebagai Bentuk Pengembangan Pendidikan Tinggi Islam (Contoh Kasus Perubahan STAIN menjadi UIN Malang Perspektif Manajemen Perubahan Kurt Lewin). Vicratina, Vol 01(02), 27–42.

Azwar, S. (2015). Tes Prestasi: Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar (4 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2016). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Bahrudin, & Kumaidi. (2014). Model Asesmen Musabaqah Tilawah al-Quran (MTQ) Cabang Tilawah. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Vol. 18 (2), 153–167.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Riset Pendidikan: Perencanaan, Pelaksanaan, dan Evaluasi Riset Kualitatif & Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Faiz, A. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian tahfidz Al-Qur’an di FITK UNSIQ Wonosobo (Tesis). UNY Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Graham, S., Hebert, M., Paige Sandbank, M., & Harris, K. R. (2016). Assessing the Writing Achievement of Young Struggling Writers: Application of Generalizability Theory. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714555019.

Haramain, M. I. N. (2017, Maret 26). Pra-Observasi Ujian Sertikasi PKTQ [Panduan Wawancara].

Idris, D. (2007). Teknik Penilaian Pembelajaran Dengan Menggunakan Passing Grade. JMSK: Jurnal Matematika, Statistika & Komputasi, Vol. 4 (No. 2), 26–29.

Jiang, Z., & Skorupski, W. (2018). A Bayesian approach to estimating variance components within a multivariate generalizability theory framework. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2193–2214. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0986-3.

Lumaurridlo. (2019). Estimasi Keandalan Penilaian Munaqosah. Jurnal Tawadhu, Vol. 3 (1), 665–673.

Lusiana, D., & Lestari, W. (2013). Instrumen Penilaian Afektif Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa Mata Pelajaran PKN SMK. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, Vol. 2(1), 1–6.

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & Evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Matondang, Z. (2009). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa, Vol.6 (No. 1), 87–97.

Muh. Idris. (2009). STAIN/ IAIN Menuju UIN (Perspektif Pemikiran Pendidikan A. Malik Fadjar). Jurnal Iqra’, Vol. 3 (1), 21–36.

Muslim, A. (2012). Ashobiyah Ibn Khaldun: Konsep Perubahan Sosial Di Indonesia. Sulesana, Vol. 7 (2), 138–148.

Mustopa. (2019, November 15). Menakar Kemampuan Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an Mahasiswa UIN. Diambil dari Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf al-Quran, Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia website: https://lajnah.kemenag.go.id/berita/513-menakar-kemampuan-baca-tulis-al-qur-an-mahasiswa-uin

Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir panduan untuk peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.

Rohmah, M. (2017, April 15). Hasil Observasi [Panduan Observasi].

Setiawan, A. (2016). Hermeneutika al-Quran “Mahzab Yogyaâ€: Telaah atas Teori Ma’na-Cum-Maghza dalam Penafsiran al-Quran. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu al-Qur’an dan Hadis, Vol. 17 (No. 1), 69–96.

TIM 10 PKTQ. (2015). Pengembangan Kepribadian dan Tahsinul Quran. Yogyakarta: PKTQ FTIK UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

TIM 10 PKTQ. (2017). Petunjuk Teknis Ujian Sertifikasi PKTQ. PKTQ FTIK UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Zuhaida, A. (2018). Penyusunan Instrumen Analisis Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru IPA Madrasah Tsanawiyah Terintegrasi Konten Islami. Edukasia Islamika, 234–248. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v3i2.1690.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2019

How to Cite

Irfa Ma’alina Li’illiyyina, & Badrun Kartowagiran. (2019). Estimasi G-Study dalam Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tahsinul Qur’an. Edukasia Islamika, 4(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.28918/jei.v4i2.2296