Analisis Mantan Narapidana Korupsi Menjadi Calon Legislatif Berdasarkan Prinsip Musawa dan Keadilan
Keywords:
Ex-convicts, Legislative Candidates, Principles of Musawa and JusticeAbstract
This research delves into the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU- XVIII/2020, focusing on its impact on the inconsistency of Law Number 11 of 2020 and the resulting legal effects. Employing a juridical normative approach, the study examines legal concepts, principles, and regulations. The findings reveal that the Constitutional Court's conditional declaration of unconstitutionality for Law Number 11 of 2020 stems from discrepancies in its formation concerning clarity of purpose, formulation, and transparency, as stipulated by Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislation. The legal effects of Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on Law Number 11 of 2020 within Indonesia's legal system are significant. During the two-year rectification period, it retains legal status and is recorded in the Official Gazette. If no rectification occurs within two years, Law Number 11 of 2020 becomes permanently unconstitutional, and the prior laws it amended or replaced are reinstated. In conclusion, several recommendations are made: The Constitutional Court should issue clear, unambiguous verdicts for legal certainty. The public and academia should monitor government and legislative activities to uphold constitutional principles. This research sheds light on the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 and provides valuable guidance for Indonesia's legal and legislative stakeholders. The problem of political rights owned by former convicts arose after the enactment of PKPU No. 10 of 2023 and PKPU No. 11 of 2023 which determined that former convicts who would run for legislative candidates did not need to pass a five-year interval if they had received an additional sentence in the form of revocation of political rights. Whereas the Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XX/2022 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 12/PUU-XXI/2023 determine that ex-convicts must pass a five-year interval, without any additional conditions. This study aims to determine the regulation of the political rights of former corruption convicts in legislative elections and to review analyze the perspective of the principles of musawa and justice on the regulation of former corruption convicts to become legislative candidates. This research uses normative legal research methods. the data used in this research uses secondary data literature legal materials. The data collected in this study were collected through documentation techniques. Based on the results of the research, it can be stated that the regulation of the political rights of former prisoners to become legislative candidates has experienced the dynamics of regulatory changes through the Election Law, Constitutional Court Decisions, Supreme Court Decisions and KPU Regulations. Supreme Court Decision No. 28 P / HUM / 2023, Constitutional Court Decision No. 87 / PUU-XX / 2022 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 12 / PUU-XXI / 2023 are in accordance with the principle of musawa in general because they have equalized the political rights of ex-corruption convicts just like other citizens.
References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid 1. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. www.jimly.com/pemikiran/getbuku/4
Asshiddiqqie, J. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II. In Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Asshidiqie, J. (2005). Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi: Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media dan HAM. In Konstitusi Press. Konstitusi Press.
Diniyanto, A. (2016). Indonesian ’ s Pillars Democracy : How This Country Survives. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 1(1), 105–114.
Diniyanto, A. (2018a). Mengukur Dampak Penerapan Presidential Threshold di Pemilu Serentak Tahun 2019. Indonesian State Law Review, 1(1), 83–90.
Diniyanto, A. (2019a). Politik Hukum Regulasi Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia: Problem dan Tantangannya. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v16i2.464
Diniyanto, A. (2019b). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365.
Diniyanto, A. (2021a). Bertahan dan Menang Melawan Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Semangat Pancasila. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 9(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v9i4.412
Diniyanto, A. (2021b). Legal Protection Policy for Minority Groups (Evidence from Aboge Group in Purbalingga Indonesia). JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 6(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.49935
Diniyanto, A. (2021c). Omnibus Law dan Demokrasi Kita. Artikel RechtsVinding.
Diniyanto, A. (2021d). Peraturan Daerah Dana Cadangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 478–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i4.803
Diniyanto, A. (2021e). Perlindungan dan Penguatan Komunitas Minoritas: Kajian terhadap Eksistensi Komunitas Islam Aboge. Scientist Publishing.
Diniyanto, A. (2021f). UUD 1945 adalah Konstitusi Bernilai Normatif Bukan Nominal atau Semantik. RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.
Diniyanto, A. (2022a). Desain Pembentukan Peraturan Desa yang Demokratis dan Aspiratif. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i3.902
Diniyanto, A. (2022b). Mungkinkah Pemunduran Waktu Pemilu? Detik.Com.
Diniyanto, A. (2022c). Penundaan Pemilu dan Constitutional Deadlock. Artikel Hukum Rechtsvinding. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/?page=artikel&berita=558
Diniyanto, A. (2023a). Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Menunda Pemilu? Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/03/09/pengadilan-negeri-jakarta-pusat-menunda-pemilu
Diniyanto, A. (2023b). Relasi Politik PDIP dengan PKS dalam Demokrasi Lokal. JDPL (Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Politik Lokal), 5(2), 18–35.
Diniyanto, A. (2020). Peran KPK dalam Mendorong Pemerintah Daerah Melakukan Pencegahan Korupsi: Usulan Perubahan Model. Prosiding Pemberantasan Korupsi, 1–18. https://acch.kpk.go.id/images/Prosiding/1_Ayon_Diniyanto_edit_Peran_KPK_dalam_Mendorong_Pemerintah_Daerah.pdf
Diniyanto, A. (2018b). Tindak Pidana Pemilu dalam Perspektif Negara Demokrasi Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 4(2), 422–429.
Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
Diniyanto, A., & Kamalludin, I. (2021). Menyelamatkan Korban dari Jerat UU ITE: Studi Kasus Baiq Nuril Maknun dan Relevansinya Bagi Penguatan Peran Pemerintah Melindungi Pelapor Tindak Asusila. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 10(1), 1–18.
Diniyanto, A., & Muhtada, D. (2022). The Dynamics and Future of Qanun in the Welfare of the People of Aceh. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.31-42
Diniyanto, A., Muhtada, D., & Sofanudin, A. (2021). Kinship Politics in the 2020 Pilkada in Central Java: The Actors Involved and Their Influences. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.1-14
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022a). Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum di Era Post-Truth: Problem, Tantangan, dan Strategi. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.79
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022b). The Existence of Pancasila in Post-Truth Era. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 02(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v2i1.92
Fauzan, A., Diniyanto, A., & Hamid, A. (2022). Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317
Fuadi, M. Z. R. H., & Diniyanto, A. (2022). Written Quotations and Its Legal Protection: How Indonesian Law Reform on Copyrights Law? Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i1.53630
Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (Issue March). Penerbit Pustaka Ilmu.
Luluardi, Y. D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Political Dynasty in Law and Political Perspective: To What Extent has The Election Law been Reformed. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.44321
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2017). Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah: Tantangan dan Strategi Di Era Otonomi Daerah. Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara (KNHTN) Ke - 4 “Penataan Regulasi Di Indonesia.”
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Negara. BPFH Unnes.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Penguatan Peran BPIP dan Strategi Membumikan Pancasila untuk Melindungi Kelompok Minoritas. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 01(01), 111–121.
