From Digital Collectibles to Zakatable Income: A Sharia and Regulatory Analysis of NFT Creator Earnings in Indonesia

Muhammad Abdul Aziz; Syafiq Mahmadah Hanafi; Muhammad Luqman Ammar; Luthfi Muhyiddin

doi:10.28918/hckwb074

Authors

Muhammad Abdul Aziz University of Darussalam Gontor
Syafiq Mahmadah Hanafi Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
Muhammad Luqman Ammar University of Darussalam Gontor
Luthfi Muhyiddin Leipzig University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/hckwb074

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the zakat status of non-fungible token (NFT) creator earnings in Indonesia and to formulate an appropriate payment mechanism from the perspective of Islamic finance and national regulation. The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach based on library research and semi-structured interviews, involving key informants from the National Zakat Agency (BAZNAS) and the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, supported by zakat jurisprudence, regulatory documents, and relevant NFT literature. The findings show that the object of zakat does not lie in the NFT as a digital token itself, but in the income realized from sales and royalties. Such income is more appropriately classified as income or professional zakat, with a nisab equivalent to 85 grams of gold and a 2.5% rate after fulfilling the requirements of haul and lawful ownership. The study also finds that, in the Indonesian context, zakat on NFT creator earnings cannot yet be paid in cryptocurrency due to both regulatory and Sharia considerations; therefore, such earnings must first be converted into lawful local currency. This study recommends the development of clearer zakat guidelines for digital assets, broader empirical research on NFT creators, and a more adaptive regulatory framework in response to the expansion of the digital economy.

Keywords:

NFT, Income Zakat, Digital Assets

References

Abadi, K., Ahmad Taufiq, & Rizka Roikhana. (2023). Cryptocurrency and Crypto Assets in the Perspective of Islamic Legal System Philosophy. Hikmatuna : Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, 9(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.28918/hikmatuna.v9i2.1216

Adeoye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441

Bamakan, S. M. H., Nezhadsistani, N., Bodaghi, O., & Qu, Q. (2022). Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens: Key technologies and challenges. Scientific Reports, 12, 2178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05920-6

Belk, R., Humayun, M., & Brouard, M. (2022). Money, possessions, and ownership in the Metaverse: NFTs, cryptocurrencies, Web3 and wild markets. Journal of Business Research, 153, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.031

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Colicev, A. (2023). How can non-fungible tokens bring value to brands. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.07.003

Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171

Falk, B. H., Gu, B., Tsoukalas, G., & Zhang, N. (2022). Economics of NFTs: The value of creator royalties. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4284776

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kasri, R. A., & Yuniar, A. M. (2021). Determinants of digital zakat payments: Lessons from Indonesian experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0258

Khan, S. N. (2022). The legality of cryptocurrency from an Islamic perspective: A research note. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2022-0041

Muneeza, A., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdel Moshin, M. I., Mohamed, I., & Al-Saadi, A. (2022). Zakat payment from cryptocurrencies and crypto assets. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2021-0487

Murray, M. D. (2023). Transfers and licensing of copyrights to NFT purchasers. Stanford Journal of Blockchain Law & Policy, 6(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4152475

Nadini, M., Alessandretti, L., Di Giacinto, F., Martino, M., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2021). Mapping the NFT revolution: Market trends, trade networks, and visual features. Scientific Reports, 11, 20902. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00053-8

Pathak, V., Jena, B., & Kalra, S. (2013). Qualitative research. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 4(3), 192–192. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.115389

Rejeb, D. (2020). Blockchain and Smart Contract’s Contributions to Zakat Management System. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2020.207

Rosele, M. I., Muneem, A., Ali, A. K., Che Seman, A., Haji Abdullah, L., Abdul Rahman, N. N., & Sukor, M. E. A. (2025). A proposed zakat model for digital assets from the Shariah perspective. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(3), 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2024-0408

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%253C334::AID-NUR9%253E3.0.CO;2-G

Taherdoost, H. (2023). Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT): A systematic review. Information, 14(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010026

Tunç, M. M., Cavusoglu, H., & Zheng, Z. E. (2025). Resale royalty in non-fungible token marketplaces: Blessing or burden for creators and platforms? Information Systems Research, 36(3), 1543–1564. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0035

Vega, E., & Camarero, C. (2024). What’s behind the jpg? Understanding consumer adoption of non-fungible tokens. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), e13014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13014

Widiastuti, T., Cahyono, E. F., Zulaikha, S., Mawardi, I., & Al Mustofa, M. U. (2021). Optimizing zakat governance in East Java using analytical network process (ANP): The role of zakat technology (ZakaTech). Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0307

Wiwoho, J., Trinugroho, I., Kharisma, D. B., & Suwadi, P. (2024). Islamic crypto assets and regulatory framework: Evidence from Indonesia and global approaches. International Journal of Law and Management, 66(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2023-0051

Yilmaz, T., Sagfossen, S., & Velasco, C. (2023). What makes NFTs valuable to consumers? Perceived value drivers associated with NFTs liking, purchasing, and holding. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114056