Studi Perbandingan Kurikulum Finlandia dan Indonesia: Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/circle.v5i1.9812Abstract
Problem-solving ability is one of the abilities developed in the mathematics curriculum in various countries. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the proportion of support for improving problem-solving abilities in high school mathematics curriculum documents in Finland and Indonesia, (2) determine the comparison of support in improving problem-solving abilities in high school mathematics curriculum documents in Finland and Indonesia. The method of this study is Study Literature Review (SLR). The data collection technique is documentation. The data analysis technique used is meta-synthesis with a meta-aggregation approach. The results of the study obtained (1) the proportion of problem-solving abilities in the components of the high school mathematics curriculum in both Finland and Indonesia was 44%. (2) the similarities between the Finnish and Indonesian curricula at the high school level to improve mathematical problem-solving abilities are in the aspect of mathematics learning, there are transversal components, there are general objectives and study objectives/learning achievements, the availability of modules and assessments, while the differences between the Finnish and Indonesian curricula at the high school level to improve mathematical problem-solving abilities are in the components of mathematical objectives and evaluation. In Indonesia, problem solving is one of the focuses of general mathematics objectives. Although in Finland the general objectives of mathematics do not include problem solving, they appear in each study objective. In the Finnish curriculum, the focus of evaluation includes problem solving and the obligation to use technology in evaluation, while in the Indonesian curriculum, evaluation is focused on initial, process, and final learning assessments.
Keywords:
References
Agustyaningrum, N., & Himmi, N. (2022). Best Practices Sistem Pendidikan di Finlandia sebagai Refleksi Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 2100–2109. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2234
Andri, R. M. (2017). Peran dan Fungsi Teknologi Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Sains, 3(1), 122–129. http://www.jurnalmudiraindure.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/PERAN-DAN-FUNGSI-TEKNOLOGI-DALAM-PENINGKATAN-KUALITAS-PEMBELAJARAN.pdf
Asfiana, Fitriyani, & Rokhimawan, M. A. (2025). Analisis Tantangan dan Kelebihan Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi pada Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. Ideguru : Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(1), 187–193.
Braskén, M., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Implementing a Multidisciplinary Curriculum in a Finnish Lower Secondary School – The Perspective of Science and Mathematics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 852–868.
BSKAP. (2024). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 032/H/KR/2024 tentang Capaian Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan ME.
Dafik, Agustin, I. H., Alfarisi, R., & Kurniawati, E. Y. (2020). Integrating A Graph Theory In A School Math Curriculum Of Indonesia Under Realistic Mathematics Education. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1), 2437–2445.
Dorimana, A., Uworwabayeho, A., & Nizeyimana, G. (2022). Enhancing Upper Secondary Learners’ Problem-solving Abilities using Problem-based Learning in Mathematics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.14
Education, F. N. A. F. (2019). National Core Curriculum For General Upper Secondary Education 2019.
Federick, A. (2020). Finland Education System. International Journal of Science and Society, 2(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v2i2.88
Fujiawati, F. S. (2016). Pemahaman konsep kurikulum dan pembelajaran dengan peta konsep bagi mahasiswa pendidikan seni. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kajian Seni, 1(1), 16–28.
García, T., Boom, J., Kroesbergen, E. H., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Planning, execution, and revision in mathematics problem solving: Does the order of the phases matter? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61(February), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.03.001
Hermawan, Y. C., Juliani, W. I., & Widodo, H. (2020). Konsep Kurikulum dan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal MUDARRISUNA, 10(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.53649/taujih.v3i1.88
Lestari, R. E., Shalihudin, A. F., & Khojir. (2023). Perbandingan Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia dan Finlandia. Borneo Journal of Islamic Education, 3(2), 129–141.
Maritsa, A., Salsabila, U. H., Wafiq, M., Anindya, P. R., & Azhar Ma’shum, M. (2021). Pengaruh Teknologi Dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Al-
Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan, 18(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v18i2.303
Masduki, Kholid, M. N., & Khotimah, R. P. (2020). Exploring Students’ Problem-solving Ability and Response towards Metacognitive Strategy in Mathematics Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3698–3703. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080849
Muchyidin, A., Priatna, N., Dahlan, J. A., Marfuah, M., Pahmi, S., Aisyah, A., Zulkarnain, Z., Rohati, R., & Kusmanto, H. (2022). Mathematics curriculum for intellectual disabilities schools in Indonesia and abroad: Literature review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2633(September), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102268
Nirwana, R., Hidayati, A. I., Ifcha, F. A., Azzahra, S. F., Sayyidah, A., & Jannah, R. (2024). Penilaian Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka: Mendukung Pembelajaran Adaptif Dan Berpusat Pada Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (JMI), 02(2), 213.
Nisrokha. (2018). Authentic Assessment (Penilaian Otentik). Jurnal Madaniyah, 8(2), 209–229.
Nuha, M. A. (2016). Integrasi Teknologi Dalam Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa. Seminar Nasional Matematika X Universitas Negeri Semarang, 146–150.
Palsa, L., & Mertala, P. (2022). Disciplinary contextualisation of transversal competence in Finnish local curricula: the case of multiliteracy, mathematics, and social studies. Education Inquiry, 13(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1855827
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it mathematical method (2nd ed.). Doubleday Company.
Prasetyo, A. R., & Hamami, T. (2020). Prinsip-prinsip dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum. Palapa, 8(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v8i1.692
Putra, I. E. D., Rusdinal, R., Ananda, A., & Gistituati, N. (2023). Perbandingan Kurikulum Pendidikan Indonesia dan Finlandia. Journal on Education, 06(01), 7437–7448. https://journal.uinsi.ac.id/index.php/bjie/article/download/7346/2511/
Risfina, A. M., Haqi, A., & Oviyanti, F. (2023). Keberhasilan Program Belajar Sepanjang Hayat di Finlandia dalam Perspektif Islam. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 4(2), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v4i2.232
Sakti, B. P. (2022). Types of Authentic learning Assessment. Attadib: Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 342–350.
Setiyadi, B., Rohima, R., Sari, Y., & Yani, M. A. (2020). Komponen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Likhitaprajna, 22(1), 13–21. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/500373-none-d494ab81.pdf
Siregar, N. F., Junaidi, I., & Mulyono. (2024). Kurikulum Pendidikan Matematika Pada Tingkat Sekolah Menengah (Secondary School) Di Indonesia Dan Singapura. Koordinat Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Dan Sains, 5(2), 95–101.
Susanto, A., Setyaningrum, W., Camellia, F., & Asriani, N. W. (2023). Tren Pemanfaatan Teknologi Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(3), 3088. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i3.7545
Suyuti, S., Wahyuningrum, P. E., Jamil, M. A., Nawawi, M. L., Aditia, D., & Rusmayani, N. G. A. L. (2023). Analisis Efektivitas Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Pendidikan Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.2908
Urfah, N., Adelia, W., & Syamsiyah, N. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Evaluasi Pendidikan Pada Kurikulum 2013 Dan Pendidikan Di Finlandia. Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(02), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.47007/edu.v7i02.5540
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Destia Wahyu Hidayati, Iwan Junaedi, Mulyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
