Ratio Decidendi Penolakan Permohonan Pengujian Norma Undang-Undang pada Putusan Nomor 47/PUU-XXI/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v4i01.9545Abstract
This research aims to explore the ratio decidendi in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 47/PUU-XXI/2023 and analyze the application of constitutional values contained in the decision. This research uses a normative method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. This approach aims to understand the legal basis on which the Constitutional Court's decision is based and its implications for the protection of constitutional rights. The results showed that the Constitutional Court rejected the petition for norm testing in Article 509 letter a of the latest Criminal Code. The rejection was based on the provision that the new Criminal Code will be enacted after three years since its enactment, so the petition was considered premature. In its decision, the Court emphasized the importance of the principle of legal certainty and the protection of advocates' rights from unconstitutional criminal threats. However, the petition could not be accepted due to the lack of concrete harm experienced by the petitioner. This finding underscores that the Constitutional Court continues to prioritize basic constitutional principles in its decision-making, even though the petition did not proceed to material examination. Thus, this research makes an important contribution in understanding how constitutional values are applied in the Constitutional Court's decisions, particularly in relation to the review of criminal law norms. The implications of this research are expected to be a reference in the development of the study of constitutional law and the protection of human rights in Indonesia.
Keywords:
References
Aziz, A. S. (2018). REKONSEPTUALISASI TAFSIR ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH. IQTISAD, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v4i1.1998
Costantini, C. (2015). Common Law System. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, (September), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_592-1
Crema, M., & Solum, L. B. (2022). THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF “DUE PROCESS OF LAW” IN THE FIFTH AMENDMENT. Virginia Law Review, 108(2).
Fadilah, U., Hendrawati, S., & Saepudin, E. A. (2024). PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 90 / PUU-XXI / 2023 SYARAT CALON WAKIL PRESIDEN PADA PEMILU 2024, 4, 501–510.
Hantoro, N. M. (2020). Periode Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi dan Implikasinya terhadap Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Term of Office for Constitutional Justices and Its Implications against Judicial Independence). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v11i2.1705
Hapsoro, F. L., & Ismail, I. (2020). Interpretasi Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas untuk Mewujudkan The Living Constitution. Jambura Law Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v2i2.5644
Haryono, D. (2022). Metode Tafsir Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Konstitusional Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Konstitusi. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1843
Inayati, A. A., & Pratama, A. B. (2022). Epistemology in Islam: The Integration of Science and Religion According to Kuntowijoyo and Its Correlation with the National Law Establishment. Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v6i1.7280
Jufri, M., Aidonojie, P. A., Fahmi, A. A., Asyiqoh, L., & Ikubanni, O. O. (2024). Standardisation of the Legislation as a Follow-Up to the Constitutional Court’s Decision on Judicial Review of Omnibus Law. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(3), 366–391. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2132
Junaedi. (2018). Pancasila Sebagai Sistem Filsafat Dalam Penerapan Konsep Negara Hukum Indonesia. Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 3(12).
Maggalatung, A. S. (2014). Hubungan Antara Fakta Norma, Moral, dan Doktrin Hukum Dalam Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim. JURNAL CITA HUKUM, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.1462
Martitah, M. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature? Jakarta: Penerbit Konstitusi Press (Konpress).
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (16th ed.). Surabaya: Kencana.
Muda, I. (2020). Perkembangan Kewenangan Konstitusional Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Pratama, A. B. (2021). Mengukur Imunitas Pejabat Pelaksana Perppu 1/2020 Dengan Asas Equality Before The Law. Supremasi Hukum, 17, 1–11.
Pratama, A. B., . A., & Jamin, M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Ideal Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/Puu-Xi/2013. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i2.18258
Pratama, A. B., & Aziz, A. (2024). Rational Restrictions Or Pruning Of Rights ? Deadline For Submitting Formal Tests At The Constitutional Court. Jurnal Tapis : Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 20(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.24042
Pratama, A. B., Manasikana, A., & Fadzlina, N. A. (2023). Efektivitas Layanan Aduan Lapor Bupati Berbasis E-Government di Kabupaten Pekalongan. Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis, 4(1), 78–96. Retrieved from https://stia-saidperintah.e-journal.id/ppj/article/view/120%0Ahttps://stia-saidperintah.e-journal.id/ppj/article/download/120/81
Pratama, A. B., & Yusron, M. (2024). Advokasi Hak Pilih Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Di Kabupaten Batang. AKM Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.36908
Risnain, M. (2018). Eksistensi Lembaga Quasi Judisial Dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan.
Sari, A. F. P., & Raharjo, P. S. (2022). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Negative Legislator Dan Positive Legislator. Souvereignty, 1(4), 681–691. Retrieved from https://journal.uns.ac.id/Souvereignty/article/view/112
Sugiono Margi, & Maulida Khazanah. (2022). Kedudukan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Kelembagaan Negara. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v1i3.48
