Perbandingan Rekrutmen Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dengan Jerman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v4i02.9260Abstract
The Constitutional Court in a country has a very important role for the implementation of the constitution in a country, so the recruitment process is ensured to be carried out transparently, participatively, objectively and accountably. The principles of the constitutional judge recruitment mechanism have not been implemented properly, because the law does not clearly regulate the parameters of the selection mechanism. Talking about the recruitment process for Constitutional Court judges. Germany which is considered an independent country in carrying out the recruitment process for constitutional judges. This study aims to explain the comparison and legal consequences of the recruitment process for Constitutional Court judges in Indonesia and Germany. In Indonesia, the nomination process for Constitutional Court judges is carried out by President, the House of Representatives (DPR), and the Supreme Court (MA). While in Germany it is proposed by the Bundestag and Bundesrat. Each proposing institution creates a mechanism for selecting Constitutional Court judges and integrates it with a reliable and professional merit system. Germany in an effort to accelerate and increase the efficiency of the recruitment process for Constitutional Court judges can consider several things, including determining the consensus deadline.
Keywords:
References
Alsyam. (2023). Pengisian Jabatan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Berdasarkan Kajian terhadap Kredibilitas dan Independensi Hakim. Riau Law Journal, 7(1), 70–82. Retrieved from https://rlj.ejournal.unri.ac.id
Davis, R., & Williams, G. (2003). Reform of the Judicial Appointments Process: Gender and the Bench of the High Court of Australia. Melbourne Law Review, 27. Retrieved from http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/2003/32.html
Diniyanto, A. (n.d.). Bahan Ajar Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstutusi: Sejarah Peradilan Konstitusi.
Diniyanto, A. (2016). Indonesian ’ s Pillars Democracy : How This Country Survives. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 1(1), 105–114.
Diniyanto, A. (2019). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365.
Diniyanto, A. (2021a). Omnibus Law dan Demokrasi Kita.
Diniyanto, A. (2021b). UUD 1945 adalah Konstitusi Bernilai Normatif Bukan Nominal atau Semantik.
Diniyanto, A. (2022). Penundaan Pemilihan Umum di Negara Hukum: Kajian Demokrasi Konstitusional. Negara Hukum, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v13i2.3365
Diniyanto, A. (2023a). Inkonsistensi Pengaturan Komisi Yudisial. Retrieved from Kabar Buana website: https://www.kabarbuana.com/kolom/9068270236/inkonsistensi-pengaturan-komisi-yudisial
Diniyanto, A. (2023b). Mahkamah Konstitusi Mesti Dibatasi? Retrieved from Rechtsvnding website: https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/?page=artikel&berita=847
Diniyanto, A. (2023c). MK Berhenti “Positive Legislature.” Retrieved from Kompas.com website: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/06/14/14282541/mk-berhenti-positive-legislature?page=all
Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
Diniyanto, A., & Muhtada, D. (2022). The Dynamics and Future of Qanun in the Welfare of the People of Aceh. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.31-42
Diniyanto, A., & Suhendar, H. (2020). How Law Responds to Technological Development? Unnes Law Journal, 6(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41297
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022). Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum di Era Post-Truth: Problem, Tantangan, dan Strategi. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.79
Fauzan, A., Diniyanto, A., & Hamid, A. (2022). Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317
Hailbronner, M. (2014). Rethinking the rise of the German Constitutional Court: From anti-Nazism to value formalism. I•CON, 12(3), 626–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou047
Hasibuan, R. (2020). Penerapan Asas Independensi Dalam Rekrutmen Hakim Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Hutchinson, T., & James, N. (2012). Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research. Deakin Law Review, 17(83), 98–101.
Khasna, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). State Authority in Appointing ASN: Comparison of Issues between KPK Employees and Honorary Teachers. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46347
Law), T. V. C. (European C. for D. T. (2008). Draft Vadenmecum on the Judiciary. CDLJD, (2008)001. Retrieved from www.venice.coe.int
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2017). Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah: Tantangan dan Strategi Di Era Otonomi Daerah. Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara (KNHTN) Ke - 4 “Penataan Regulasi Di Indonesia.” Jember: UPT Penerbitan Universitas Jember.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Negara. Semarang: BPFH Unnes.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021a). Penataan Regulasi di Indonesia Melalui Lembaga Independen. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 16(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.31866
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021b). Penguatan Peran BPIP dan Strategi Membumikan Pancasila untuk Melindungi Kelompok Minoritas. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 01(01), 111–121.
Prasetyo, H., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Law Enforcement in the Aspects of Natural Resources and Environmental. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(1), 43–52.
Ramadani, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2023). Perbandingan Judicial Review di Negara Indonesia dengan Uruguay. Journal of Constitutional Law., 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/01
Said, K., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Determination of Advancement of Technology Against Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 125–134.
Streinz, R. (2014). The Role of the German Federal Constitutional Court Law and Politics. Retrieved from https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr31/09streinz.pdf
