Inkonsistensi Norma Konstitusional Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020
Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Inconsistencies; Law., LawAbstract
This research delves into the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU- XVIII/2020, focusing on its impact on the inconsistency of Law Number 11 of 2020 and the resulting legal effects. Employing a juridical normative approach, the study examines legal concepts, principles, and regulations. The findings reveal that the Constitutional Court's conditional declaration of unconstitutionality for Law Number 11 of 2020 stems from discrepancies in its formation concerning clarity of purpose, formulation, and transparency, as stipulated by Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislation. The legal effects of Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on Law Number 11 of 2020 within Indonesia's legal system are significant. During the two-year rectification period, it retains legal status and is recorded in the Official Gazette. If no rectification occurs within two years, Law Number 11 of 2020 becomes permanently unconstitutional, and the prior laws it amended or replaced are reinstated. In conclusion, several recommendations are made: The Constitutional Court should issue clear, unambiguous verdicts for legal certainty. The public and academia should monitor government and legislative activities to uphold constitutional principles. This research sheds light on the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 and provides valuable guidance for Indonesia's legal and legislative stakeholders.
References
Bintari, A. E. (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Negative Legislator dalam Penegakan Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Pandecta, 1(8).
Diniyanto, A. (2019). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal RechtsVinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365.
Diniyanto, A. (2021). Peraturan Daerah Dana Cadangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(4), 478–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i4.803
Diniyanto, A. (2022a). Desain Pembentukan Peraturan Desa yang Demokratis dan Aspiratif. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v19i3.902
Diniyanto, A. (2022b). Penundaan Pemilihan Umum di Negara Hukum: Kajian Demokrasi Konstitusional. Negara Hukum, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v13i2.3365
Diniyanto, A. (2023a). Apakah Bisa Menambah Kewenangan MPR. Kabar Buana. ttps://www.kabarbuana.com/kolom/9068964748/apakah-bisa-menambah-kewenangan-mpr
Diniyanto, A. (2023b). MK Berhenti “Positive Legislature.” Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/06/14/14282541/mk-berhenti-positive-legislature?page=all
Diniyanto, A. (2020). Peran KPK dalam Mendorong Pemerintah Daerah Melakukan Pencegahan Korupsi: Usulan Perubahan Model. Prosiding Pemberantasan Korupsi, 1–18. https://acch.kpk.go.id/images/Prosiding/1_Ayon_Diniyanto_edit_Peran_KPK_dalam_Mendorong_Pemerintah_Daerah.pdf
Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
Diniyanto, A., & Muhtada, D. (2022). The Dynamics and Future of Qanun in the Welfare of the People of Aceh. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.1.31-42
Diniyanto, A., Muhtada, D., & Sofanudin, A. (2021). Kinship Politics in the 2020 Pilkada in Central Java: The Actors Involved and Their Influences. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.1.1.1-14
Diniyanto, A., & Suhendar, H. (2020). How Law Responds to Technological Development? Unnes Law Journal, 6(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41297
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022). Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum di Era Post-Truth: Problem, Tantangan, dan Strategi. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.79
Fauzan, A., Diniyanto, A., & Hamid, A. (2022). Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317
Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif (Issue March). Penerbit Pustaka Ilmu.
Khasna, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). State Authority in Appointing ASN: Comparison of Issues between KPK Employees and Honorary Teachers. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46347
Martitah. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature? Konstitusi Press (KONpress).
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2016). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. In Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987) (3rd ed., Vol. 30, Issue 25, p. 33). https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.25.33.s40
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Penataan Regulasi di Indonesia Melalui Lembaga Independen. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 16(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.31866
Said, K., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Determination of Advancement of Technology Against Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 125–134.
