<i>Ratio Decidendi</i> Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Pengangkatan Advokat Berstatus Dosen PNS Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/g1ggbs33Abstract
This research analyze the ratio decidendi of Decision Number 150/PUU-XXII/2024 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The focus of this study includes the ratio decidendi, legal consequences, social benefits, and the review of maṣlaḥah mursalah in the Constitutional Court’s decision. This research is categorized as normative juridical research, employing both a statutute approach and a maṣlaḥah mursalah approach. The analysis of legal data or materials obtained by the author was conducted through several stages, namely inventory, identification, classification, and systematization. The collected data were then classified and examined using the statutory approach and the maṣlaḥah mursalah approach. The analysis indicate that Decision Number 150/PUU-XXII/2024, which authorizes civil servant lecturers to practice as advocates by providing prodeo or pro bono legal aid, prioritizes considerations of justice and legal utility. The Constitutional Court referred to Decision Number 006/PUU-II/2004, which explains that the right to legal aid as a human right constitutes an individual constitutional right that must be fulfilled, even though it is not explicitly stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Furthermore, the distribution of advocates in Indonesia remains uneven and disproportionate to the country’s territorial scope and the legal needs of society. Based on the perspective of maṣlaḥah mursalah, the Constitutional Court’s decision can be classified as a form of maslaḥah ḥajiyyat, which purposes to alleviate societal difficulties in accessing justice and obtaining legal assistance through advocates.
Keywords:
References
Aminudin, Panjaitan, B. S., & Lubis, F. (2024). Perdebatan Para Mujtahid Tentang Teori Mashlahah Mursalah. Rechtsnormen Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum, 2(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.56211/rechtsnormen.v2i2.477
Arifin, B. (2024). Kehujjahan Maslahah Mursalah Dalam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Najm Al-Din Al-Tufi. Al-Mawaddah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Hukum Keluarga, 1(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.61181/al-mawaddah.v1i1.426
At-Tabarani. (1411). Al-Mu’jam Al-Shagir. Dar Ihya’al-Turath Al-’Arabi.
Atika, R., & Diniyanto, A. (2025). Kekosongan Hukum Mekanisme Pencabutan Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 05(02), 187–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v5i02.13936
Azzahra, S. S., & Pratama, A. B. (2025). Penafsiran Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Kewenangan Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 05(02), 209–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v5i02.13931
Budiarti, A. I. (2023). Indeks Akses Terhadap Keadilan Di Indonesia Tahun 2021. UI Publishing.
Carnawi, C., Hanif, S. F., & Diniyanto, A. (2022). Policy for movement of state capital in Indonesia based on smart city: Ecological and social welfare impact analysis. JALS SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: Technological Advancement for Social Welfare: Contemporary Development and the Future Impact.
Collins, J. S. (2021). Kebijakan Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Demokrasi (Analisis Berdasarkan Konsep Pemenuhan Hak dan Partisipasi Masyarakat) (1st ed.). Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia (MaPPI FH UI).
Diniyanto, A. (2016). Indonesian’s Pillars Democracy: How This Country Survives. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 1(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v1i01.16572
Diniyanto, A. (2018). Tindak Pidana Pemilu dalam Perspektif Negara Demokrasi Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 4(2), 422–429.
Diniyanto, A. (2019). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.331
Diniyanto, A. (2021a). Omnibus Law dan Demokrasi Kita. Artikel RechtsVinding.
Diniyanto, A. (2021b). UU ITE, Amnesti, dan Negara Hukum. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/ayondiniyanto24/uu-ite-amnesti-dan-negara-hukum-1wfeBYoMZFL
Diniyanto, A. (2022). Penundaan Pemilihan Umum di Negara Hukum: Kajian Demokrasi Konstitusional. Negara Hukum, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v13i2.3365
Diniyanto, A. (2024). Pemakzulan Presiden di Negara Hukum. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 15(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i1.4363
Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
Diniyanto, A., & Suhendar, H. (2020). How Law Responds to Technological How Law Responds to Technological Development? Unnes Law Journal, 6(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.41297
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022). Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum di Era Post-Truth: Problem, Tantangan, dan Strategi. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.79
Efendi, J. (2018). Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum Dan Rasa Keadilan Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat. Prenadamedia Group.
Fakhar, S. J. (2025). Quo Vadis Putusan MK Dosen PNS Bisa Jadi Advokat.
Fauzan, A., Diniyanto, A., & Hamid, A. (2022). Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317
Hamid, A., Diniyanto, A., & Holish, A. M. (2023). Reconstructing the Concept of Halal Product Guarantee in Realizing Justice and Benefit. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, Dan Tradisi), 9(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v9i2.1996
Inayati, A. A., Faristiana, A. R., & Pratama, A. B. (2025). Digital Pathways to Inclusive Development: Islamic Economic Perspectives on Structural and Epistemic Justice in Indonesia. 7th Open Society Conference (OSC).
Iqbal, M. (2014). Fiqh Siyasah: Kontekstualisasi Doktrin Politik Islam. Prenadamedia Group.
Isthifailla, & Pratama, A. B. (2024). Hakim Konstitusi di Persimpangan Jalan: Kuasa Lembaga Pengusul dalam Pemberhentian yang Kontroversial. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 04(202), 155–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v4i02.9256
Khozin, A. N., & Diniyanto, A. (2025). Politik Hukum Perubahan Regulasi Masa Jabatan Kepala Desa. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 05(01), 31–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v5i01.12548
Manullang, E. F. M. (2022). Misinterpretasi Ide Gustav Radbruch mengenai Doktrin Filosofis tentang Validitas dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.453-480
Margono. (2021). Asas Keadilan, Kemanfaatan Dan Kepastian Hukum Dan Putusan Hakim. Sinar Grafika.
Marlina, A. (2024). Akses Keadilan Yang Tidak Sampai: Studi Kajian Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Miskin. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 541. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.8668
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Graha Ekspress.
Miswanto, A. (2019a). Ushul Fiqh: Metode Ijtihad Hukum Islam. In Magnum Pustaka Utama, Yogyakarta; Unimma Press … (2nd ed.). Magnum Pustaka Utama.
Miswanto, A. (2019b). Ushul Fiqh: Metode Ijtihad Hukum Islam. Magnum Pustaka Utama.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Negara. BPFH Unnes.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Penataan Regulasi di Indonesia Melalui Lembaga Independen. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 16(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.31866
Mukarromah, I., & Diniyanto, A. (2023). Perbedaan Penafsiran Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi oleh Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 03(02), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v3i02.1414
Nafisah, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2024). Independensi Lembaga Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 04(01), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v4i01.8664
Nurhidayati, M., & Lubis, F. (2023). Implementasi Bantuan Hukum Prodeo dan Pro Bono dalam Penegaran Hukum Indonesia. As-Syar’i, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.47476/assyari.v5i3.2791
Pambudi, M. S., & Anwary, I. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Status Dosen PNS Yang Boleh Menjadi Advokat Dalam Purusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 150 / PUU-XXII / 2024 Legal Certainty of the Status of Civil Servant Lecturers Who Can Become Advocates in Constitutional Court Decision Number 150 / PUU-X. 8(6), 3678. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i6.7889
Polii, D. J., Polii, V., Pembangunan, U., Manado, I., Manado, K., Pembangunan, U., Manado, I., Manado, K., Info, A., Groups, V., Aid, L., Barries, J., & Reform, L. P. (2025). Akses Keadilan bagi Kelompok Rentan: Studi Empiris Mengenai Hambatan Struktural dalam Sistem Peradilan. 3(1). https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2330
Pratama, A. B. (2021). Mengukur Imunitas Pejabat Pelaksana Perppu 1/2020 dengan Asas Equality Before the Law. Supremasi Hukum, 17(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v17i2.1406
Pratama, A. B. (2024). Ratio of Legis Dissolution of Community Organizations Without Due Process Of Law. Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 33(2 SE-Articles), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.33.2.92-109
Pratama, A. B., & Aziz, A. (2024). Rational Restrictions Or Pruning Of Rights ? Deadline For Submitting Formal Tests At The Constitutional Court. Jurnal Tapis : Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 20(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.24042
Pratama, A. B., Firdaus, A. M., Inayati, A. A., & Nasrulhaq, N. (2026). Mining Concession Policy for Religious Organizations in Indonesia: An Analysis of Vertical Inconsistencies in the Norm Hierarchy Framework. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 14(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v14i1.4366
Pratama, A. B., Imaduddin, A., & Asyria, T. (2025). Legal Analysis Of The Appointment Of Acting Officials To Fill Vacancies In Democratic Regional Leadership Positions. Jurnal Tapis : Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 21(1), 117–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v21i1.26235
Pratama, A. B., Imaduddin, A., Firdausi, M., Nasrulhaq, N., & Sakr, F. M. M. M. S. (2025). Fast Track Legislation And The Erosion of Meaningful Participation: A Legal Political Critique of The State Ministries Law And Its Implications For Constitutional Democracy. Ijtihad.
Pratama, A. B., & Sekar, A. (2024). The Conflict of Legal Norms: Islamic Law and Positive Law in the Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages in Pekalongan City. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 12(2 SE-Articles), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v12i2.3671
Purba, A. R. (2024). Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penegakan Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Darma Agung, 32(6), 348–354.
Putri, S. E., & Pratama, A. B. (2025). The Authority of Acting Regional Heads in Employee Mutation : Between Legality and Abuse of Power Manabia : Journal of Consitutional Law. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 129–146.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 150/PUU-XXII/2024.
Rakha Elwansyah Giri Subagja, Bambang Heriyanto, & Herli Antoni. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 150/Puu-Xxii/2024 Terkait Uji Materiil Pasal 3 Ayat (1) Huruf C Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat. Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 3(3), 1093. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v3i3.1869
Ramadani, S., & Diniyanto, A. (2023). Perbandingan Judicial Review di Negara Indonesia dengan Uruguay. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law., 03(01), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/01
Rasji, & Erwin, Y. P. (2025). Implikasi Pemberian Bantuan Hukumoleh Dosen Pegawai Negeri Sipil sebagai Advokat Ditinjau dari Aspek Kemanfaatan Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 150/PUU-XXII/2024). Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.942
Rifa’I, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika.
Siregar, R. E., & Reza, T. S. (2025). Dari Dosen Ke Advokat: Telaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 150/PUU-XXII/2024 Dalam Perspektif Siyasah Qadhaiyyah. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.32505/politica.v12i2.12878
Sista, K., Pramita, P., Martana, D. M., Udayana, U., Klod, D. P., & Denpasar, K. (2025). Interdependensi dosen pegawai negeri sipil dalam menjawat profesi advokat guna kepentingan justiciabelen. 3(10).
Statistik, B. P. (2025). Tingkat Kemiskinan Kembali Menurun.
Sukeriyadi, M., Barni, M., & Iskandar. (2023). Hakikat Potensi Manusia Menurut Alquran dan Hadis. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS), 6(12), 1920–1931. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v6i12.4564
Syafithri, F. N. dan M. D. H. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Dosen Pegawai Negeri Sipil Merangkap Profesi Aebagai Advokat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 150/PUU-XXII/2024 (Legal Review of Civil Servant Lecturers Concurrenty Practicing as Advokates Following the Constitutional Court Decision . 4(18), 1464–1481.
Ulong, R. (2025). Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No . 150 / Puu-Xxii / 2024 Concerning Civil Servant ( PNS ) Lecturers Being Advocates from the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah. 14(3), 774–788.
Ulum, M., & Diniyanto, A. (2024). Perbandingan Rekrutmen Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia dengan Jerman. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 04(02), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v4i02.9260
Wibowo, S. E. (2016). Etika Profesi Kode Etik Advokat Di Indonesia. Narotama University Press.
Widiarty, W. (2024). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Publika Global Media.
