Kekosongan Hukum Mekanisme Pencabutan Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v5i02.13936Abstract
This study examines the mechanism for revoking the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly, focusing on the legal consequences of the revocation and formulating ways to address the resulting legal vacuum. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal impact of the revocation of the People's Consultative Assembly Decree and to formulate solutions to the legal vacuum in the revocation mechanism. The method used in this study is doctrinal (normative) with a literature study approach, analysis of laws and regulations, legal products, and doctrines in legal science. The results of the study indicate that the revocation of the People's Consultative Assembly Decree has legal consequences because the People's Consultative Assembly does not actually have the explicit authority to revoke the Decree based on the 1945 Constitution. This condition creates legal problems in the form of unclear procedures and legal basis for the revocation, thus creating a legal vacuum. Therefore, there is a need for special disclosure and handling to overcome this legal vacuum so that the process of revoking the People's Consultative Assembly Decree has a strong legal basis and clear procedures. This handling is very important considering that the 1945 Constitution does not yet provide explicit authority to the MPR to issue or revoke People's Consultative Assembly Decrees.
Keywords:
References
Agustian, T. (2016). Implikasi Pengujian Ketetapan MPR dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 75/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol1.iss1.art1
Arliman, L. (2016). Kedudukan Ketetapan MPR Dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Lex Jurnalica (Journal of Law), 13(3), 158–170.
Brian Wicaksono, D. (2018). Pengujian Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. 1(3), 177.
Deby Shintawulan, Meilita Rizkynanda, Nouva Ayu Ramadhanti, & Tries Ellia Sandari. (2024). Analisis Dampak Penyalahgunaan Wewenang terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 3(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.55606/jekombis.v3i4.4531
Diniyanto, A. (2016). Indonesian ’ s Pillars Democracy : How This Country Survives. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 1(1), 105–114.
Diniyanto, A. (2019). Reformasi Hukum Tanah Desa: Redefinisi dan Penguatan Kedudukan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i3.331
Diniyanto, A. (2020). Bureaucracy in Perspective of Government Administration Laws. Law Research Review Quarterly, 6(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i1.36706
Diniyanto, A. (2021). Bisakah Menguji AD/ART Parpol? DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5751700/bisakah-menguji-ad-art-parpol
Diniyanto, A. (2022). Penundaan Pemilihan Umum di Negara Hukum: Kajian Demokrasi Konstitusional. Negara Hukum, 13(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v13i2.3365
Diniyanto, A. (2023a). Apakah Bisa Menambah Kewenangan MPR. Kabar Buana. ttps://www.kabarbuana.com/kolom/9068964748/apakah-bisa-menambah-kewenangan-mpr
Diniyanto, A. (2023b). Kepala Desa, Pimpinan KPK, dan Putusan MK. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-7085645/kepala-desa-pimpinan-kpk-dan-putusan-mk
Diniyanto, A. (2024a). Mempertanyakan Mekanisme Pencabutan Tap MPR. DetikNews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-7568568/mempertanyakan-mekanisme-pencabutan-tap-mpr
Diniyanto, A. (2024b). Pemakzulan Presiden di Negara Hukum. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 15(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i1.4363
Diniyanto, A., Hartono, B. S., & Suhendar, H. (2021). Strategi dan Model Omnibus Law dalam Penataan Regulasi. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(2), 165–186. https://doi.org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i2.10162
Diniyanto, A., & Sutrisno, W. (2022). Pengawasan Pemilihan Umum di Era Post-Truth: Problem, Tantangan, dan Strategi. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v5i1.79
Dsalimunthe, D. (2017). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW). Al-Maqasid, 3(1), 16.
Fauzan, A., Diniyanto, A., & Hamid, A. (2022). Regulation Arrangement through The Judicial Power: The Challenges of Adding the Authority of The Constitutional Court and The Supreme Court. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(3), 403–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i3.58317
Hasibuan, A. M. (2022). Kekosongan Hukum Pengujian Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat. Jurnal Yudisial, 15(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v15i1.439
Inayati, A. A., & Pratama, A. B. (2022). Epistemology in Islam: The Integration of Science and Religion According to Kuntowijoyo and Its Correlation with the National Law Establishment. Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v6i1.7280
Inayati, A. A., & Pratama, A. B. (2025). Ba ’ i Al - Wafa ’ Dan Buyback Emas : Analisis Ekonomi Islam dan Budaya Hukum dalam Praktik Transaksi Masyarakat Muslim. AKSES: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 20(2), 24–34.
Inayati, A. A., Risqiani, R., & Pratama, A. B. (2022). ANALISIS HUKUM ISLAM TERHADAP PRAKTIK JUAL BELI DENGAN SISTEM TUKAR VOUCER. Jisyaku: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 1(2), 182–195.
Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, U., & Yani, J. A. (2016). POLITIK HUKUM JUDICIAL REVIEW KETETAPAN MPR Lutfil Ansori. 6(1).
Josviranto, M. (2020). Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial Dan Humaniora, Volume 1(Nomor 8), Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas N.
Lailam, T. (2021). Problem dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System dalam Pembentukan dan Pengujian Undang-Undang di Indonesia (Problem and Solutions for Arranging of The Checks and Balances System in The Process of Making Law and Constitutional Review in Indonesia). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 12(1), 123–142.
Latif, A., & Chariansyah, H. (2023). Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Wewenang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat ( MPR ) dalam Perspektif Pembentukan Undang-Undang. 6(1), 2444–2455.
Luluardi, Y. D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Political Dynasty in Law and Political Perspective: To What Extent has The Election Law been Reformed. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.44321
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (16th ed.). Kencana.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Negara. BPFH Unnes.
Muhtada, D., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Penataan Regulasi di Indonesia Melalui Lembaga Independen. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 16(2), 278–290. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v16i2.31866
Mutiara, Y. (2001). Implikasi Hukum Pencabutan Tap Mpr No . Xxxiii / Mprs / 1967 , Tap Mpr No . Xi / Mpr / 1998 , Tap Mpr No . Ii / Mpr / 2001 Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia Volume 3 Nomor 1. 3(Xxxiii), 47–51.
Pangaribuan, R. R., Palilingan, T. N., & Wewengkang, F. (2023). Pembagian Kekuasaan Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 12(5), 1–11.
Prasetyo, H., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Law Enforcement in the Aspects of Natural Resources and Environmental. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(1), 43–52.
Pratama, A. B. (2017). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGATURAN IDEAL PENINJAUAN KEMBALI PERKARA PIDANA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 34/PUU-XI/2013. Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, 2.
Pratama, A. B. (2021). Mengukur Imunitas Pejabat Pelaksana Perppu 1/2020 dengan Asas Equality Before the Law. Supremasi Hukum, 17(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v17i2.1406
Pratama, A. B. (2023). Hakim Konstitusi di Persimpangan Jalan : Kuasa Lembaga Pengusul dalam Pemberhentian yang Kontroversial Manabia : Journal of Consitutional Law. 3(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28918/manabia.v3i02.1416
Pratama, A. B. (2024a). Inkonsistensi Norma Penempatan Tentara Nasional Indonesia Sebagai Penjabat Kepala Daerah Pada Masa Transisi atau pensiun dari dinas ketentaraan . Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i1.1884
Pratama, A. B. (2024b). Konstruksi Hukum Pengabulan Isbat Nikah di Bawah Umur dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tegal Nomor. And Civil LawThe Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 109–127.
Pratama, A. B., . A., & Jamin, M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Ideal Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/Puu-Xi/2013. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 5(2), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v5i2.18258
Pratama, A. B., & Aziz, A. (2024). Rational Restrictions Or Pruning Of Rights ? Deadline For Submitting Formal Tests At The Constitutional Court. Jurnal Tapis : Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 20(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.24042
Pratama, A. B., Imaduddin, A., & Asyria, T. (2025). Legal Analysis Of The Appointment Of Acting Officials To Fill Vacancies In Democratic Regional Leadership Positions. Jurnal Tapis : Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 21(1), 117–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v21i1.26235
Pratama, A. B., Manasikana, A., & Fadzlina, N. A. (2023). Efektivitas Layanan Aduan Lapor Bupati Berbasis E-Government di Kabupaten Pekalongan. Jurnal Aplikasi Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis, 4(1), 78–96.
Pratama, A. B., & Sekar, A. (2024). The Conflict of Legal Norms: Islamic Law and Positive Law in the Regulation of Alcoholic Beverages in Pekalongan City. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 12(2 SE-Articles), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v12i2.3671
Pratama, A. B., & Yusron, M. (2024). Advokasi Hak Pilih Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Di Kabupaten Batang. AKM Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.36908
Putri, S. E., & Pratama, A. B. (2025). The Authority of Acting Regional Heads in Employee Mutation : Between Legality and Abuse of Power Manabia : Journal of Consitutional Law. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 129–146.
Rizal, A., Bosowa, U., & Bosowa, U. (2025). Konversi Isi Ketetapan MPR Nomor I Tahun 2003 Menjadi Undang-Undang Ditinjau dari Aspek Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. 5(2), 3475–3485.
Rusnan. (2017). Eksistensi Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945. Jatiswara, 31(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v31i1.35
Said, K., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Determination of Advancement of Technology Against Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 125–134.
Saldi Isra. (2011). KEWENANGAN DAN PRODUK HUKUM MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT SETELAH PEMBERLAKUAN UU No 12 Tahun 2011. 12, 1–9.
Sihombing, E. N. (2024). Ketetapan Majelis Permusyawaratan Dan Pencabutannya. Proceeding APHTN-HAN, 23–50.
Umam, M. R., & Pratama, A. B. (2023). Hak Konstitusional Penyandang Disabilitas Mental dalam Pemilihan Umum. Manabia: Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(2), 287–306.
Widayati, Absori, & Azhari, A. F. (2014). Rekonstruksi Kedudukan Ketetapan MPR Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Media Hukum, 21(2), 264–278.
