Conception of the Contents of the Medina Charter and the 1945 Constitution: The Right to Freedom of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/ajlh.v1i1.600Keywords:
Human Rights, Medina Charter, Right to Freedom of Religion, 1945 ConstitutionAbstract
The right to freedom of religion is a right that must be regulated and guaranteed by the state as a fundamental and universal human right inherent in human beings. This study aims to analyze the differences in the regulation of the right to religious freedom in the Medina Charter and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and their application. This normative juridical research uses a legal and conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that both the Medina Charter and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia have contained provisions regarding the right to freedom of religion, but there are fundamental differences between the two, namely in terms of the difference in regulation between religion and belief. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia stipulates that there are differences between religion and belief, while in the Medina Charter there is no different arrangement between religion and belief. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia only regulates rights, while obligations are not regulated and must be carried out according to their respective beliefs. The conception of differences in regulation between religion and belief in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be an opportunity to cause religious conflict in Indonesia.
References
Ashhidiqe, J. (2006). Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Asnawi, H. S. (2012). Hak Asasi Islam dan Barat;Studi Kritik Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukuman Mati, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Vol. 1, No. 1, Juni.
Bintan R. S., and M Koesnardi.(1988). Ilmu Negara, Cetakan ke-2, Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama.
Dahlan, T, Jazim H, Ni’matul H. (2010). Teori Dan Hukum Konstitusi. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Ibrahim, A. S., Muhammad L, (2018). Kajian HAM dalam Negara The Rule of Law. Lex Scientia Law Review, Vol.1 (No.1).
Lessnoff, M. (1990). Social Contract Theory. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
Mahendra ,Y. I. (1996). Dinamika Tatanegara Indonesia: Kompilasi Aktual Masalah Konstitusi Dewan Perwakilan dan Sistem Kepartaian. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Manan,B. (1996). Politik Perundang-undangan dalam Rangka Mengantisipasi Liberalisme Perekonomian. Bandar Lampung: FH UNLA.
Misrawi,Z. (2009). Madinah Kota Suci, Piagam Madinah, Dan Teladan Muhammad SAW, Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.
Munir, S. (2014). Keidentikan Makna Konstitusi Dengan UUD Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Jurnal IUS,Vol.II,No.5.
Nasution, H. (1985). “Islam Ditinjau dari Berbagai Aspeknya”. Cetakan V. Jilid I. Jakarta: UI Press.
Negri, W. D. (2016). “Kontrak Sosial Menurut Thomas Hobbes Dan John Locke”, Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis,Vol.1,No.2.
Philip, A. (2008). “Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia”,Yogyakarta:Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia (PUSHAM UII) Yogyakarta.
Rio P, Fahmi S, (2004). “Nasionalisme Kaum Pinggiran; Dari Maluku, Tentang Maluku”, Untuk Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Kerjasama LKiS dengan SATUSA Community.
Soemantri, S (2016). “Konstitusi Indonesia : Prosedur Dan Sistem Perubahannya Sebelum Dan Sesudah UUD 1945 Perubahan”, Bandung:PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Solly, L. M. (1982), “Asas-asas Hukum Tata Negara”, Bandung:Alumni.
Strong, C.F. (1963). “Modern Political Constitutions; ; An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Their History and Existing Form”, Sidgwick and Jakson Limited, London, 1963.
Sudjana, E. (1998), “Demokrasi dan Lingkungan Hidup Prespektif Islam”, Yayasan As-Syahidah.
Sukardja, A. (2015). “Piagam Madinah dan Undang-Undang Dasar NRI 1945; Kajian Perbandingan Tentang Dasar Hidup Bersama dalam Masyarakat yang Majemuk”, Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.
Suny, I. (1982). “Mencari Keadilan”, Cet.1. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
