Ontologi Penelitian Hukum Islam Berbasis Paradigma Guba dan Lincoln
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v18i1.2845Abstract
This paper aims to analyze and develop Islamic law research by using paradigms of Guba and Lincoln. This literature study uses a philosophical approach. The results of the study showed that the development of normative and empirical Islamic law research based on the paradigms of Guba and Lincoln is adjusted to the fundamental beliefs of researchers which are recognized based on ontology questions, namely 1) if the researchers’ basic beliefs to understand rules based on “what is it” and “what is written” or textually, it is called positivism paradigm; 2) if the basic beliefs of the researchers in understanding rules of contextual Islamic law, it is included post-positivism paradigm; 3) if the researchers change the false understanding about rules, it is called critical theory paradigm; 4) if the basic beliefs of researchers are obtained from diverse thoughts, then it includes constructive paradigm. These a variety of paradigms will bring about the researchers to answer the problems in the implementation and development of Islamic law research. Therefore, the researchers of Islamic law should develop their researches through these various paradigms from the beginning to the end, so that the paradigms will lead to answering the research problems of contemporary Islamic law.
References
Downloads
Published
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Islam use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.











