Implementation of the Mobile Court Policy in Religious Courts On The Legal Political Perspective
Keywords:
Justice, Legal political, Mobile court, Religious CourtsAbstract
The mobile court policy is a way in which the court can provide the best and equal service to justice seekers by the principles of simplicity, speed and low costs. This research discusses the mobile court policy and its implementation in religious courts from a legal-political perspective. The research method uses empirical juridical. Interviews were conducted with judges and litigants in mobile courts at three Religious Courts, i.e.: Tasikmalaya, Soreang and Subang. Document studies are used to search for regulations and related case documents. The research findings show that the problems with implementing mobile courts in the three religious courts are: the infrastructure for mobile courts is still inadequate because they are held outside the building and far from the Religious Courts; public education is still low, they do not even have an understanding of the law and the judicial process; the judge also acts as a mediator in the mobile court and; case settlement was only carried out twice. This condition is increasingly problematic because most cases are divorces, so the facts in the trial are less accurate and affect the quality of court decisions. An interesting finding is that the mobile court is an effort to provide access to justice for people in unreachable areas by the Religious Courts and as a solution to reduce the divorce rate. However, in fact it increases the divorce rate in the target area. People think that the mobile court makes it easier for them to decide on divorce.
References
Arliman, Laurensius. “Legal Assistance for The Poor To Reach Justice.” Journal Of Legal Scholarship 1, no. 2 (2022): 329–43.
Damis, Harijah. “Conflict Of Court’s Absolute Authority Due To Determination Of Different Subjects Of Dispute.” Judicial Journal, 2018, 75–89.
Ezonfade, Preye. “Mobile Courts Legality in Nigeria, Nigerian Law Forum.” Accessed May 27, 2024. https://nigerianlawforum.com/mobile-courts-legality-in-nigeria/ .
Faruqi, Zainul Bahar. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama Kab. Kediri.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4, no. 2 (2021): 462-469.
Fauzi, M Latif. ““ Efektivitas Sidang Keliling (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Wonogiri).” Al-Adalah 14, no. 2 (2017): 367–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/Adalah.V14i2.2057.
Firmansyah, Nyimas Lidya Putri Pertiwi. “Peran Legal Aid Post Di Pengadilan Agama Metro Masa New Normal.” As-Salam X, no. 1 (2021): 31–46.
Haeratun. “Application of the Principles of Civil Procedure Law Through the Practice of the Court in the Resolution of Family Disputes in the Giri Mang Religious Courts.” International Journal of Integrative Sciences (IJIS) 2, no. 10 (2023): 1607–28.
Kusmayanti, Hazar. “Dispute Settlement Practices Through the Religious Court’s Mobile Court.” Fiat Justicia 14, no. 3 (2020): 287–300. https://doi.org//10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no3.1708.
———. “Implementation Of Supreme Court Regulations Number 1 Of 2015 On The Implementation Of Mobile Courts.” Journal Adhaper 1, no. 2 (2018): 45-50.
———. Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Di Indonesia. Bandung: Logoz, 2018.
Lahilote, Hasyim Sofyan. “The Effectiveness of Mobile Court Implementation in Manado Religious Court.” Al-ISTINBATH Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.3809.
M. Z., Hidayatullah. “The Effectiveness Of Mobile Court Of Sampit Religious Court In Settling Family Law Cases.” Journal Of Religious And Community Studies 2, no. 1 (2016): 217–21.
Maulana N Ritonga, Dwiki, and Kartika Septiani Amiri. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Sampit Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Hukum Keluarga.” Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat 12, no. 2 (2017): 214–30. https://doi.org/10.23971/Jsam.V12i2.480.
Mekka, Marzuki. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penerapan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Sengkang.” Jangpa Jurnal Ada Gau: Public Administration 2, no. 1 (2021): 323–30.
Mufid, Moh, and Adamu Abubakar Muhammad. “Islamic Philanthropy and Public Policy: A Study Of Zakat Fatwas From The New Order Erato The Post-Reform Era.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 21, no. 2 (2023): 201–30. https://doi.org/10.28918/Jhi_V21i2_01.
Nafis Anowar Santo, Md. “Remedy against Conviction by Mobile Courts, The Daily Star.” Accessed May 27, 2024. https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/remedy-against-conviction-mobile-courts-3301921 .
Noferi, Hendri. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat; Studi Kasus Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Muara Labuh Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal Al-Ahkam 10, no. 2 (2019): 104–21. https://doi.org/10.15548/Alahkam.V10i2.1861 .
Nelken, David. "Using the concept of legal culture." Legal Theory and the Social Sciences. Routledge, 2017. 279-303.
Nofialdi. “Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Peradilan Agama, Al-Qisth.” Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum 16, no. 1 (2019): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.32694/010590 .
Nuraeni, Eneng, and Mayaningsih Dewi. “Implikasi Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Ciamis Terhadap Peningkatan Kesadaran Penyelesaian Perkara.” Varia Hukum Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum Dan Kemasyarakatan 1, no. 1 (2019): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.15575/Vh.V1i1.5136.
Pamungkas, Tri Aji. “Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Melalui Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Arga Makmur Dalam Yurisdiksi Kabupaten Mukomuko.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu, 2019.
Putrijanti, Aju. “Administrative Court And Administrative Justice.” Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 2 (2020): 97–112. https://doi/org/10.25041/Fiatjustisia.V14no2.1890.
Röder, Tilmann J. “Mobile Courts, Legal Clinics and Microjustice: How to Improve Access to Justice for People in Fragile Contexts.” Series: Conflict | Law | Peace. Innovations for Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Fragile Contexts, Diverse Contributors, RSF Hub Impulse Paper 2 (2018): 1–6.
S, Anwar. “Ex Aequo Et Bono Arbitration And Islamic Law.” Asy-Syir’ah Journal Of Shari’ah And Legal Sciences, 2017, 367–97.
Sidqi, Imaro, Siti Maymanatun Nisa, and Sukma Daini Hening. “Development Of Artificial Intelligence In The Dispute Resolution Of Religious Courts.” Jurnal Hukum Islam 21, no. 1 (2023): 83–112. https://doi.org/10.28918/Jhi_V21i1_04.
Sung, Huang-Chih. "Can online courts promote access to justice? A case study of the internet courts in China." Computer Law & Security Review 39 (2020): 105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105461
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
Taher, Mohammad Abu, and Siti Zaharah Jamaluddin. "Enhancing access to justice through e-judiciary in Bangladesh: A study." UUM Journal of Legal Studies 13.2 (2022): 317-344. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.13
Tonn, Bruce, et al. "Future of the courts: Fixed, flexible, and improvisational frameworks." Futures 44.9 (2012): 802-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.07.005
U, Women. A Framework For Measuring Access To Justice Including Specific Challenges Facing Women. New York, 2016.
Ulva, Yuhana, Mhd Fakhrurrahman Arif, and Luthfi Ahmad. “Peran Pos Bantuan Hukum (Legal Aid Post) Dalam Memberikan Layanan Bantuan Hukum Di Pengadilan Agama Kuala Tungkal Di Tinjau Perma No. 1 Tahun 2014 Bab V Pasal 25.” Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 2 (2022): 33–54.
Yuanita, Alifa Cikal. “Menelaah Konsep Keadilan Hukum Teori John Rawls Dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Secara Sepihak Terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia Di Luar Negeri.” Interdisciplinary Journal On Law, Social Sciences And Humanities 3, no. 2 (2022): 130–42. https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v3i2.34553.
Z., Ali. “Malaysia’s Mobile Court - Judging in the Still of the Forest. United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime,” 2019. https://www.unodc.org/dohadeclaration/en/news/2019/12/malaysiasmobile-court---judging-in-the-still-of-the-forest.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Islam use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
.png)
