Principles of Reversal Burden of Proof in the Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v20i2.6749Keywords:
Indonesian Criminal Law, Islamic Criminal Law, Reversal Burden of ProofAbstract
The principles of criminal law in Indonesia and Islamic criminal law do not burden the defendant in proving. However, there have been changes to the reverse burden of proof system, especially in cases of corruption and money laundering. This article discusses the principle of reversed burden of proof in Indonesian criminal law and Islamic criminal law. The research method is juridical-normative with statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches. Sources of data using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that there are seven principles of reverse proof in criminal law in Indonesia, namely the principle of justice, the principle of utility, the principle of wealth, the principle of evaluating evidence, the principle of legality, the principle of invisible crime, and the principle of presumption of guilt. Meanwhile, the principles of proof are reversed in Islamic criminal law, namely: intention, justice, maqāṣid al-sharīah, and presumption of guilt. Reverse proof in Islamic criminal law is not only applied in cases of corruption and money laundering, but is applied to all ḥudūd, qiṣāṣ and ta'zīr crimes. The principle of intention only exists in the Islamic criminal law system, because it relates to the divine side.
References
Abd Muhaimin, Abdul Wahab. “Adopsi Hukum Islam Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional (Studi Tentang UU. No. 1 Tahun 1974 Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Buku I Tentang Perkawinan),” n.d.
Abdullah, Abdullah, and Muhammad Hatta. “The Application of the Burden of Proof Concept in Indonesia: A Comparative Study.” Sasi 28, no. 3 (2022): 458. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i3.1045.
Ahmad, Muhammad Mushtaq. “Significanct Features of the Ḥanafī Criminal Law.” AFKĀR Research Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2019): 1–18.
Al- Tirmidhī, Abū ‘Īsā Mu ḥ ammad Ibn ‘Īsā al - Tirmidhī. Al- Jāmi’ Al - Kabīr Li Abī ‘Īsā Mu ḥ Ammad Ibn ‘Īsā Al - Tirmidhī. Vol. V. Beirut: Dār al -Gharb al- Islāmī, 1996.
Al-Mubarakfuri, Shafiyurrahman. “Sirah Nabi: Ringkasan Buku Sejarah Nabi Saw Yang Fenomenal, Al-Rahiq Al-Makhtum.” Bandung: Mizan, 2013.
Allen, Jackson. “Rethinking the Relationship between Reverse Burdens and the Presumption of Innocence.” The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 25, no. 2 (2021): 115–34.
Analiansyah, M A. “HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM.” Al-Mursalah 2, no. 1 (2018).
Bahnasi, A F. “Naẓariyyah Al-Ithbāt Fī Al-Fiqh Al-Jinā’ī Al-Islāmī.” Kaherah: Dar Al-Syuruq, 1989.
Bentham, Jeremy. “Teori Perundang-Undangan Prinsip-Prinsip Legislasi, Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Pidana.” Bandung: Penerbit Nusamedia & Penerbit Nuansa, 2006.
Firmansyah. “Mantan Gubernur Ridwan Mukti Dan Istrinya Divonis 8 Tahun Penjara.” Kompas.com. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2018/01/11/19332111/mantan-gubernur-ridwan-mukti-dan-istrinya-divonis-8-tahun-penjara.
Fuady, Munir. “Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana Dan Perdata).” Bandung: Citra Aditya, 2006.
Gunawan, Imam. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori Dan Praktik. Bumi Aksara, 2022.
Hamzah, Andi. “Pemberantasan Korupsi: Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional Dan Internasional,” 2005.
———. “Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Berbagai Negara,” 2005.
Hartanti, Evi. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Bagian Kedua.” Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2016.
Hatta, Muhammad, Zulfan Sumiadi, and Dan T Yudi Afrizal. “Ratio Legis Penerapan Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Di Indonesia (Komparasi Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam),” n.d.
Haykel, Bernard. “Theme Issue: Evidence in Islamic Law.” Islamic Law and Society, 2002, 129–31.
Ian McWalters, S C. “Memerangi Korupsi Sebuah Peta Jalan Untuk Indonesia.” JPBooks, Surabaya, 2006.
Irman, Tubagus. “Money Laundering Hukum Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Penetapan Tersangka.” Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2017.
Kamalludin, Iqbal. “Restoration of Pancasila Values Against Criminal Law Reform Strategy in Indonesia Political Perspective of Islamic Law.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 22, no. 1 (2022): 31–47.
Kamalludin, Iqbal, and B. N. Arief. “Kebijakan Reformasi Maqâshid Al-Syarîah Dan Kontribusinya Dalam Formulasi Alternatif Keringanan Pidana Penjara.” Al-’Adalah 15, no. 1 (2019): 181–218. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v%vi%i.2931.
Kamalludin, Iqbal, and Barda Nawawi Arief. “Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Tentang Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Di Dunia Maya.” Law Reform 15, no. 1 (n.d.): 113–29.
Kamalludin, Iqbal, Hirda Rahma, Aldila Arumita Sari, and Pujiyono. “Politik Hukum Dalam Kebijakan Hukum Pidana LGBT.” Cita Hukum 6, no. 2 (2018): 317–42. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v6i2.7805 Abstract.
Kamalludin, Iqbal, Heris Suhendar, Bunga Desyana Pratami, Alamul Yaqin, and Nur Afifah. “Criminal Law Treats for Online Gambling Performers: Investment Fraud Modes.” Dialogia Iuridica 14, no. 1 (2022): 26–51.
Kayadibi, Saim. “The State As An Essential Value (Ḍarūriyyāt) of the Maqāṣid Al-Sharī ‘Ah.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 19, no. 1 (2019): 1–18.
Khaldun, Ibn, and Ahmadie Thoha. “Muqaddimah, Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus; Cet.” VII, 2008.
Larasati, Genoveva Puspitasari. “Comparison of Law in Indonesia and Singapore Concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 25 (n.d.): 95–102.
Lopa, B. Kejahatan Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2001. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DYfaAAAAMAAJ.
Lym, Joshua Ho Fung. “The Reversal of The Burden of Proof.” Academia 58, no. 2010 (2015): 23–25.
McCauliff, Catherine M A. “Burdens of Proof: Degrees of Belief, Quanta of Evidence, or Constitutional Guarantees.” Vand. L. Rev. 35 (1982): 1293.
Pope, Jeremy. Strategi Memberantas Korupsi: Elemen Sistem Integritas Nasional. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2003.
Purwadianto, Agus. “Perkosaan Sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia; Kajian Filosofis Metodologi Pembuktian Hukum.” Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Rusyd, Ibn. “Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtasid.” Juz II, Beirut: Dâr Al-Jiil, t. Th, 1989.
Sadek, Karim. “Maṣlaḥa and Rachid Al-Ghannushi’s Reformist Project.” In Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿa and Contemporary Reformist Muslim Thought: An Examination, 151–75. Springer, 2014.
Setiadi, Wicipto, and Beniharmoni Harefa. “The Principle of Reversal Burden of Proof in Act of Money Laundering in Indonesia.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 9, no. 7 (2019): 197–209.
Smith, Bruce P. “The Presumption of Guilt and the English Law of Theft, 1750–1850.” Law and History Review 23, no. 1 (2005): 133–71.
Soerjono, Soekanto. “Pengantar Penelitian Hukum.” Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 1986.
Syahriar, Alfa, and Zahrotun Nafisah. “Comparison of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Asy-Syathibi and Ibn ‘Ashur Perspective of Usul Al-Fiqh Four Mazhab.” Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2020): 185–97.
Tapper, Colin. “The Law of Evidence and the Rule of Law.” The Cambridge Law Journal 68, no. 1 (2009): 67–89.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Hukum Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Islam use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/(default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
.png)
