The Position of Signs of Hikayat in the Tafsir Al-Ibriz by Biṣri Musṫofa

Authors

  • Ela Sartika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an As-Syifa Subang
  • Ruli Jafrullah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an As-Syifa Subang
  • Kiki Dasuki Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an As-Syifa Subang
  • Abdul Rauf bin Rimi Institute Kemahiran Islam Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v6i2.12474

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aims to examine the position of hikayat signs in Tafsir Al-Ibriz by Biṣri Musṫofa, a Nusantara mufassir known for his communicative and narrative approach in conveying the message of the Qur'an. The background of this research is based on the need to understand how hikayat, which are often considered mere folk tales or additional elements, actually play an important role in grounding the messages of the Qur'an to the general public.

Method: This research uses a descriptive analysis method with a semiotic approach. Data collection techniques were carried out through a literature study of the Tafsir Al-Ibriz manuscript and the reference sources used, including classical tafsir such as Tafsir Al-Khazin.

Main Results: The signs of hikayat in Tafsir Al-Ibriz do not merely serve as complementary stories, but as semiotic devices that connect the denotative aspects of the Qur'anic text with the connotative aspects of Javanese culture through the mechanism of myth as a second level of meaning, while also reconstructing classical sources such as Tafsir Al-Khazin in the local context of the archipelago.

Contributions: This study contributes to enriching the study of Nusantara interpretation by revealing the strategic role of hikayat as a semiotic sign that reinforces the delivery of moral messages and contextualization of the Qur'an in Tafsir Al-Ibriz by KH. Biṣri Musṫafa.

Conclusions: This study concludes that the use of hikayat signs in Tafsir Al-Ibriz is an effective semiotic strategy for grounding the message of the Qur'an through the integration of revelatory texts, classical exegetical traditions, and Javanese cultural symbols, thereby enriching the contextual and culturally sensitive hermeneutic tradition of the archipelago.

Keywords:

Position, Hikayat, Tafsir Al-Ibriz, Bisri Mustafa, Local

References

Abidin, Ahmad Zainal, Thoriqul Aziz, and Rizqa Ahmadi. 2022. “Vernacularization Aspects in Bisri Mustofa’S Al-Ibriz Tafsir.” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir 7 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v7i1.3383.

Al-Khāzin. 1415. Lubāb Al-Ta’wīl Fī Ma’āni Al-Tanzīl Jilid II. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah.

Amin, Arwani. 2024. “Kisah Dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Ilmu UshuluddinAl-Hikmah 1 (1): 35.

Barthes, Roland. 2001. Pertualangan Semiologi Roland Barthes. Pustaka Pelajar.

Chairullah, M Ranah. 2022. “Analisis Proses Kisah Kehancuran Pasukan Abrahah Dalam Tafsir Al-Khazin.” IAIN Curup. https://e-theses.iaincurup.ac.id/id/eprint/1718%0Ahttp://e-theses.iaincurup.ac.id/1718/1/M. Ranah Chairullah.pdf.

Fahmi, Izzul. 2019. “Lokalitas Kitab Tafsir Al-Ibriz Karya KH. Bisri Mustafa.” ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 5 (1): 96–119.

Ghozali, Mahbub. 2020. “Kosmologi Dalam Tafsir Al-Ibriz Karya Bisri Mustafa: Relasi Tuhan, Alam Dan Manusia.” Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 19 (1): 112. https://doi.org/10.18592/al-banjari.v19i1.3583.

Gufron Maksum, Nur Afiyah. 2024. “Pemikiran Dan Aspek Lokalitas Tafsir Al- Ibrīz.” Adh Dhiya 1 (1): 81.

Gusmian, Islah. 2013. Khazanah Tafsir Indonesia, Dari Hermeneutika Hingga Ideologi. Jakarta: Teraju.

Handayani, Nanik. 2022. “MENGULIK NILAI – NILAI PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER DALAM HIKAYAT ARABIA ABAD PERTENGAHAN KARYA MALCOLM C.LYONS (Edisi 1) DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN SASTRA.” Totobuang 10 (1): 141–56. https://doi.org/10.26499/totobuang.v10i1.365.

Humaedah. 2021. “Kisah-Kisah Dalam Al-Qur’an Perspektif Pendidikan Islam.” Jurnal PAI Raden Falah 3 (2): 111–23.

Igisani, Rithon. 2018. “Kajian Tafsir Mufassir Di Indonesia.” Potret Pemikiran 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v22i1.757.

Ikhsan, Ahmad Nur. 2022. “Corak Tasawuf Dalam Tafsir Al-Ibriz Kh. Bisri Musthafa.” UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Kusumasari, Meida, Ahmad Ripai, Sutji Harijanti, and Satria Fitra Widya Utama. 2023. “Analisis Nilai-Nilai Teks Hikayat Indera Bangsawan Dan Pembelajarannya Kelas X.” Journal on Teacher Education 5 (1): 455–65.

Lakmana, Ghairi, Muhammad Roihan Nasution, and Fitriani Fitriani. 2023. “Analisis Rujukan Dan Keunikan Dalam Kitab Tafsir Tarjuman Mustafid.” Al-Wasathiyah: Journal of Islamic Studies 2 (2): 251–66. https://doi.org/10.56672/alwasathiyah.v2i2.96.

Lusianti, Errika Febi, Faridah Faridah, and Dwi Setia Ningsih. 2025. “Peran Cerita Hikayat Hang Tuah Mewujudkan Nilai Budaya Dan Karakter Bangsa.” EUNOIA (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia) 4 (2): 142. https://doi.org/10.30821/eunoia.v4i2.4214.

Maghfiroh, Anisa Yaumil. 2023. “Penggunaan Bahasa Krama Inggil Dalam Penyifatan Allah (Kajian Sosiolinguistik Dan Pragmatik Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Ibriz Karya Bisri Mustofa).” IAIN Ponorogo.

Misnawati, Misnawati. 2023. “Pemikiran KH. Biṣri Mustofa Dan Tradisi Kultural Jawa Dalam Tafsir Al-Ibrīz.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 8 (1): 123. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i1.19880.

Motzki, Harald. 2000. The Biography of Muhammad The Issue of the Sources. Leiden.

Musṭafa, Biṣri. n.d. Al-Ibriz Li Ma’rifati Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Qur’an Al-’Aziz Bi Lughah Jawiyah. Kudus: Menara Kudus.

Mustofa, Bisri. n.d. Al-Ibriz Li Ma’rifati Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Qur’an Al-’Aziz Bi Lughah Jawiyah. Jilid 1. Kudus: Menara Kudus.

Muwaffaq, Muhammad Mufid. 2020. “Indikasi Tafsîr Al-’Ilmî Dalam Tafsir Al-Ibrîz Karya Bisri Musthafa.” Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Dan Al-Hadis 8 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v8i1.5882.

Octaviyani, Imelda. 2024. “Konsep Tauhid Dalam Al- Qur’an: Kajian Semiotika Roland Barthes.” Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Permatasari, Oktaviani, Abdul Rohman, Ela Sartika, Fuadiyati Firdausiana, and Durin Farida. 2024. Tafsir Nusantara (Era Klasik Sampai Modern). Malang: Future Science.

Pink, Johanna. n.d. “Tradition, Authority and Innovation in Contemporary Sunnī Tafsīr: Towards a Typology of Qur’an Commentaries from the Arab World, Indonesia and Turkey.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 12 (2).

https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/jqs.2010.0105.

Rippin, Andrew. 2016. The Qur’an and Its Interpretative Tradition. New York: Routledge.

Saleh, Walid A. 2004. The Formation of The Classical Tafsir Tradition: The Qur’an Commentary of Al-Tha’labi (D. 427/1035). Leiden: Kominklijke Brill NV.

Sartika, Ela, and Amin Amin. 2023. “Examining Al-Khazin’s Influence on Tafsir Writing in Indonesia (A Study of 17th and 20th Century Tafsir).” Journal Analytica Islamica 12 (2): 319. https://doi.org/10.30829/jai.v12i2.18087.

Suri, Sufian, and Sayed Akhyar. 2020. “MENGENAL ISRAILIYAT DALAM TAFSIR AL-KHAZIN.” Al- I’jaz : Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam 6 (2): 128–44.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-05

Article Statistics

136 Views
143 Downloads

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

The Position of Signs of Hikayat in the Tafsir Al-Ibriz by Biṣri Musṫofa. (2025). Aqwal: Journal of Qur’an and Hadis Studies, 6(2), 180-199. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v6i2.12474