The Meaning of Na’l in QS. Tāhā [20]: 12 (Semiotic Analysis By Roland Barthes)

MUHAMMAD TAUFIQ

doi:10.28918/aqwal.v6i2.12380

Authors

MUHAMMAD TAUFIQ UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v6i2.12380

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This article examine the meaning of na’l (sandals) in the story of Prophet Moses as recorded in QS. Tāhā [20]: 12. Although na’l is often viewed as a profane object, it indicates a deep and significant meaning. This study assumes that the meaning of na’l is not limited to its literal dimension, but encompasses a broader and more universal meaning.

Methodology: This study uses qualitative methods with a literature reviwe. To uncover these layers of meaning, Roland Barthes' semiotic approach is used, which consists of two levels of analysis, namely linguistic and mythological. This approach was chosen based on its ability to reveal new meanings in understanding ideology, culture, and social constructs.

Main Results: The term na'l is not merely understood as a physical object in the form of footwear, but has been transformed into a symbol of all forms of obstacles, both physical and spiritual. Therefore, the interpretation of this verse contains a message for humans to remove all obstacles that prevent them from facing Allah.

Conclusions: The semiotic approach emphasizes the importance of reading the Qur’an by paying attention to the symbolic context and the hidden meaning structure behind the text.

Keywords:

Na’l, Al-Qur’an, Semiotic

References

Abdalla Mikhaeil, C., & Baskerville, R. L. (2019). Using semiotics to analyze representational complexity in social media. Information and Organization, 29(4), 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100271

Al-Biqā’ī, B. al-D. A. al-Ḥasan I. ibn ‘Umar. (2006). Naẓm al-Durar fī Tanāsub al-Āyāt wa al-Suwar (Vol. 8). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Jawharī, T. (1350). Al-Jawāhir fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an al-Karīm (Vol. 9). Matba’ah Muṣtafā al-Bābī al- Ḥalabī.

Al-Marāgi, A. M. (1974). Tafsīr al-Marāgi (Vol. 15). Matba’ah Muṣtafā al-Bābī al- Ḥalabī.

Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya Edisi Penyempurnaan 2019. (t.t.). Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an Kementerian Agama RI.

Al-Sya’rāwī, M. M. (1991). Tafsīr al-Sya’rāwī (Vol. 15). Akhbār al-Yawm.

Al-Zuhaili, W. (1991). Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-‘Aqīdah wa al-Syarī’ah wa al-Manhaj (Vol. 8). Dār al-Fikr.

Amrullah, H. A. M. A. K. (1990). Tafsir Al-Azhar (Vol. 6). Pustaka Nasional PTE LTD.

Andalusi, A. Ḥayyān M. bin Y. bin ‘Alī bin Y. bin Ḥayyān. (2010). Baḥr al-Muḥīṭ (Vol. 7). Dār al-Fikr.

Anwar, S. S., An, A. N., Rhain, A., & Suharjianto, S. (2022). Application of Roland Barthes’ Semiotics to QS. An-Naml [27]: 44 on the Bared Legs of Queen Balqis: International Conference on Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies (ICIMS 2022), Surakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220708.025

Bagawī, A. M. al-Ḥusain bin M. (1441). Ma’ālim al-Tanzīl fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (Vol. 5). Dar Taybah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzi’.

Bāqi, M. F. ‘Abd. (1364). Al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfāzh al-Qur’ān al-Karīm. Dār al-Ḥadīṡ.

Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies. The Noonday Press.

Barthes, R. (2007). Membedah Mitos-Mitos Budaya Massa: Semiotika atau Sosiologi Tanda, Simbol, dan Representasi. Jalasutra.

Barthes, R. (2011). Mitologi. Kreasi Wacana.

Bayḍāwī, N. al-D. A. S. ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar bin M. al-Syīrāzī. (1998). Anwār al-Tanzīl wa Asrār al-Ta’wīl (Vol. 4). Dār Iḥya’ al-Turaṡ al-‘Arabī.

Bouzida, F. (2014). The Semiology Analysis in Media Studies: Roland Barthes Approach. Proceedings of SOCIOINT14- International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities.

Damsyiqī, A. al-F. I. bin ‘Umar bin K. al-Qurasyī. (1999). Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-Aẓīm (Vol. 5). Dār Ṭaybah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzi’.

Duncan, J. S., & Nancy, D. G. (1998). Ideology and Bliss: Roland Barthes and The Secret Histories of Landscape,” in Postmodernism: Critical Concepts. Routledge.

Fatah, A. (2020). Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes Tentang Ashabul Fil. Al-Tadabbur, 5(2).

Ḥalabī, S. (1996). ‘Umdah al-Huffāẓ fī Tafsīr Asyraf al-Alfāẓ (Vol. 4). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah.

Hasan, D. B. N. (2016). Kontribusi Semiotika dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab, 1(2), 550–555.

He, J., & Shao, B. (2018). Examining the dynamic effects of social network advertising: A semiotic perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.014

Hidayat, A. A. (2009). Filsafat Bahasa Mengungkap Bahasa, Makna dan Tanda. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hidayat, K. (1996). Memahami Bahasa Agama: Sebuah Kajian Hermeneutik. Paramadina.

Innis, R. E. (1985). Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology. Indiana University Press.

Kaelan. (2017). Filsafat Bahasa Semiotika dan Hermeneutika. Paradigma.

Khalidi, T. (2021). Images of Muhammad: Evolusi Citra Nabi Muhammad Sepanjang Sejarah. IRCiSoD.

Kumalasari, A. M. (2021). Makna Qiradah dalam Kisah Bani Israil. Jurnal Al-Fanar, 4(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.33511/alfanar.v4n2.167-176

Malia, H., & Atmi, S. N. (2023). ANALISIS MAKNA HURUN ‘IN DALAM AL-QUR’AN (KAJIAN TEORI SEMIOTIKA ROLAND BARTHES). Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Qur’an dan al-Hadits, 17(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171556700

Manzhūr, I. (1363). Lisān al-‘Arab (Vol. 11). Dār Ṣadr.

Maulana Akbar, F. (2024). Makna Kursi Dalam Surat Al-Baqarah (2):255 Anlisis Semiotika Roland Barthes. Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v5i2.1183

Mufidah, M. (2011). Kontribusi Semiotika dalam Kajian Islam. Jurnal Indo-Islamika, 1(2), 179–187.

Qaṭṭān, M. K. (t.t.). Mabāhiṡ fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Maktabah Wahbah.

Rāzī, A. ‘Abdullah M. bin ‘Umar bin al-Ḥasan bin al-Ḥusain al-Taimī. (1420). Mafātīh al-Gaib. Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turaṡ al-‘Arabī.

Rusmana, D. (2014). Filsafat Semiotika: Paradigma, Teori dan Metode Interpretasi Tanda Dari Semiotika Struktural Hingga Dekonstruksi Praktis. Pustaka Setia.

Salim, P., & Salim, Y. (2002). Kamus Bahasa Indonesia Kontemporer. Modern English Press.

Saussure, F. D. (1915). Course in General Linguistics. Hill Book Company.

Shihab, Q. (2002). Tafsir al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an (Vol. 8). Lentera Hati.

Shihab, Q. (2013). Kaidah Tafsir. PT Lentera Hati.

Suhardi, H., suriyadi, & Satria, O. (2023). Semiosis Kata-Kata dalam Al-Qur’an Berdasarkan Teori Semiotika Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd. Prosiding Fakultas Ushuluddin Arab dan Dakwah, 1(2), 167–185.

Syaḥrūr, M. (2010). Al-Qaṣaṣ Al-Qur’ānī: Qirā’ah Mu‘āṣirah (Madkhal Ilā Al-Qaṣaṣ Wa Qiṣṣah Ādam). Dār al-Sāqī.

Unzila, A. R., & Balqis, P. (2025). MAKNA SĪRŪ FĪ AL-ARḌ DALAM QS. AL-AN’AM [6]: 11 (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes). Jurnal Studi Islam dan Sosial, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.61941/iklila.v8i1.366

Wijaya, R. (2021). Makna Syifa dalam al-Qur’an (Analisis Semiotika Roland Barthes pada QS al-Isra 82). Al-Adabiya: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Keagamaan, 16(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.37680/adabiya.v16i2.924

Zahrah, H. S. (2023). ANALISIS SEMIOLOGI ROLAND BARTHES PADA TERM ZAHRAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN. Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 3(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.57163/almuhafidz.v3i2.76

Zakariyā, A. al-Ḥusain A. bin F. (t.t.). Maqāyīs al-Lugah (Vol. 5). Dār al-Fikr.

Zhang, X., & Sheng, J. (2017). A Peircean semiotic interpretation of a social sign. Annals of Tourism Research, 64, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.04.002.