An Analysis of Mahmud Abu Rayyah’s Criticism on Abu Hurairah’s Credibility as a Hadith Narrator
Analisis Kritik Mahmud Abu Rayyah terhadap Kredibilitas Abu Hurairah sebagai Perawi Hadis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v5i1.2319Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aims at analyzing Mahmud Abu Rayyah's allegations against Abu Hurairah one of the leading transmitters of hadith as well as evaluating the validity of these allegations in hadith narration. Methodology: The study used a descriptive qualitative method with primary data from hadith books and secondary data from modern literature and scholarly journals. The analysis was done through the stages of verification, reduction, thematic arrangement, and interpretation of data.
Main Results: The results show that Mahmud Abu Rayyah's accusations against Abu Hurairah are based on misinterpretation and lack of contextual understanding. Abu Hurairah, although only with the Prophet for about three years, played an important role in hadith narration. The traditions he narrated have been verified by scholars and accepted in the hadith literature. Involvement: This study reinforces Abu Hurairah's position as a credible narrator and highlights the importance of sanad and matan criticism methods in hadith verification. Conclusions: Abu Rayyah's allegations have proven to be unfounded and this study underscores the efforts of scholars in preserving the authenticity of hadith. Future research should include a broader perspective of schools of thought and explore the impact of hadith polemics on contemporary religious understanding and practice.
Keywords:
References
Abdul-Rahman, M., & others. (2021). Methods of Hadith Validation. Journal of Islamic Studies, 32(3), 319–330.
Ahmad, A. (2021). The Science of Hadith: An Introduction. International Journal of Islamic Studies, 15(3), 102–117.
Ajaj al-Khatib, M. (1981). Al-Sunnah Qabla al-Tadwin. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Bukhari, M. I. (2021). Sahih al-Bukhari. Dar al-Salam.
Ali, H., & Ahmed, S. (2022). Controversies in Hadith Transmission. International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 54(1), 65–80.
Al-Tirmidhi, M. I. (2020). Sunan al-Tirmidhi. Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyah.
Ash Shiddieqy, H. (1974). Sejarah dan pengantar Ilmu Hadis. Bulan Bintang.
Baharuddin, M. A. (2014). Visi-Misi Ma’ânî al-Hadîth dalam Wacana Studi Hadîth. Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v2i2.29
Baharuddin, M. A., Soebahar, M. E., & Mujibatun, S. (2020). Validity of Pre-Islamic Arabic Literature as a Source of Authentication of Hadis. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 21(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2102-11
Bin Hanbali, A. (n.d.). Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal. al-Maktabah al-Islamiyah.
Brown, J. A. C. (2019). The Canonization of Hadith and the Prospects for Scriptural Unity in Islam. Islamic Law and Society, 26(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00261P01
Duderija, A. (2019). Constructing a Religiously Ideal “Believer” and “Woman” in Islam: Neo-Traditional Salafi and Progressive Muslims’ Methods of Interpretation. Islamic Law and Society, 26(1–2), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-0261P01
Esposito, J. L. (2001). Ensiklopedi Oxford, Dunia Islam Modern (Vol. 2). Mizan.
Gibb, H. A. R. (1961). Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam. Oxford University Press.
Gleave, R. (2021). Between Legalism and Mysticism: Contexts of Hadith Interpretation. Religion Compass, 15(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12345
Hamid, A. (2022). Hadith and Its Methodology. Journal of Islamic Research, 28(1), 140–155.
Hasan, I. (1999). Kontroversi Hadis di Mesir. Mizan.
Hasan Lubis, H. (1971). al-Hadits dan Orientalisme. Seri Media Da‘wah No. 40.
Hassan, A., & others. (2021). Historical Critique of Hadith Narrators. Islamic Historical Review, 29(2), 180–200.
Ismail, M. S. (1996). Kriteria Sanad dan Matan: Kriteria Hadis Shahih. In Y. Ilyas & M. Mas’udi (Eds.), Pengembangan Pemikiran Terhadap Hadis. Lembaga Pengkajian dan Pengamalan Islam Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Ismail, S. (1986). Hadis Palsu. Majalah Amanah, 89.
Kamali, M. H. (2021). Hadith Interpretation in the Context of Modernity. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/mwjhr-2021-0001
Kathir, I. I. (2019). Tafsir al-Quran al-Azim. Dar al-Hadith.
Khan, M., & Nordin, A. (2021). The Role of Companions in Hadith Transmission. Journal of Islamic Tradition, 23(4), 230–250.
Malik, F., & others. (2020). Principles of Hadith Authentication. Hadith Studies Quarterly, 17(2), 90–110.
Motzki, H. (2019). The Origins of Islamic Law: The Qur’an, the Muwatta’ and Madinan Amal. Journal of Islamic Studies, 30(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etb004
Muslim, M. I. (2018). Sahih Muslim. Darussalam.
Nasution, A. (2019). Hadith Transmission and Preservation. Islamic Quarterly, 22(4), 77–92.
Osman, L. (1970). Ringkasan Sejarah Islam. Wijaya.
Rahman, A., & Farid, M. (2023). The Integrity of Hadith Narrators: Case Study of Abu Hurairah. Journal of Religious Studies, 48(1), 120–135.
Rayyah, A. (n.d.). Adhwâ` ‘ala al-Sunnah Muhammadiyyah, Au Difa’ ‘an al-Hadits. Dar al-Ma‘arif.
Rayyah, A. (1969). Syeikh al-Mudhirah Abu Hurairah. Dar al-Ma‘arif.
Ruson, A. H. G. (1961). Shorter Encyclopaedia of Islam. London.
Sadeghi, B. (2020). The Logic of Hadith Transmission. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 52(4), 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743820001087
Shiddiqi, H. A. (2020). Fundamentals of Hadith Studies. Pustaka Islam.
Syakir, A. M. (2005). Risalah, tahqiq. Maktabah al-Syuruq wa al-Dauliyah.
Syaltut, M. (1966). al-Islam Aqidat wa Syari’ah. Dar al-Qalam.
Yaakob, M. A. bin. (2023). The Method of Matn Hadith Criticism According to al-Daraqutni. Aqwal: Journal of Qur’an and Hadis Studies, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v4i1.341
Yusuf, I., & Omar, H. (2022). Debating the Authenticity of Hadiths. Journal of Islamic Research, 37(1), 40–55.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ruston Nawawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Aqwal: Journal of Quran and Hadies Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in Aqwal: Journal of Quran and Hadies Studies agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
