<b>Konstruksi Yuridis Alasan Mendesak dalam Dispensasi Nikah: Analisis terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim</b>

Authors

  • Inna Ngazizah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kudus
  • Fahris Muadhim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/9w1zyp76

Abstract

Marriage dispensation is a case that is not infrequently handled by the court. Law Number 16 of 2019 regulates that in accepting marriage dispensation must be accompanied by a very urgent reason. However, the guidelines do not explain the criteria for urgent reasons. This becomes an ijtihad for judges personally in interpreting it. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influence judges in determining a marriage dispensation application, to determine the judge's views on urgent reasons in marriage dispensation cases, and to determine the analysis of the views of judges at the Demak Religious Court regarding urgent circumstances in Article 7 Paragraph 2 of Law Number 16 of 2019. This study was a field research with a qualitative approach that took place at the Demak Religious Court involving 3 informants. The results of the study showed that the Demak Religious Court Judges in handling marriage dispensation cases were influenced by several factors, namely pregnant candidates, economic, physical, and spiritual readiness, local community customs and the approval of the candidates. It is known that the urgent reason according to the view of the Demak Religious Court Judge is the concern that there will be adultery, immoral acts and promiscuity if the child is not married because of their closeness, the urgent reason is concluded as a situation where the relationship of the prospective couple can no longer be postponed considering that the negative impacts that arise will be greater. The Judge's view has overlapped with Article 7 Paragraph (2) as a condition for receiving a marriage dispensation and has fulfilled three basic legal values, namely justice, benefit and legal certainty which refer to the principles in Perma No. 5 of 2019. However, it does not fully contain legal certainty because in this marriage dispensation regulation there are many rules that still overlap and have multiple interpretations so that the rules are not focused where it is not explained what the urgent reasons are.

Keywords:

Judge's View, Marriage Dispensation, Urgent Reasons

References

Abdul, M. (2001). Kaidah-Kaidah Ilmu Fiqh (Al-Qowa’idul Fiqhiyyah). Dalam Jakarta: Kalam Mulia.

Albi, A., & Johan, S. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Sukabumi: CV. Jejak.

Dihan, MH. (2022). Dispensasi Nikah, Bagai Makan Buah Simalakama. https://pa-banjarnegara.go.id/v2/135-artikel-peradilan/578-dispensasi-nikah-bagai-makan-buah-simalakama-catatan-akhir-tahun-2022

Hakim, M. L. (2019). Aplikasi Konsep Fiqh Sosial KH. MA Sahal Mahfudh terhadap Batas Usia Perkawinan dalam Pasal 7 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, 8(2), 207–234.

Hanifah, A., & Siregar, R. S. (2026). Interpretasi Hakim terhadap “Alasan Sangat Mendesak” dalam Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah di Pengadilan Agama Medan Kelas IA. el-Bait: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 178–193.

Hidayat, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Melalui Penafsiran Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan. Pandecta Research Law Journal.

Hudafi, H. (2020). Pembentukan Keluarga Sakinah Mawaddah Warahmah menurut Undang –Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 172–181.

Ibrahim, D. (2019). Al-QawaId Al-Fiqhiyah (Kaidah-Kaidah Fiqih). Palembang: Noerfikri.

Inayah, N. (2017). Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah Akibat Hamil Di Luar Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta Tahun 2010-2015 (Analisis Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama). Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 10(2), 178–193.

Irwan. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum . http://irwaaan.blogspot.co.id/2013/11/metodologi-penelitian-hukum.html

Khuluq, M. K. (2021). Menikah dan Becerai Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia, Mengulik Persoalan Perceraian dan Dispensasi Kawin.

Manan, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Praktek Hukum Acara Di Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(2), 189–202.

Mawardi Sufyan, A. F. (2017). Analisis Kritis Makna “Al-Syabab” Dan “Istitha’Ah” Pada Hadits Anjuran Menikah. Al-Ulum : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pemikiran Ke Islaman, 4(2), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.31102/alulum.4.2.2017.304-317

Munawaroh, L. (2019). Kesehatan Tes Sebagai Syarat Pra Nikah (Studi UU Pernikahan di Kuwait). YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v10i1.4684

Neltje, J., & Panjiyoga, I. (2023). Nilai-Nilai Yang Tercakup Di Dalam Asas Kepastian Hukum. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(5), 2034–2039.

Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2019, Legis. No. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Permohonan Dispensasi Kawin, Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 (2019).

Radbruch, G. (1950). Legal Philosophy. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mjHhvQEACAAJ

Safira, L., Judiasih, S. D., & Yuanitasari, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Perkawinan Bawah Umur Tanpa Dispensasi Kawin Dari Pengadilan. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 210–225.

Sofyah, E. (2024). Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pengadilan Agama Demak Tahun 2023 [Laporan Kegiatan]. Pengadilan Agama Demak.

Sudikno, M. (2005). Mengenal hukum suatu pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Sugiyono, P. (2010). Metode Peneliian. Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D.

Tanya, B. L. (2013). Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi.

UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974, Legis. No. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (1974).

UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perkawinan (2019).

Legis. No. UU Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 (2019).

Downloads

Published

22-10-2026

Article Statistics

0 Views
0 Downloads

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

Konstruksi Yuridis Alasan Mendesak dalam Dispensasi Nikah: Analisis terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim. (2026). Al-Hukkam: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 6(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.28918/9w1zyp76