<i>At‑Tijārah al‑Mubīqah </i>(Destructive Business and Trade): Qurʾān, <i>Ḥadīth</i>, <i>Qawā‘id al-Fiqhiyyah</i> and <i>Maqā</i><i>ṣid al-Sharī‘ah</i> Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28918/religia.v29i1.8595Abstract
This study aims to analyse and formulate a conceptual framework of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah based on the perspectives of the Qurʾān, ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah. Three research questions are addressed: (1) what is the conceptual definition of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah, and how does it differ from ideal business and trade when viewed through the Qurʾān, ḥadīth, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah, with ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt as the main normative framework; (2) how can the manifestations of ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt be identified and explained as forms of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah in the modern context through the analysis of qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah and the assessment of their impact on maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah; and (3) how can an integrated conceptual framework of at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah be constructed and function as a normative reference for contemporary business practice. This study employs a qualitative approach through library research, using a normative‑descriptive and analytical‑conceptual design. Data are collected from primary sources and reinforced by secondary sources, and analysed using content analysis combined with tafsīr mauḍūʿī, qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah, and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah as analytical tools. The study shows that at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah encompasses all tijārah activities that contain one or more elements of ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, identified through qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah as ḍarar that must be eliminated, and that substantially damage maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah at a significant, widespread, and sustained level. Seven main manifestations are identified in the modern business ecosystem: shirk, magic (siḥr), structural soul murder, ribā, consuming the wealth of orphans, betrayal of trust (amānah), and fitnah against the honour of Muslim women. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to systematically construct at‑tijārah al‑mubīqah as a formal academic taxonomy in Islamic business ethics explicitly derived from ḥadīth al‑sabʿu al‑mubīqāt, while simultaneously integrating qawāʿid al‑fiqhiyyah and maqāṣid al‑sharīʿah into a single four‑layer conceptual framework. The study offers a novel reading, particularly of three categories of al‑mubīqāt in the landscape of modern business: the ḥadīth phrase “killing a soul is forbidden by Allah Subḥānahu Wa Taʿālā, except with ḥaq” is positioned as structural soul murder; the prohibition of “fleeing from the battlefield” is read as betrayal of trust (amānah); and “accusing a chaste Muslim woman of adultery (qadzaf)” is interpreted as fitnah against the honour of Muslim women. Accordingly, this study not only broadens the conceptual discourse but also enriches the ethical‑empirical mapping of destructive patterns within contemporary business ecosystems
Keywords:
References
Abdurahman, I. (2023). Prinsip Asasi Hukum Qadzaf Dalam Islam dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. As-Sakinah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.51729/sakinah11129
Agustiari, A., & Fauzi, M. (2021). Pendistribusian Zakat Bentuk Pinjaman Dalam Mengatasi Pedagang Usaha Mikro Dari Pinjaman Ribawi Di BAZNAS Kabupaten Kerinci. Jurnal Iqtisaduna, 7(2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v7i2.25402
Amiruddin, H. (2003). Investasi Harta Anak Yatim Untuk Modal Usaha Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. (Sarjana Thesis, Uin Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta).
Arnita, D. (2021). Kepengelolaan Harta Donasi Anak Yatim (Study Living Qur’an Qs. An-Nisa Ayat 2 Di Panti Asuhan Mahabbatul Ummi Palembang). (Sarjana Thesis, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang).
Azhari, F. (2015). Qawaid fiqhiyyah muamalah. Lembaga Pemberdayaan Kualitas Ummat Banjarmasin
Az-Zahabi, Imam Al Hafidz Abi Abdillah Muhammad Bin Ahmad Bin Usman. (n,d). Alkabair Watabyinil Maharim. Madinah: Maktabah Darutturos
Bakti, I. S., Alwi, A., & Saifullah, S. (2018). Eksistensi Dukun di Tanah Gayo. Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi), 12(2), 111-127.
Bolla, A. S., Patel, A. R., & Priefer, R. (2020). The silent development of counterfeit medications in developing countries–A systematic review of detection technologies. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 587, 119702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119702
Bowles, P. (2023). Capitalism. Routledge
Betsch, T., Jäckel, P., Hammes, M., & Brinkmann, B. J. (2021). On the adaptive value of paranormal beliefs-a qualitative study. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55(2), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09594-5
Chapra, M. U. (2008). The nature of riba in Islam. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies. 1-16. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Millah/article/view/431
Chen, M., Hu, M., & Wang, J. (2022). Food delivery service and restaurant: Friend or foe?. Management Science, 68(9), 6539-6551. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4245
Costa, H. (2021). Sexual Harassment in the workplace. In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 7382-7384). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3785
Dabarako, F., & Salama, M. (2025). Understanding contemporary miracles: A study on tauhīd and magical practices in Nigerian society. Ulum Islamiyyah, 37(01), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol37no01.584
Dean, A. K. (2018). The supernatural salesman: unpacking shaman ‘witch doctor’identity work. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(17-18), 1608-1631. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1549091
Esimbekova, E. N., Asanova, A. A., & Kratasyuk, V. A. (2023). Alternative enzyme inhibition assay for safety evaluation of food preservatives. Life, 13(6), 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061243
Fauzi, M., & Kurniawan, M. (2023). Muslim Prosperous Family (MPF) Consumption in Koto Tuo Ujung Pasir Village: Is It Consistent with Islamic Consumption Behaviour?. RISALAH IQTISADIYAH: Journal of Sharia Economics, 2(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.59107/ri.v2i1.29
Gilman, N., Goldhammer, J., & Weber, S. (Eds.). (2011). Deviant globalization: Black market economy in the 21st century. A&C Black.
Haikal, D., & Hasibuan, S. (2025). Meaning And Implications Of Shirk In Life Everyday: A Study Of The Interpretation Of Fi Zhilalil Qurʾān In The Social Context Of Binjai City Community. Journal Analytica Islamica, 14(2), 1542-1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jai.v14i2.26931
Hamim, K., & Supriadi, L. (2020). The Contextualization of Ḥifẓ Al-'Irḍ on Hoax News (A Study on Imam Tājuddīn al-Subkī’s Maqāṣīd al-sharī’a). Ulumuna, 24(2), 348-336. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v24i2.405
Haryanto, B. S. D. (2021). Sinful Income?: Being Muslims and Magic Agents in Madura Island-Indonesia. Humaniora, 12(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.6894
Hasan, A. F. (2018). Fiqh Muammalah Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer (Teori dan Praktek). Malang: UIN-Maliki Malang Press
Heath, T., & Heath, M. (2016). Once upon a time there was a consumer…: stories of magic and the magic of stories. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9-10), 811-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1189450
Hermanto, A. (2021). Al-Qawa’id Al-Fiqhiyyah Dalil Dan Metode Penyelesaian Masalah-Masalah Kekinian. Malang: Cv. Literasi Nusantara Abadi
Hoyle, C., & Harry, L. (2025). Diversion or death? The moral framework shaping bifurcated punishments for drug offences in Indonesia. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 32(4), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2024.2402262
Hudaefi, F. A., Çelik, Y., Hassan, M. K., Athief, F. H. N., Apriantoro, M. S., El Ashfahany, A., & Laallam, A. (2026). Shari’ah analytics of Riba. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2025-0244
Humaeni, A. (2014). Kepercayaan Kepada Kekuatan Gaib dalam Mantra Masyarakat Muslim Banten. El Harakah: Jurnal Budaya Islam, 16(1), 51-80. https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v16i1.2769
Hutomo, I. R., Warsito, L., Farida, A., Sejati, H., Susilowati, T., Lamijan, L., ... & Umami, A. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Perempuan Terhadap Kekerasan Seksual Di PT. Semarang Garment Kabupaten Semarang. JPeHI (Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia), 6(01), 135-147.. https://doi.org/10.61689/jpehi.v6i01.765
Indodax. (2024). Exit scam crypto: Kenali bahaya & lindungi investasi kamu. Accessed 22-04-2026, from: https://indodax.com/academy/exit-scam-crypto/
Ishak, M. S. I., & Asni, F. (2020). The role of maqasid al-Shariʿah in applying fiqh muamalat into modern Islamic banking in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(10), 2137-2154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2019-0224
Jeeva, C. (2016). Impact of Misleading Advertisements: Issues and Remedies. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 6(4), 155-157. https://doi.org/10.9756/BIJIEMS.7616
Kahf, M. (2022). Ayat dan Hadits Tentang Ekonomi. Jakarta: KNEKS. Translated by Unang Fauzi, and Muhammad Isa
Kanai, A. (2009). “Karoshi (work to death)” in Japan. Journal of business ethics, 84(Suppl 2), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9701-8
Kara, S. (2017). Modern slavery: A global perspective. Columbia University Press
Khairuddin, K., & Safrida, R. (2019). Pemeliharaan Harta Anak Yatim oleh Wali (Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Tangan-Tangan Kabupaten Abdya). Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 21(2), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v21i2.6494
Kobylewski, S., & Jacobson, M. F. (2012). Toxicology of food dyes. International journal of occupational and environmental health, 18(3), 220-246. https://doi.org/10.1179/1077352512Z.00000000034
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Lehmann, P., von Ruette, J., & Or, D. (2019). Deforestation effects on rainfall‐induced shallow landslides: Remote sensing and physically‐based modelling. Water Resources Research, 55(11), 9962-9976. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025233
Lu, H., Sun, M., & Zeng, Y. (2021). Will the food delivery industry be monopolized?. In 2021 International Conference on Financial Management and Economic Transition (FMET 2021) (pp. 95-100). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210917.016
Ma'nunah, N. S. (2017). Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 3(2), 403-425. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2017.3.2.403-425
Mackenzie, S. (2020). Transnational criminology: trafficking and global criminal markets. Policy Press.
Madinah, E. (2016). Tukar menukar uang pecahan baru ditinjau dari Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 14 Tahun 2012 dan pendapat Imam Wahbah Az-Zuhaili. (Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang).
Malbrough, R. T. (1986). Charms, Spells, and Formulas: For the Making and Use of Gris Gris Bags, Herb Candles, Doll Magic, Incenses, Oils, and Powders. Llewellyn Worldwide.
Moeran, B. (2014). Business, anthropology, and magical systems: The case of advertising. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, pp. 119-132). https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.01016
Mursal, M., Hulwati, H., Rozalinda, R., Fauzi, M., & Nenengsih, N. (2025). Reconstructing Homo Islamicus through Hifz al-Bi’ah: An ecological paradigm for contemporary Islamic economics. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1807-1832. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art21
Mustafa, D. A., Abdulsalam, H. A., & Yusuf, J. B. (2016). Islamic economics and the relevance of al-qawā ‘id al-fiqhiyyah. Sage Open, 6(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671374
NU Online (2023). Larangan Memakan Harta Anak Yatim Perspektif Al-Qur’an dan Hadits. Accessed 30-03-2026, from: https://islam.nu.or.id/syariah/larangan-memakan-harta-anak-yatim-perspektif-al-qur-an-dan-hadits-hYhEQ
NU Online. (2025). Hati Hati Menuduh Orang Lain Berzina, Ini Hukumannya Dalam Islam. Accessed 05-04-2026, from: https://islam.nu.or.id/syariah/hati-hati-menuduh-orang-lain-berzina-ini-hukumannya-dalam-islam-zjg99
Nur, I., & Puspitasari, R. (2023). Postgender Fiqh: The Views of MUI’s and KUPI’s Ulema on Postgenderism from Maqāṣid Sharī’ah Perspective. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 18(1), 152-176. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v18i1.7313
Oplatowska-Stachowiak, M., & Elliott, C. T. (2017). Food colors: Existing and emerging food safety concerns. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 57(3), 524-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.889652
Qadri, H. M.-D. (2019). Business Ethics in Islam. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326189
Romberg, R. (2003). Witchcraft and welfare: Spiritual capital and the business of magic in modern Puerto Rico. University of Texas Press.
Rudi Margono, S. H. (2026). Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Teknis Penanganan Kartel dan Monopoli.
Sani, A. (2014). Pasugihan Orang Banjar: Studi Identifikasi Prilaku dan Amaliah Pasugihan Orang Banjar di Kalsel. Jurnal Studia Insania, 2(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.18592/jsi.v2i2.1094
Sahal, U. (2023). Apakah hukum pertukaran uang mencakup riba? Berikut penjelasan dari dosen UM Surabaya. Accessed 17-02-2026, from: https://www.um-surabaya.ac.id/en/news/hukum-penukaran-uang-apakah-termasuk-riba-berikut-penjelasan-dosen-um-surabaya
Saleh, M. M. (2017). Tindak Pidana Sihir Menurut Perpspektif Hukum Islam. Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 9(1), 131-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/af.v9i1.3825
Setiawan, N., Sabaruddin, L. O., & Soewarno, N. (2025). The moderating role of Islamic business ethics on Ponzi schemes in the Umrah industry: a fraud triangle theory perspective. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2025-0256
Squires, P. (2021). Illegal firearms, illicit markets and weapon trafficking. In Firearms (pp. 51-71). Routledge.
Sternberg, H. O. R. (1987). Aggravation of floods in the Amazon River as a consequence of deforestation?. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 69(1), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.1987.11880208
Strzalkowski, P. (2019). Statistical analysis of workplace accidents in Polish mining industry. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science (Vol. 362, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/362/1/012033
Sudarti, S., & Najib, A. (2021). Punishment of Criminal Act of Accusing Adultery (Qadzaf) in Indonesian Positive Law: Perspective of Maqasid al-Sharia. Justicia Islamica, 18(2), 261-280. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v18i2.2711
Sukardi, B., Fachrurazi, F., & Supriyanto, S. (2019). Sharia Maqashid’s Inclusive Performance and Contribution to The Sharia Non-Bank Financial Industry in Indonesia. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 10(2), 283-310. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2019.10.2.432
Tazkia. (n.d). Tukar uang THR jelang Lebaran: Halalkah atau ternyata riba?. Accessed 17-02-2026, from: https://tazkia.ac.id/berita/populer/1294-tukar-uang-thr-jelang-lebaran-halalkah-atau-ternyata-riba.
Ţical, G. M., & Cojocaru, R. (2025). Fraudulent bankruptcy: Causes and Solutions to Overcome This Situation. Legea şi Viaţa, 381(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15525805
Thuật, V. H. (2008). Amulets and the Marketplace. Asian Ethnology, 67(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221080
Wahyudi, N. A., Risky, M. J., Reza, M. F., Yamin, S., Syaifuddin, M., & Prayogi, A. (2025). Sejarah Perlindungan Hak Waris Anak Yatim: Analisis Hukum Dalam Al-Qurʾān Surah An-Nisa'Ayat 6. Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 14(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.30651/mqsd.v14i3.28864
Yanto, F. (2018). Gunung Kawi: Menengok Wisata Religi Dan Ritual Pesugihan. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosiologi Agama (JISA), 1(2), 20-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/jisa.v1i2.5105
Zalsabila, P. A., & Haddade, A. W. (2023). Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Tinjauan Mazhab Fikih. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 42-58. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.vi.30062
Zuhdi, H. M. (2016). Qawa'id fiqhiyyah. Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Mataram
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Fauzi, Al Mahdi, Arzam Arzam, Mursal Mursal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with RELIGIA agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
RELIGIA use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License
http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.






