MANHAJ KRITIK MATAN ‘Ā’ISYAH RA

Authors

  • Niki Alma Febriana Fauzi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v5i1.9960

Abstract

This paper discussed the methods used by ‘Ā’isyah as benchmark in criticizing matan hadith. The accusation against Islam about the lack of methodology in the study of hadith criticism, especially matan criticism, has forced contemporary Islamic scholars to create a method that can be used to criticize the substance of hadith. Indeed, the principles in criticized matan hadith have been made and used by ‘Ā’isyah. The ‘Ā’isyah manhaj of matan criticism has been tested the reliability. The writer concluded that the methodology of ‘Ā’isyah manhaj of matan criticism was proven reliable for tested the authenticity of hadith by used the correspondence of truth and coherence theories in philosophical
epistemology as the method of analysis.

Keywords:

Correspondence theory, Coherence theory, the Matan critic

References

al-Muṭallib, ‘Abd dan Jīhān Rif‘at Fauzī, 2001, As-Sayyidah ‘Ā’isyah wa Tauṡīquhā li as-Sunnah, Kairo : Maktabah al-Khānjī,

‘Audah, Jāser, 2013, Al-Maqāṣid Bagi Pemula, Diterjemahkan oleh ‘Ali Abdelmon‘im, Yogyakarta : SUKA-Press,

Abbas, Hasjim, 2004, Kritik Matan Hadis: Versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha,Yogyakarta : Teras

Adlabī, Ṣalāḥuddīn al-, 1983, Manhaj Naqd al-Matn ‘inda ‘Ulamā’ al- Ḥadīṡ an-Nabawī, Beirut : Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīdah,

Aḥmad, 1995, Musnad Aḥmad, edisi Syu‘aib al-Arna’ūṭ dan ‘ĀdilMursyid, , Beirut : Mu’assasah ar-Risālah

Anwar, Syamsul, 2002, “Paradigma Pemikiran Hadis Modern”, dalam Fazlur Rahman dkk, Wacana Studi

Hadis Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana

________, 2011, Interkoneksi Studi Hadis dan Astronomi, Suara Muhammadiyah, Yogyakarta.

Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn ismā‘īl, 2002, Al-, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Edisi Muḥammad Zuhair ibn Nāṣir al-

Nāṣir, Beirut : Dār Ṭauq an-Najāh

Dakhīlī, Sa‘īd Fayīz ad-, 1989, Mausū‘ah Fiqh as-Sayyidah ‘Ā’isyah; Ḥayātuhā wa Fiqhuhā, Beirut : Dār

an-Nafā’is.

Dārimī, Abū Muḥammad ‘Abdillāh ibn ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān ibn al-Faḍl ibn Bahrām ad-, 2000, Sunan ad-

Dārimī, edisi Ḥusain Salīm Asad, Riyadh : Dār al-Mugnī li al-Nasyr wa at-Tauzī‘

Dumainī, Musfir ‘Azmullāh Ad-, t.t., Maqāyīs Naqd Mutūn as-Sunnah, Universitas Islam Imam Muhammad Ibnu Su’ud, Riyadh.

Fauzi, Nicky Alma Febriana, 2012,“Aisyah: Kritikus Hadis yang Romantis (1) (Sebuah Review atas Buku al-Ijabah li Iradi ma Istadrakathu ‘Aisyah ‘ala al-Shahabah karya Badrudin al-Zarkasyi),” dalam majalah Suara Muhammadiyah, edisi 14 tahun, h.20-1.

Ḥifnī, ‘Abd al-Mun‘im al-, 2003, Mausū‘ah Ummu al-Mu’minīn ‘Ā’isyah binti Abī Bakr, Kairo: Maktabah Madbūl.

Hospers, John, 1997, An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis, London: Routledge Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, Abū ‘Umar Yūsuf ibn ‘Abdillāh ibn Muḥammad, 2002, Al-Istī‘āb fī Ma‘rifah al-Aṣḥāb, edisi ‘Ādil Mursyid, Dār al-A’lām.

Ibn al-Aṡir, ‘Izzuddīn Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Alī ibn Muḥammad, t.t., Usdu al-Gābah fī Ma’rifah aṣ-Ṣaḥabah, edisi ‘Alī Muḥammad Mu‘awwid dan ‘Ādil Aḥmad ‘Abd al-Maujūd, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah

Ibn aṣ-Ṣalāh, Taqiyyuddīn ‘Uṡmān ibn ‘Abd ar-Raḥmān, 1986, ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadiṡ, Beirut : Dār al-Fikr,

Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī, t.t., Al-Iṣābah fī Tamyīz aṣ-Ṣaḥābah.

Ismail, Syuhudi, 2005, Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis; Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah, Jakarta : Bulan BintangJabali, Fu’ad, Sahabat Nabi; Siapa, ke Mana, dan Bagaimana?, Jakarta: Mizan Publika, 2010.

Jawābī, Muḥammad Ṭāhir al-, t.t., Juhūd al-Muḥaddiṡīn fī Naqd Matn al- Ḥadīṡ an-Nabawī asy-Syarīf,

Muassasāt al-Karīm ibn ‘Abdillāh. Kadarusman, 2005, Agama, Relasi Gender & Feminisme, Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana

Mukri, Barmawi, 2004, “Critical Study on The Concept of al-Ṣaḥāba Kulluhum ‘Udulun in ‘Ilm al-Ḥadīth,” Jurnal Al-Jāmi‘ah, vol. 42, no.2: Yogyakarta : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Mullākhāṭir, Khalīl Ibrāhīm, 1405 H, Zawāj as-Sayyidah ‘Ā’isyah wa Masyrū‘iyyah az-Zawāj al- Mubakkir wa ar-Radd ‘alā Munkirī Żālik, Madinah.

Munawwir, Ahmad Warson, 1997, Al-Munawwir; Kamus Arab-Indonesia, Surabaya : Pustaka Progresif

Nasution, Harun, 2002, Teologi Islam; Aliran-Aliran, Sejarah Analisa dan Perbandingan, Jakarta : UI-Press,

Nawawī, Muḥyiddīn ibn Syaraf an-, 1985, At-Taqrīb wa at-Taisīr li Ma‘rifah Sunan al-Basyar wa an-Nażīr, edisi Muḥammad ‘Uṡmān al-Khasyat, Beirut : Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī

Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf al-, 2002, Kaifa Nata‘āmal ma’a as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah, Kairo : Dār asy-Syurūq

Qāsimī, Muḥammad jamāluddīn al-, 2004, Qawā‘id at-Taḥdīṡ min Funūn Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīṡ, Edisi Muṣṭafā Syaikh Muṣṭafā, Beirut: Mu’assasah ar-Risālah

Siddiqi, Muhammad Zubayr, 2002, “Ulūm al-Hadīts dan Kritik Hadis”, dalam Fazlur Rahman dkk, Wacana Studi Hadis Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana

Solomon, Robert C., 1992, Introducing Philoshopy; A Text with Integrated Readings, Florida : Harcourt Brace College.

Tirmiżī, Abū ‘Īsā Muḥammad ibn ‘Īsā ibn Saurah at-, t.t., Sunan At-Tirmiżī, Edisi Aḥmad Muḥammad Syākir, Beirut : Dār Iḥyā’ at-Turāṡ al-

‘Arabī Titus, dkk., 1984, Persoalan-Persoalan Filsafat, Diterjemahkan oleh M. Rasjidi, Jakarta : Bulan Bintang,

White, Alan R., 1970, Truth, New York:Anchor Books

Żahabī, Syamsuddīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad aż-, 1955, Tażkirah al-Ḥuffaẓ, New Delhi : Dā’irah al-Ma‘ārif al-‘Usmānī,Zarkasyī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Abdillāh ibn Bahādur Abū ‘Abdillāh Badruddīn az-, 2001, Al-Ijābah li Īrādi mā Istadrakathu ‘Ā’isyah ‘alā al-Shaḥābah, edisi Jīhān Rif‘at Fauzī ‘Abd al-Muṭallib, Kairo : Maktabah al-Khānjī,

Zuḥailī, Wahbah az-, 2009, At-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-‘Aqīdah wa asy-Syarī‘ah wa al-Manhaj, Damaskus : Dār al-Fikr

Downloads

Published

2013-06-30

Article Statistics

166 Views
74 Downloads

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite